General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

Old charger vs new charger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/14/04, 11:09 AM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
VintagMustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 9, 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw this weekend Blade Trinity that’s in the theater right now. He drives and old bad to the bone charger. I can't believe that Dodge is making a 4-door car and calling it the charger. Do they even know what they used to build? Maybe we need to send them a picture of it or something. Sounds like the charger went the way of the GTO :bang: If Ford did this to the mustang I would vomit.

Here is a pic of Blade's ride :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Old 12/14/04, 11:12 AM
  #2  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
VintagMustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 9, 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now the new one
Old 12/15/04, 06:55 PM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
Rakshas's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saw a jet black magnum with 20's the other day, Guy had blacked out the grill and the tint as well, Looked sexy as heck.

Now if the WAGON looks sexy, the sedan can only look better.

People underestimate the new charger and overestimate the old, IMO the old ones were fugly anyway.
Old 12/15/04, 11:07 PM
  #4  
V6 Member
 
64&94Stangs's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 3, 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with you Rak.. the old Mopar designs were exactly why i didn't like Mopar, but now with the 300 and the Magnum, I'm hooked. I can't say the new Charger is jawdropping, but lets see it after it gets out of the gate, I bet it'll look better in person.
Old 12/16/04, 08:21 AM
  #5  
Cobra R Member
 
mustang_sallad's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think its an awesome car, if they had named it anything else, I bet we'd all like it. I mean think about it! DC has gone from a goofy, cab-forward, fwd intrepid to this muscular, long hood short deck, v8 powered rwd sedan. That's just not a very flattering colour.
Old 12/16/04, 08:53 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
68notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with you, Vintage; car manufacturers recycling the muscle car monikers of yore (e.g. GTO, Charger) is lame. The old Charger kicks serious tail, the new one, well, yikes.
Old 12/16/04, 05:51 PM
  #7  
GT Member
 
captin kapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
at least it will be miles better than the Intrepid...
Old 12/18/04, 05:15 PM
  #8  
I Have Admin Envy
 
Galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is nothing wrong with reviving a nameplate, as long as it pays tribute to the original car.

While the Charger name is blasphemous on a 4-door in the eyes of most, people don't remember that the name was also tacked onto the Cordoba in the 70's and FWD econoboxes in the early 80's, that's even worse in my book.

I do still believe it would have been better if it was called the Coronet or Magnum sedan. They should have saved the Charger name if they ever built a 2-door coupe on the LX chassis.
Old 12/19/04, 12:37 AM
  #9  
Cobra R Member
 
mustang_sallad's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds poifect steve... call this thing the magnum, with both a sedan and wagon, and build a two door off the same chassis, call THAT the charger. go call mr chrysler.
Old 12/19/04, 08:57 AM
  #10  
V6 Member
 
426H's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Galaxie@December 18, 2004, 6:18 PM

I do still believe it would have been better if it was called the Coronet or Magnum sedan. They should have saved the Charger name if they ever built a 2-door coupe on the LX chassis.
Good point! It is stupid to dilute the Charger name even more with this 4-door car.
Old 12/19/04, 09:46 AM
  #11  
GT Member
 
Dan66's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 15, 2004
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rakshas@December 15, 2004, 7:58 PM
... the old ones were fugly anyway.
You have GOT to be kidding! The 68/69 Charger is one of the most aggressive and well-designed muscle cars to ever roll off the line! How can you possibly say it's ugly?!?!
Old 12/19/04, 01:19 PM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
Rakshas's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No way,

I just cannot say this car is goodlooking. Is has nothing on the GM cars of the same time periods.

Ugly


Beautifullly styled.



Old 12/19/04, 02:27 PM
  #13  
V6 Member
 
426H's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rakshas@December 19, 2004, 2:22 PM
Is has nothing on the GM cars of the same time periods.
Styling is subjective, this ain't:

Old 12/19/04, 05:24 PM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
Rakshas's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many cars were actually built with the hemi? Barely any.

The majority of chargers used smaller motors.

Everyoen talks as if every charger was a firebreathing god of a car, the majority were not very fast.

That's like saying every chevelle was a beast becasue of the LS6 option.
Old 12/20/04, 08:57 PM
  #15  
GT Member
 
muscleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 10, 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really disappointed about the new charger. If DC did the same retro-future thing that Ford did with the Stang I would seriously consider buying one. It is very similar to the situation with the new GTO.
Old 12/24/04, 10:13 PM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
lilbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2004
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i kno i'm a ford man but that chevelle SS aint bad
Old 12/30/04, 06:20 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
ahh the chevelle, my favorite cheby. buts still nothing compared to a stang....

now this:

VS


actually, looking at the front end/grille and the overall shape, the charger n goat are VERY similiar
so how is one ugly n the other not???
Old 12/30/04, 09:18 PM
  #18  
Bullitt Member
 
matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 4, 2004
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't much like that sort of 70's style anyhow. Late 60s were great, but they just got wierd in the 70s. That hump in the back, the blunt, caved in front ends .. just odd.
Old 1/3/05, 05:32 AM
  #19  
V6 Member
 
426H's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rakshas@December 19, 2004, 6:27 PM
How many cars were actually built with the hemi? Barely any.
11000 cars were built with the "street" hemi from '66 to '71.
And you can't compare LS6 cars to hemi cars. But the ZL1 was pretty close...
Old 1/5/05, 12:30 PM
  #20  
Mach 1 Member
 
63galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Challenger was the most aggressive Dodge of the Muscle car era IMO...SuperBee's rocked also, but the Challenger just had an awesome stance that was intimidatiing


Quick Reply: Old charger vs new charger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.