Mustang Fusions
#1
Mustang Fusions
![](http://www.moddedmustangs.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/tractorri-lamborghini-mustang.jpg)
![](http://www.fquick.com/images/articles/8921.jpg)
This is a Fusion of a Gallardo and a GT. Sexy on the outside, sexy on the inside.
![Banana](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/banana.gif)
![](http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/4692/mustang4dgn1.jpg)
This is a Charger Mustang
![](http://rookery2.viary.com/storagev12/919000/919030_367b_625x1000.jpg)
This is a VW Beetle-Mustang fusion.
![](https://cache.jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2006/11/giugiaro%20Mustang%20Concept.jpg)
This is a Guigiaro Stang, but you gotta admit it looks like a Cama... Cammie... Kamario... I forgot what it's called... It escapes me...
Any comments on these pictures?
Last edited by Evil_Capri; 10/13/09 at 04:52 AM.
#3
No? "NO"!? That's all you can say? Hey, at least the Guigiaro, come on. It just looks like an honest car. That Gallardo-GT is beautiful. And the Gallardo's 3-section tail lights match the Mustang. The beatle is horrible, though. And the Charger Mustang? We need a 4 door stang. Remember, the mustang has alays been about options...
Last edited by Metrionix; 10/13/09 at 02:04 PM.
#4
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and yet you posted the beetle.![Screwy](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/screwy.gif)
Guigiaro is nice but not feeling the Gallardo rear.
And no we do not need a 4 door Mustang. Tha's what the Fusion is for
![Screwy](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/screwy.gif)
Guigiaro is nice but not feeling the Gallardo rear.
And no we do not need a 4 door Mustang. Tha's what the Fusion is for
![Big Grin](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Last edited by Knight Rider; 10/13/09 at 02:07 PM.
#6
Post *****
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
all of those, minus the last (which has its own seperate design flaws) are craptastic.
The lambostang has no flow. Tribar tailights you say? disillusioned minds eye seeing what it wants to see i say. The sharp angles of the back end have nothing in common with the front. third brake like looks ridiculous and the bottom of the bumper is completely out of tune with what a mustangs rear bumper should be. even the haters of the glack diaper have to admit that its not this bad. if this were a design excercise in any design school it would have failed.
the "charger mustang" really has nothing from the charger in it at all.. its just a stretched mustang with an extra pair of doors. and again, it doesnt flow. the greenhouse has been totally boned by the stretch and the glass of the read door doesnt look good at all. hips start waaay too soon.
the bug is just ludicrous
The lambostang has no flow. Tribar tailights you say? disillusioned minds eye seeing what it wants to see i say. The sharp angles of the back end have nothing in common with the front. third brake like looks ridiculous and the bottom of the bumper is completely out of tune with what a mustangs rear bumper should be. even the haters of the glack diaper have to admit that its not this bad. if this were a design excercise in any design school it would have failed.
the "charger mustang" really has nothing from the charger in it at all.. its just a stretched mustang with an extra pair of doors. and again, it doesnt flow. the greenhouse has been totally boned by the stretch and the glass of the read door doesnt look good at all. hips start waaay too soon.
the bug is just ludicrous
#11
Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
No? "NO"!? That's all you can say? Hey, at least the Guigiaro, come on. It just looks like an honest car. That Gallardo-GT is beautiful. And the Gallardo's 3-section tail lights match the Mustang. The beatle is horrible, though. And the Charger Mustang? We need a 4 door stang. Remember, the mustang has alays been about options...
"Hey, houtex, do you like any of those cars?"
"No."
"Oh, ok, well, there ya go."
Pretty simple, actually, when you get down to it. And it just proves the point... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Do not attempt to sway me, I'll not attempt to sway you.
/Although the idea of a 4 door Mustang is flogging worthy... so watch it.
![Big Grin](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#16
Yes, in fact, Mextrionix, that's about all I can say. Sums it up. As in:
"Hey, houtex, do you like any of those cars?"
"No."
"Oh, ok, well, there ya go."
Pretty simple, actually, when you get down to it. And it just proves the point... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Do not attempt to sway me, I'll not attempt to sway you.
/Although the idea of a 4 door Mustang is flogging worthy... so watch it.![Big Grin](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
"Hey, houtex, do you like any of those cars?"
"No."
"Oh, ok, well, there ya go."
Pretty simple, actually, when you get down to it. And it just proves the point... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Do not attempt to sway me, I'll not attempt to sway you.
/Although the idea of a 4 door Mustang is flogging worthy... so watch it.
![Big Grin](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)