Off-Topic Chatter Non-Vehicle Related Chat

I need a new TV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/6/10, 08:25 AM
  #1  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
WaltM's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I need a new TV

My TV took a poop. I'm looking at 42" flat screens. Do I want 3d? DLP?

Input is appreciated.
Old 5/6/10, 08:43 AM
  #2  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,583
Received 667 Likes on 541 Posts
This is, of course, my own opinion, and others might have a better or worse idea.

LED backlighting is the best. They're thinner, cooler, and as the whole thing about these screens (for the most part) is all about the backlight, having an LED instead of a flourescent tube or other less reliable lighting source makes a ton of sense. And did I mention it's thinner and cooler (and therefore less energy to run?)

The 3d thing is optional, and totally depending on whether you want it or not, and have all the other equipment, want to buy the brandnewest and taking chances, and like wearing at this time wired glasses that require something to be wired to. I'd skip it myself, until they come out with proper non-wired 3d.

After that... it's preference. You like Samsung, LG, Westinghouse, etc, ad nauseum... have fun.

You might want to go to Newegg.com, for example, because of the feedback the customers give. It can be very helpful in your decision making.
Old 5/6/10, 10:14 AM
  #3  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
WaltM's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks.

I'm leaning toward http://www.crutchfield.com/p_68942LD...ssi=0&tp=35975

Unless I decide to go Vizio. Then it's http://www.walmart.com/ip/Vizio-42-C...ReviewTitleBar

But I'm not happy about the refresh rate.
Old 5/6/10, 10:26 AM
  #4  
Founding MOTM
Committee Member
 
Antigini-GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2, 2007
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From what i've read 3D tv is crap. The good thing about 3D tv's is they brought down the prices of LED tv's! Or you could always take the money you would put toward a 46" LED and pick up a much bigger plasma. Personally i'd go for a Samsung LED, just because i'm a brand ***** like that.
Old 5/6/10, 10:42 AM
  #5  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
WaltM's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Antigini-GT/CS
From what i've read 3D tv is crap. The good thing about 3D tv's is they brought down the prices of LED tv's!
You have a point, besides I'm not an "early adopter". I need a high refresh rate and I'm also intrigued (sp) with the web access feature on the LG. The Vizio would just replace what I have.
Old 5/6/10, 11:59 AM
  #6  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 342 Likes on 215 Posts
I recently got a 47" Magnabox 1080P for $699 at Target less 10% for applying for their credit card. It is not 3D but the picture is as good as I've seen.
Old 5/6/10, 12:03 PM
  #7  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
WaltM's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
I recently got a 47" Magnabox 1080P for $699 at Target ....
Can't beat that. What model number?
Old 5/6/10, 12:04 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
MusicMan66's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We just got a new LCD TV last year. And I did pretty extensive research, and the three brands consistently reviewed the highest were (in no particular order): Sony, Samsung, and LG. Check those out.

I agree with the LED backlighting being the better choice, mainly because those bulbs will last considerably longer.

Don't even bother with the 3D TV. Not worth it, IMO.
Old 5/6/10, 12:19 PM
  #9  
 
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Trapped in Minnesota
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 0
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
3D is severely overrated and wouldnt be all that fun for normal tv watching. Go somewhere like crutchfield and read reviews. That usually helps a lot.
Old 5/6/10, 12:20 PM
  #10  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 342 Likes on 215 Posts
Originally Posted by WaltM
Can't beat that. What model number?
47MF439B (Full HD)

Correction: The price was $799 instead of $699. Sorry, I posted from memory.
Old 5/6/10, 06:46 PM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,583
Received 667 Likes on 541 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Notch
3D is severely overrated and wouldnt be all that fun for normal tv watching. Go somewhere like crutchfield and read reviews. That usually helps a lot.
There ya go. Great advice, I shoulda thought of them too.

--

I was just talking to a coworker who saw this TV at Best Buy: http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/t...ype=prd_detail

And was saying there were no glasses. No wires. Just watch, and it's 3d.

I was... rather impressed at that, to be honest, but I've not seen it myself, so I can't corroborate, and maybe his glasses he wears worked with the TV.




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 AM.