Off-Topic Chatter Non-Vehicle Related Chat

Return of the Cold War?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #41  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Red Star
Or maybe they just don't have oil that Iraq have.
There's a lot of truth to that. The repeal of Public Law 80 (which kicked U.S. companies out of Iraq’s oil fields) is being disassembled as we speak to clear the way for U.S. oil companies to extract Iraqi oil.

Gee, what a surprise.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #42  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by jsaylor
I am far more concerned with silly decisions made by our own goverment regarding our military hardware...like the ridiculous decisions to purchase the Super Hornet over a new varaint of the Tomcat and the ridiculously political effort to replace the M4 and M16 rifles.
I don't know, some of the newer concept small-arms weapons shown on futureweapons look friggin amazing. I think the Tomcat was too expensive and considering there is no real air force from another nation to fight why bother. It was simply a platform for the Pheonix weapon system. There is a lot of sentimental feelings for the Tomcat but it was really an ancient aircraft. The future of aerial warfare is stealth high performance aircraft like the JSF and f-22 and the inevitable shift to unmanned fighters. Mach 4+, stealth, 20G capable aircraft at a fraction of the cost anyone? In reality, Superhornets, Raptors and JSF's are pretty much all we need as offensive fighter aircraft. Hornets are the utility trucks and the JSF will be the rapier.

The 'wave of the future' is consolidation of technology, such as the Burke class surface ships, they can handle the tasks previously covered by 4 different classes of ships. The specialized tasks are becoming more of an issue for the weapons themselves. 2 or 3 strike aircraft types with dozens of specialized ordinance to choose from. We no longer need 5 different aircraft to carry 7 different types of weapons. What country has anything remotely capable of waging an attack on a US carrier group?

As for sinking carriers, we are the only nation that has practice doing this, over 30 have been destroyed under the SINKEX program. Russia has never sunk one, even in practice.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonathonK
Which is Better
3
Nov 17, 2017 12:02 PM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
Sep 30, 2015 07:02 PM
billy y
Introductions
0
Sep 24, 2015 11:48 AM
Omegaprime92
1994-2004 V-8
2
Sep 8, 2015 08:53 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.