GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Bigger, Stronger, Faster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #81  
BlackonBlack's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 16, 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nonsensez9 @ February 26, 2006, 4:39 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
The 5.4 has the same bore as a 4.6, only longer stroke with no apparent difficulties. then again it has longer cylinders, too. Anyways, they both can use the same heads, intake, etc, I'd think the KB could bolt right on, no?
might need to borrow a tall hood from a new cobra [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

How can the 4.6 manifold fit on a 5.4? The deck height is taller on the 5.4 due to the longer cylinders. This would make the block wider given the same 90 degree angle of the V. Have you actually put a 4.6 manifold on a 5.4 block? The geometry doesn't add up. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img] 2 reputable engine builders have told me this isn't possible. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img]

Don, Excellent pictures and diagnosis. I have never heard of this happening. I wonder if Dynatech will step up and do the right thing here....Makes a good case for going catless if going F.I. although I ran my blown 88 for 7 years with Bassani high flow cats. Weird.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #82  
lawman's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Don, as a lawyer, let me compliment you on the way you documented the cause of your blown engine. Causation is clear. The question now is: Is Dynatech responsible to reimburse you for your blown engine because their defective part caused it. In law, this is known as consequential damages. Give me a few days and let me do some research on this issue and I'll see if you have a case. I normally practice criminal law but I have enough research skill to hopefully give you a definitive answer. Don't count on Dynatech's warranty covering it and it may in fact specifically exclude it. That's just an educated guess though. If I were them, I'd make you happy just to prevent the mountain of bad publicity they're getting on this forum. I'll be posting soon. I may be able to recommend counsel in your area. If not, I'll try to help you in any way I can.

Sincerely, A Brother Mustang Owner.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #83  
nonsensez9's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 8, 2005
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Northern BC, Canada
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(BlackonBlack @ February 26, 2006, 5:31 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
How can the 4.6 manifold fit on a 5.4? The deck height is taller on the 5.4 due to the longer cylinders. This would make the block wider given the same 90 degree angle of the V.
[/b][/quote]
good point
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #84  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lawman @ February 27, 2006, 10:28 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Don, as a lawyer, let me compliment you on the way you documented the cause of your blown engine. Causation is clear. The question now is: Is Dynatech responsible to reimburse you for your blown engine because their defective part caused it. In law, this is known as consequential damages. Give me a few days and let me do some research on this issue and I'll see if you have a case. I normally practice criminal law but I have enough research skill to hopefully give you a definitive answer. Don't count on Dynatech's warranty covering it and it may in fact specifically exclude it. That's just an educated guess though. If I were them, I'd make you happy just to prevent the mountain of bad publicity they're getting on this forum. I'll be posting soon. I may be able to recommend counsel in your area. If not, I'll try to help you in any way I can.

Sincerely, A Brother Mustang Owner.
[/b][/quote]
Thanks! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #85  
atomic_il's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 31, 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Don... imagine if the cat internals DID make it through the exhaust! I would hate to be standing behind it when that would have happened!

I wonder if this has happened before... EVER. It probably has, but i don't know.

Anyways, good luck dealing with dynatech.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #86  
redbullet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2006
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(BlackonBlack @ February 26, 2006, 8:31 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
How can the 4.6 manifold fit on a 5.4? The deck height is taller on the 5.4 due to the longer cylinders. This would make the block wider given the same 90 degree angle of the V. Have you actually put a 4.6 manifold on a 5.4 block? The geometry doesn't add up. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img] 2 reputable engine builders have told me this isn't possible. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img]

Don, Excellent pictures and diagnosis. I have never heard of this happening. I wonder if Dynatech will step up and do the right thing here....Makes a good case for going catless if going F.I. although I ran my blown 88 for 7 years with Bassani high flow cats. Weird.
[/b][/quote]


Adaptor plates can be fashioned and have been to compensate for the difference in the two's deck heights. They would look similar to the charge motion plates without the butterflies.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 02:29 PM
  #87  
nonsensez9's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 8, 2005
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Northern BC, Canada
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lawman @ February 27, 2006, 10:28 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Don, as a lawyer, let me compliment you on the way you documented the cause of your blown engine. Causation is clear.
[/b][/quote]

so long as they don't turn around and say the unexpected pressure of an engine cratering caused the cat to fail. If there are additional documented cat failures it will be simpler.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #88  
BlackonBlack's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 16, 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(redbullet @ February 27, 2006, 12:18 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Adaptor plates can be fashioned and have been to compensate for the difference in the two's deck heights. They would look similar to the charge motion plates without the butterflies.
[/b][/quote]

I'm sure that's possible, but my point was the 4.6 manifold is different and won't just bolt up.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #89  
redbullet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2006
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nonsensez9 @ February 27, 2006, 4:32 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
so long as they don't turn around and say the unexpected pressure of an engine cratering caused the cat to fail. If there are additional documented cat failures it will be simpler.
[/b][/quote]

First and foremost it's a racing part and before the legal eagles continue the first disclaimer is that these products are for racing purposes only and not legal for sale or use in CA or any state that has adapted CA emission standards. Second, federal penalty for tampering with federal emission equipment. Federal laws covering emission equipment states cats must be in the same location IE not moved as in this application.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #90  
mikem's Avatar
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Thats why I am building my Engine stronger and better before I push it further.YOU CANT RUN GOOD BOOST PRESSURE WITH POWDERED RODS PERIOD.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:02 PM
  #91  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Well, it looks like I have a Teksid block coming my way now. I found one earlier today for $400 shipped. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #92  
stang9325's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Congrats Don! Good luck with the build. Do you have a time frame for getting a finished product yet?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #93  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(stang9325 @ February 27, 2006, 4:23 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Congrats Don! Good luck with the build. Do you have a time frame for getting a finished product yet?
[/b][/quote]
I have a previously planned (and paid for) trip to Las Vegas for the NHRA event from April 6-9. My goal is to drive the Mustang there. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img] So I have about 5 weeks to "git er dun".
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 09:35 PM
  #94  
Vegasjay's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2004
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
I will look forward to seeing you and your Pony... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #95  
300HPGT's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ February 24, 2006, 11:40 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Absolutely a daily driver... 17,000+ miles in just under 10 months.
[/b][/quote]
I got you beat don. lol. 38,000 miles in 10 mo. now 46,000 miles in 13 mo.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #96  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(300HPGT @ February 27, 2006, 9:04 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I got you beat don. lol. 38,000 miles in 10 mo. now 46,000 miles in 13 mo.
[/b][/quote]
Yea, but I'll have two engines in 11 months too. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon24.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #97  
TehSLeeper's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 15, 2005
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(redbullet @ February 27, 2006, 2:50 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
First and foremost it's a racing part and before the legal eagles continue the first disclaimer is that these products are for racing purposes only and not legal for sale or use in CA or any state that has adapted CA emission standards. Second, federal penalty for tampering with federal emission equipment. Federal laws covering emission equipment states cats must be in the same location IE not moved as in this application.
[/b][/quote]
Regardless if the parts were illegal in CA or not they were faulty parts that caused his engine to blow. Unless dynatech can prove that Don somehow managed to tamper with the cat's to the point they were damaged enough to cause a problem they're not liable.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #98  
300HPGT's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
it does appear now that i have read the whole thread that the catalytic converter would be the cause of premature failure of your rods. That sucker was just about clogged. but hey 412hp w/ clogged cat is pretty darn good. lol. Its good that you can get a new block at a decient price. Did it do any damage to the crank??? or are you getting a complete stroker kit??? I might get new Rods and pistons before I supercharge if and when I get the money to. But I hope that you get it finished soon and so you can get to Vegas.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:51 PM
  #99  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
I'm planning on a Teksid alum block, with a cobra crank, forged rods and pistons. No stroker... staying at 4.6 [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2006 | 01:05 AM
  #100  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Would CHP or one of the other "name" engine builders be the way to go for a forced induction ready short block. Seems like it might be simpler and still result in more hp than is reasonable.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.