ARH LT's or JBA LT's?
#1
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ARH LT's or JBA LT's?
I am really wanting to get some longtube headers, but I am debating between ARH and JBA's. Anyone with experience with these? Has anyone tried them both? How do they compare? And for the JBA's, what is the difference between ceramic coating and a 409 SS Finish?
#2
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw the ARH at Carlisle this weekend and they are nice. I also checked out them installed on two stangs and was very impressed. I 've never seen the JBA but the online opinions I've seen say ARH are better overall.
#3
I've got JBA's on mine and I'm very happy with them. A plain SS finish is just an uncoated header. It will change colors and won't have the insulative properties of a ceramic coated header. The ceramic coating dissapates heat quickly and keeps underhood temps down some. They'll also remain a consistent color.
I got mine used from the PowerHouse 411 project car. They were just the uncoated SS headers, so I went and had them coated inside and out for $200.
I got mine used from the PowerHouse 411 project car. They were just the uncoated SS headers, so I went and had them coated inside and out for $200.
#4
If you're looking for the highest quality, stick with T-304 stainless. Uncoated, it will turn brown, but is unlikely to rust. It's the most corrosion resistant material for headers. T-409 stainless is the next step down. It also resists corrosion, but a light surface rust will form if uncoated. But it's also cheaper.
These pics show the color variations. My headers are T-304, and I had them Jet-Hot coated, and they are still a nice silver color. The X-pipe is also T-304 SS, but was not coated.
These pics show the color variations. My headers are T-304, and I had them Jet-Hot coated, and they are still a nice silver color. The X-pipe is also T-304 SS, but was not coated.
#6
#7
GT Member
I have been looking into this for a while and I am not real happy with the little hp gains lt headers actually give you. 12 hp max thats on a good day, wow and 10 more with a mid pipe. sorry not worth the 1200 -1400 bucks,
WTF why do these motors suck at making power on mods and the LS engines fart hp, it sucks. even a good set of cams do not produce enough HP vs the overall price tag.
#8
1
12hp? I think you're missing about 10hp.
The reason they ain't powerful? Small displacement and low compression is a big factor.
I am looking at this setup because it's under 1000 bucks and they look nice, but thats all you get with them..
I have been looking into this for a while and I am not real happy with the little hp gains lt headers actually give you. 12 hp max thats on a good day, wow and 10 more with a mid pipe. sorry not worth the 1200 -1400 bucks,
WTF why do these motors suck at making power on mods and the LS engines fart hp, it sucks. even a good set of cams do not produce enough HP vs the overall price tag.
I have been looking into this for a while and I am not real happy with the little hp gains lt headers actually give you. 12 hp max thats on a good day, wow and 10 more with a mid pipe. sorry not worth the 1200 -1400 bucks,
WTF why do these motors suck at making power on mods and the LS engines fart hp, it sucks. even a good set of cams do not produce enough HP vs the overall price tag.
The reason they ain't powerful? Small displacement and low compression is a big factor.
#9
John
#10
GT Member
I am not missing 10, the most I have seen sofar on other forums, with a full exhaust was 20 hp on the 281 3v. Supercharged cars respond better to headers that N/A.. on average I have seen 10-15 hp with headers and catted x
Yea it's floating around here hehehe, I have been doing my research for a few weeks now and the results are not good
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=67779
#11
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 26, 2006
Location: East Moline, IL
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Small Displacment?? Chevy's 302 (1967-69 Z-28) responded to over 30 hp with headers and camed, it's a dam monter.
I am not missing 10, the most I have seen sofar on other forums, with a full exhaust was 20 hp on the 281 3v. Supercharged cars respond better to headers that N/A.. on average I have seen 10-15 hp with headers and catted x
Yea it's floating around here hehehe, I have been doing my research for a few weeks now and the results are not good
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=67779
I am not missing 10, the most I have seen sofar on other forums, with a full exhaust was 20 hp on the 281 3v. Supercharged cars respond better to headers that N/A.. on average I have seen 10-15 hp with headers and catted x
Yea it's floating around here hehehe, I have been doing my research for a few weeks now and the results are not good
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=67779
#12
From what I have been told shorty style headers are pointless on both engines. Aftercat exhaust on the S197 gains you what, somewhere between 0 and 10 hp while on an LS1 you can expect somewhere between 10 and 15. Longtubes would probably be one of the last mods I do on the Mustang after the blower, heads and cam, (same with my T/A although by the time I need a motor for that I'll probably slap an STS turbo on it and run the better flowing later exhaust manifolds).
#13
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, I am wondering about size, 1 3/4 or 1 5/8. I know it is recommended 1 5/8 for a naturally aspirated engine, but it is too hard to tell if i am going to get a blower in the future. BUT, I do know for sure that I would like to do cams, should I go with 1 3/4 for the cams? or stay with 1 5/8?
#14
If you are going w/ cams, and maybe FI down the road, then get the 1.75s. They are working fine on my n/a motor right now. I really didn't see any downside to the the larger primaries.
#16
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Mike saw my car and 94Tbird's car up at Carlisle. American Racing is THE BEST for long tube headers IMHO. Their quality is 2nd to none, and fit is perfect. Plus, the sound, OH MY!!!
#17
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw them and they look really nice and sound great! However, after talking to my tuner I'm not going with long tubes unless I get a super charger. When you price the system with install and tunning time your getting pretty close to the $1800.00+ range. I can't justify spending that much money for such a small gain. I'm not down with the torque loss either.
#18
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I saw them and they look really nice and sound great! However, after talking to my tuner I'm not going with long tubes unless I get a super charger. When you price the system with install and tunning time your getting pretty close to the $1800.00+ range. I can't justify spending that much money for such a small gain. I'm not down with the torque loss either.
#19
I saw them and they look really nice and sound great! However, after talking to my tuner I'm not going with long tubes unless I get a super charger. When you price the system with install and tunning time your getting pretty close to the $1800.00+ range. I can't justify spending that much money for such a small gain. I'm not down with the torque loss either.
#20
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steeda UDP as well plus the car has 35K miles on it so the engine is well broken it. Plus my tuner can work some magic on these things. I know my numbers are pretty on because a Roush with a Whipple was hitting the typical HP numbers that day.