General Mustang Chat Not Model Year Specific

Curb Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/10/05, 08:55 PM
  #1  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the curb weights for the 87-93 and the 94-95? I checked the timeline, and couldn't find it.

Thanks.
Old 7/11/05, 04:07 PM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
63galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 86 mustang weighs arund 3080...i tihnk 87-93's were just a little heavier. 94-95's weighed around 3300-3400
Old 7/11/05, 04:17 PM
  #3  
Team Mustang Source
 
bigred0383's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87-93=2,725-3,350 depending on body style and engines. (notchback, hatchback, convertible, 4 cylinder, V8)
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)

If you have something specific in mind, let me know.

These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
Old 7/12/05, 01:58 AM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 11, 2005, 4:20 PM
87-93=2,725-3,350 depending on body style and engines. (notchback, hatchback, convertible, 4 cylinder, V8)
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)

If you have something specific in mind, let me know.

These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
The verts should weigh the most, but I'm looking at hardtop V8s. I should have been more specific.

So:
87-93 V8 Hatchback
94-95 V8 Coupe


Thanks!
Old 7/12/05, 01:03 PM
  #5  
Team Mustang Source
 
bigred0383's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035

94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354

Probably way more than you wanted to know.
Old 7/13/05, 02:02 AM
  #6  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 12, 2005, 1:06 PM
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035

94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354

Probably way more than you wanted to know.
Yup!

Nah, it really helps out because I always hear how light the foxes are, but needed some numbers. Currently I'm in the market for a 94-95 Stang.
Old 7/13/05, 08:12 PM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
 
428CJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 10, 2004
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 12, 2005, 2:06 PM
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035

94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354

Probably way more than you wanted to know.
Do you know whly the 90 V8 weighed 400lbs lighter? That is really strange. And who would, (back when those cars were brand new) buy a 91 when it was obviously a lot slower than the 90?
Old 7/13/05, 08:52 PM
  #8  
Team Mustang Source
 
bigred0383's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No idea. Those were just the figures they had.
Old 7/14/05, 06:32 AM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
 
428CJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 10, 2004
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 13, 2005, 9:55 PM
No idea. Those were just the figures they had.
Where did you get those numbers? I'm interested in what the older Fox's weighed....
Old 7/14/05, 12:49 PM
  #10  
Team Mustang Source
 
bigred0383's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got all the numbers from those nifty 1999 35th anniversary collector's cards, believe it or not. For each model year they engine choices with horsepower ratings; all bodystyle choices, what they weighed, and the cost of them when new; chassis info; and production totals.
Old 7/17/05, 11:09 PM
  #11  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally posted by 428CJ@July 13, 2005, 9:15 PM
Do you know whly the 90 V8 weighed 400lbs lighter? That is really strange. And who would, (back when those cars were brand new) buy a 91 when it was obviously a lot slower than the 90?
Uhhhh.....because somebody was in the market for a new one.

Anywhosit, something doesn't sit right? There shouldn't be a drastic weight difference for 1 model year considering that the cars were essentially unchanged in general configuration since 1987.

If that were the case the 1990 model year 5.0s would have been the fastest production cars for that generation. I dont remeber any articles detailing mid to low 13 second fox body cars?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cozyp828
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
12/13/17 05:53 PM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
Fred_Garvin
2010-2014 Mustang
4
9/17/15 04:10 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM
earl610
GT
1
9/6/15 05:48 PM



Quick Reply: Curb Weight



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 PM.