General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

You can't fix stupid in Camp Camaro...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/20/12, 12:49 PM
  #1  
GTR Member
Thread Starter
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You can't fix stupid in Camp Camaro...

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/20/c...-shelby-gt500/

Man, their chief engineer is a ballsy fellow.
Old 1/20/12, 01:07 PM
  #2  
Team Mustang Source
 
bpmurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fighting Words From ZL1 Chief Engineer!

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/20/c...-shelby-gt500/

"We've done simulations. We predict that the ZL1 will be quicker to 60 than the [2013] GT500.."

I play video games too Al!
Old 1/20/12, 01:13 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,042
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sorry, about 20 min late.
Old 1/20/12, 01:21 PM
  #4  
Team Mustang Source
 
bpmurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500
Sorry, about 20 min late.
Please point me to the thread in this section on the topic?
Old 1/20/12, 01:24 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
Pete07GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2011
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So what did they do, consult Miss Cleo and put into a mission statement? GM-zero to bankrupt at warp speed
Old 1/20/12, 01:29 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,042
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by bpmurr

Please point me to the thread in this section on the topic?
Steve (overboost) posted it in "general vehicle" under something like "can't fix stupid in the camaro camp"
Old 1/20/12, 01:32 PM
  #7  
GTR Member
Thread Starter
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks. I'll merge them.
Old 1/20/12, 01:37 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
Kinyodas's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: Slidell
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Overboost - love the avatar!

How far will the one-upmanship go until it ends - supersonic flying machines? These monsters are already shedding more juice than some locomotives.

I'm throwing the gauntlet here - first one to match those stats wins!
Old 1/20/12, 01:37 PM
  #9  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bahahahahhahahah!!!!!!

I love the "we've done simulations" line! Any engineer worth his weight will tell you the number one thing you never forget about simulations/models is that they CAN BE WRONG.

They are only approximations. And since I'm betting that their last model is based on the 2012 GT500, I'd guess that whatever they've modified in that model to 'simulate' a '13 GT500 is inaccurate. Nice try though
__________________
Old 1/20/12, 01:44 PM
  #10  
Team Mustang Source
 
bpmurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500
Steve (overboost) posted it in "general vehicle" under something like "can't fix stupid in the camaro camp"
I would have really liked it to be in the GT500 section but whatever...
Old 1/21/12, 10:34 AM
  #11  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I posted the below information in a different, ZL1-related thread, but I felt as though it was germane to this topic. In order for the 2012 Camaro ZL1 to be quicker in terms of acceleration, the 2013 GT500 would have to become slower than the outgoing 2011-12 GT500. Motor Trend has the ZL1 accelerating to 60 mph in 3.8 seconds, where the 550-horse GT500 hits that mark in 4.1 seconds. Car and Driver has identical times of 4.1 seconds for both cars; keep in mind, the ZL1 features a sophisticated launch control system and 305 rear tires whereas the 2007-12 GT500's are notoriously hard to launch. For 2013, the GT500 gains launch control among other electro-nannies that aid in performance. Compared to the Camaro ZL1, the 2013 GT500 is a couple hundred pounds lighter, features 70 additional horsepower and 44 lb-ft of extra torque in addition to several other launch- and performance-enhancing upgrades, and I just can't see Ford's upcoming super Mustang accelerating slower than the outgoing model.


Car and Driver

2011 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 PP coupe ---- 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

base price - $49,495 ----------------------------------- $56,295
price as tested - $55,330 ------------------------------ $56,795
curb weight - 3,751 lbs; 6.8 lb per hp ----------------- 4,120; 7.1
0-30 - 1.7 seconds -------------------------------------- 1.8
0-40 - 2.3 ------------------------------------------------ 2.4
0-50 - 3.2 ------------------------------------------------ 3.1
0-60 - 4.1 ------------------------------------------------ 4.1
0-70 - 5.1 ------------------------------------------------ 5.0
0-80 - 6.4 ------------------------------------------------ 6.2
0-90 - 7.7 ------------------------------------------------ 7.5
0-100 - 9.1 ----------------------------------------------- 8.9
0-110 - 11.0 --------------------------------------------- 10.7
0-120 - 12.9 --------------------------------------------- 12.6
0-130 - 15.1 --------------------------------------------- 14.7
0-140 - 18.9 --------------------------------------------- n/a
0-150 - 23.6 --------------------------------------------- n/a
street start, 5-60 - 4.5 --------------------------------- 4.6
top gear, 30-50 - 11.0 ---------------------------------- 7.8
top gear, 50-70 - 9.9 ----------------------------------- 6.7
1/4 mile - 12.7 @ 117 mph ---------------------------- 12.3 @ 119 mph
top speed - 155 mph ----------------------------------- 180 mph
70-0 braking - 151 feet -------------------------------- 165 feet
skidpad grip - 1.0 g ------------------------------------ 0.98 g
fuel economy - 15 city / 23 highway; 15 observed -- 14/16; 13

Motor Trend

2011 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 PP coupe ------ 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

base price - $49,495 ------------------------------------- $55,995
price as tested - $55,330 -------------------------------- $56,465
curb weight - 3,801 lbs; 6.91 lb per hp ----------------- 4,051; 7.0
0-30 - 1.6 seconds --------------------------------------- 1.6
0-40 - 2.3 ------------------------------------------------- 2.2
0-50 - 3.1 ------------------------------------------------- 2.9
0-60 - 4.1 ------------------------------------------------- 3.8
0-70 - 5.1 ------------------------------------------------- 4.8
0-80 - 6.3 ------------------------------------------------- 6.0
0-90 - 7.7 ------------------------------------------------- 7.3
0-100 - 9.2 ------------------------------------------------ 8.7
passing, 45-65 - 2.0 -------------------------------------- 1.7
1/4 mile - 12.4 @ 115.8 mph ---------------------------- 12.1 @ 117.4
60-0 braking - 104 feet ----------------------------------- 108
skidpad grip - 1.01 g -------------------------------------- 1.0 g
fuel economy - 15 city / 23 highway --------------------- 16 / 19
Old 1/21/12, 10:44 AM
  #12  
Mach 1 Member
 
askjeffro's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Its simple guys, they want to keep their fans happy. They will stoke the fire with comments like this so prospective buyers come through for them. If you are not loyal to one brand and were considering the ZL1, you now have pause with the GT500 coming. So, this type of comment is just marketing.
Old 1/21/12, 12:09 PM
  #13  
Mach 1 Member
 
mustangmaniak2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 17, 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fire is burning quite seriousty, but I still cant it through my head that taking the `12 SVTPP on a track day would void the warranty on the diff and transmision. That can`t be true. And i really hoped for some brake ducting the `13, i mean this is getting rediculous, a simple NACA duct would cost like what 20 bucks? Where else would people who bought a 650 horesepower car use it besides on a track? Team SVT would have to be miracle workers in order to make that rear axle work in the real world with that kind of power. Why cant they do the same thing they did to the Termi ten years ago. The car had 2 years of production left and they still gave it a kickass IRS setup without that big of a price change. For gods sake its a 55 000$ car, it deserves it!
Old 1/21/12, 01:22 PM
  #14  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Thomas S's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Wow Chevy is getting desperate! They know they will lose and now they are grasping for straws.
Old 1/21/12, 02:01 PM
  #15  
Axe
Member
 
Axe's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thomas S
Wow Chevy is getting desperate! They know they will lose and now they are grasping for straws.
Im sure winning the sales race month after month offers them some consolation.
Old 1/21/12, 02:01 PM
  #16  
GT Member
 
jskup1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 30, 2011
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No matter what Chevy puts under the hood, the car still looks like a lowered Humvee.
Old 1/21/12, 04:05 PM
  #17  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Axe
Im sure winning the sales race month after month offers them some consolation.
The non-stop crap talk and excuses from the Camaro contingent since Ford announced the specifications for the 2013 GT500 doesn't bother me because fanboys will be fanboys. We heard it all before when Ford announced the 2011 Mustang 5.0L; the head-to-head reviews and performance specifications paint a picture completely different from what the Chevy crowd would have had you believe initially, you know, with the Camaro featuring the bigger, more-powerful engine, "superior" IRS, blah blah. However, when the source of the rhetoric is a high-profile GM executive like Al Oppenheiser, it just sounds pathetic, in my opinion. If your car's really so great, Al, let its performance speak for itself ("simulations"? Really??) Maybe I missed it, but I don't remember any high-profile Ford executives or engineers trashing GM, even despite the myriad of bad news with GM in the subject line over the past couple years (the Camaro being dead from 2002-10; GM's bankruptcy -- maybe they should have run their "how to run a company and keep from going bankrupt" simulations; the huge flop that is the Volt -- take your pick). Ford Mustang fans should thank GM for making the Camaro? The Camaro wouldn't exist if not for the Mustang, both initially and in its new, two-ton modern iteration. And, congratulations to Chevy for outselling a Mustang that has looked pretty much the same since MY 2005. While not the sales obliteration I was expecting with an all-new car and eight years of pent-up demand, a win is a win. I have no doubt that Ford will pull out all the stops for MY 2015, and that's something we can all thank Chevy (and, to a lesser extent, Dodge) for.

Last edited by MARZ; 1/21/12 at 04:44 PM. Reason: Fixed the Camaro's resurrection year from 2010
Old 1/21/12, 04:39 PM
  #18  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MARZ
The non-stop crap talk and excuses from the Camaro contingent since Ford announced the specifications for the 2013 GT500 doesn't bother me because fanboys will be fanboys. We heard it all before when Ford announced the 2011 Mustang 5.0L; the head-to-head reviews and performance specifications paint a picture completely different from what the Chevy crowd would have had you believe initially, you know, with the Camaro featuring the bigger, more-powerful engine, "superior" IRS, blah blah. However, when the source of the rhetoric is a high-profile GM executive like Al Oppenheiser, it just sounds pathetic, in my opinion. If your car's really so great, Al, let its performance speak for itself ("simulations"? Really??) Maybe I missed it, but I don't remember any high-profile Ford executives or engineers trashing GM, even despite the myriad of bad news with GM in the subject line over the past couple years (the Camaro being dead from 2002-12; GM's bankruptcy -- maybe they should have run their "how to run a company and keep from going bankrupt" simulations; the huge flop that is the Volt -- take your pick). Ford Mustang fans should thank GM for making the Camaro? The Camaro wouldn't exist if not for the Mustang, both initially and in its new, two-ton modern iteration. And, congratulations to Chevy for outselling a Mustang that has looked pretty much the same since MY 2005. While not the sales obliteration I was expecting with an all-new car and eight years of pent-up demand, a win is a win. I have no doubt that Ford will pull out all the stops for MY 2015, and that's something we can all thank Chevy (and, to a lesser extent, Dodge) for.
Old 1/21/12, 07:16 PM
  #19  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MARZ
The non-stop crap talk and excuses from the Camaro contingent since Ford announced the specifications for the 2013 GT500 doesn't bother me because fanboys will be fanboys. We heard it all before when Ford announced the 2011 Mustang 5.0L; the head-to-head reviews and performance specifications paint a picture completely different from what the Chevy crowd would have had you believe initially, you know, with the Camaro featuring the bigger, more-powerful engine, "superior" IRS, blah blah. However, when the source of the rhetoric is a high-profile GM executive like Al Oppenheiser, it just sounds pathetic, in my opinion. If your car's really so great, Al, let its performance speak for itself ("simulations"? Really??) Maybe I missed it, but I don't remember any high-profile Ford executives or engineers trashing GM, even despite the myriad of bad news with GM in the subject line over the past couple years (the Camaro being dead from 2002-10; GM's bankruptcy -- maybe they should have run their "how to run a company and keep from going bankrupt" simulations; the huge flop that is the Volt -- take your pick). Ford Mustang fans should thank GM for making the Camaro? The Camaro wouldn't exist if not for the Mustang, both initially and in its new, two-ton modern iteration. And, congratulations to Chevy for outselling a Mustang that has looked pretty much the same since MY 2005. While not the sales obliteration I was expecting with an all-new car and eight years of pent-up demand, a win is a win. I have no doubt that Ford will pull out all the stops for MY 2015, and that's something we can all thank Chevy (and, to a lesser extent, Dodge) for.
THIS.

Should be stickied at the top of every thread involving the camaro here. If only that were possible lol
Old 1/22/12, 04:41 AM
  #20  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Thomas S's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
MARZ, I thoroughly enjoy your posts and would subscribe to your newsletter!


Quick Reply: You can't fix stupid in Camp Camaro...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 AM.