Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics
View Poll Results: Would you trade your GT in for a Challenger if they came out today?
Yes - that ***** is bad
20
15.87%
I think its sweet but no way
65
51.59%
Not a chance in Hell
41
32.54%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll

Saw the Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #1  
WuTimeUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2005
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Saw the Challenger

I don't know if this is the right place so sorry mods but I couldn't wait anymore! I saw the new challenger for the first time in person and almost fell on my face. It really is a sweet lookin ride. I'm die hard mustang but would you guys trade your stang for this?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 11:18 PM
  #2  
Error404's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2005
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Culver City
I wouldn't trade in my mustang for it, but if the challenger were to have been available when I got my mustang, I would have surely been torn between them. Same for the Camaro. If there would have been a well priced 2 door muscle car from Ford, Chevy, and Dodge when I got my Mustang, it would have been a difficult decision! But now that I have made my decision, the decision stays unless someone wrecks my car.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
Sure this is the right place to post a poll about the Challenger. I mean, this totally falls under the "2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information" section.

Regardless, it's a pretty sweet ride and all...but it's no Mustang!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #4  
Arrow's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2007
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Anybody caught a proposed MSRP for those yet?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:02 AM
  #5  
DavidM's Avatar
 
Joined: October 13, 2006
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0


But Not a chance in Hell!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:15 AM
  #6  
nynvolt's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
If I could get it without extending my payments or increasing my monthly, I'd trade in for one. I LOVE the way it looks and should have at least 340+ hp. It will be heavy but man what a looker! I imagine it's going to be pretty pricey too, for the top model V8 your talking no less than 5k more than a fully loaded Mustang GT. And thats not considering a special edition RT or whatever Dodge calls their high performance models.

But its the real world, I wouldn't trade my car in and start new higher payments on one. But as said before if it came out at the same time as the new Mustang did, it would have been a hard decision, that most probably would have been decided by bottom line...the price.

Don't get me wrong I LOVE my Mustang GT, the looks and price are what got to me more than the hp/tq numbers. I have no regrets and look forward to seeing them on the streets.

I voted no way.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #7  
HOSS429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 175
From: alerbamer
i dont see the challenger selling anywhere near what the mustang has and see the camaro selling even less .. i like the challenger but dont care for the front end look of the camaro .. looks to much like a " cartoon car "
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #8  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
I like the challenger and all but i will not buy it over the stang. I ahve always liked the bang for the buck of the stang and can always mod the engine to match the challengers hp. But it would be impossible to mod the challengers weight to match the mustang GT.



Originally Posted by HOSS429
i dont see the challenger selling anywhere near what the mustang has and see the camaro selling even less .. i like the challenger but dont care for the front end look of the camaro .. looks to much like a " cartoon car "
I honestly think that the production camaros front end will be better in teh production car.

From all the feedback people have given the last 2 years is that the grill is fugly.

It really would be stupid if GM let it be when that is the most srutenized part of the car.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #9  
TheRealOne's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
It is a very very sweet ride but I think it will be to pricey if it looks like the concept or they will hit the price point but the car will not look no where near as good. That goes double for the Camaro as the General has a history of blowing it when it coes to that sort of thing. Anyone remember the GTO?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #10  
x21's Avatar
x21
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2007
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Florida again!
I think what it would need would be a successful 'low end' market. What I mean is that it will need a lower priced V-6 model. How do you think the Mustang is so successful? It has been the 6 and 4 banger models that have carried the line for 40 yrs. GTOs? no lower priced (V6 models) = small market. As long as they have affordable, small motor, lower priced models, I think they will definitely have a seller. A good example are their 300 and Charger models- mostly V6 models are on the road right now.
Since I've never bought/owned a new car, and the only GT I own is a 69, I think i'll just be hanging on to my ponies
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
The GTO died because it looked like a big cavalier, not because there wasn't a market for it.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #12  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
well the GTO was also too expensive and extremely unpractical.

The trunk is half the size of the stangs and you can't put the rear seat down either. All because it was never designed to pass U.S. standards.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #13  
subzero05's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Won't trade the car in for it, but I will buy one in 2009 when the 6 speed comes out. There will be NO sticks for the 2008 model year.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #14  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I think Challenger is a great looking car, but after disaster called "Dodge Intrepid" I don't wanna anything from Chrysler anytime soon.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #15  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
The Dodge Challenger and new Camaro are a dollar short and a day late, or rather 5 years too late and several thousand dollars more expensive. Had they debuted simultaneously with the S197, they probably would have pulled a lot of sales from the Mustangs.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 03:30 PM
  #16  
WuTimeUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2005
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
ya I know the section is wrong but I figured it get the most looks in here... I'll post those pics up soon. So there wont be a stick at all til 09? Why the hell would they do that? Any figures for the SRT 8 model yet?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #17  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
Originally Posted by WuTimeUT
ya I know the section is wrong but I figured it get the most looks in here... I'll post those pics up soon. So there wont be a stick at all til 09? Why the hell would they do that? Any figures for the SRT 8 model yet?
Knowing Chrysler, it will probably have a 5 speed automatic and it will probably weigh in excess of 4000 lb.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #18  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Just like Shelby GT500 (for weight part).
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #19  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
Yep. The Challenger is supposed to be based on the LX platform, which isn't lightweight at all (Charger/300/Magnum). Coupled with the fact the high end Charger is supposed to have gobs of torque, it'll probably be on-par with the Ford Crown Victoria in weight (4100-4300 lb).
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #20  
crucut's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Never
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 AM.