General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
Topnotch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/bu...11auto.html?hp
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #2  
GrnT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2008
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 109
From: Apple Valley Mn.
Alot of people would loose jobs don't you think.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #3  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
I think AB's pic says it all:


And yes, MANY people would lose their jobs. Brands would have HUGE changes:
Pontiac-Gone/aborbed into Dodge Cars.
Hummer-gone/Absorbed into Jeep (there is Irony).
Buick-Gone/absorbed into Chrysler.
Saturn-?
GMC-Gone/absorbed into Dodge Trucks.
Mayhem.

Last edited by Moosetang; Oct 10, 2008 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #4  
69CaliStang's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 2
From: Northern Cali
Agreed... There is too much redundancy. Things are getting bad. This economic situation had better improve or we are likely to see things we never dreamed of...


Originally Posted by Moosetang
I think AB's pic says it all:


And yes, MANY people would lose their jobs. Brands would have HUGE changes:
Pontiac-Gone/aborbed into Dodge Cars.
Hummer-gone/Absorbed into Jeep (there is Irony).
Buick-Gone/absorbed into Chrysler.
Saturn-?
GMC-Gone/absorbed into Dodge Trucks.
Mayhem.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:28 PM
  #5  
GrnT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2008
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 109
From: Apple Valley Mn.
Dodge Camero. Chevy Challenger. Comallenger, Challengero.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 65
From: Colorado
Pontiac Challenger!? lol sorry I know people have already had fun with the names thing...

Chevrolet Caravan, GMC Ram. Chevrolet Sebring. GMC Nitro. OK im done.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #7  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Chevrolet Viper Corvette Z06/SRT10
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #8  
GrnT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2008
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 109
From: Apple Valley Mn.
Dodge G8 SRT8
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #9  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Cadillac Imperial. Chrysler Camaro.

Yuck...this is creeping me out. Good thing there's a snowball's chance in hell it will happen.

Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; Oct 11, 2008 at 01:42 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #10  
poldrv's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 2, 2004
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 1
From: West Kelowna, British Columbia
It would be a short life for the new camaro and the new challenger. What would they call there do combined sports car hmmmmm "challaro" maybe?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #11  
watchdevil's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2008
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
The only thing worth having of Chrysler's is the Jeep brand... The rest can go the way of AMC...

I can see it now... Another version of GM's Lambda badged as a Dodge or Jeep...

Last edited by watchdevil; Oct 11, 2008 at 09:17 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
That would be weird.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #13  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Yeah. It'll never happen. The next thing you know they'll be saying Volkswagen owns Lamboghini and Bentley, Tata owns Jaguar and Land Rover, and BMW owns Rolls-Royce, cause that would be just crazy.




Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #14  
Von Bek's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
When you're at $4 a share, you had better be looking to cut redundancy. GM should be looking at survival, not how long a particular name has been around. Ford is in the same boat, aside from names, is there really much difference between a Ford or a Lincoln or a Mercury?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #15  
Silver99v6's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2006
Posts: 504
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Von Bek
When you're at $4 a share, you had better be looking to cut redundancy. GM should be looking at survival, not how long a particular name has been around. Ford is in the same boat, aside from names, is there really much difference between a Ford or a Lincoln or a Mercury?
I agree... Yes there will be jobs lost, but you have to look at the long run. Not as many people would lose there jobs with a merger than with two companies going under.

I don't like the idea of a merger, but they have to do what they have to do...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #16  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
According to what I read, GM called Ford first, but Ford stated they can survive on their own. I believe all 3 of these companies will need to somehow put their long standing rivalries aside and find ways to cooperate in order to survive.

As far as the economy is concerned, we certainly have the perfect storm going on for the automotive industry. The dried up credit along with fuel costs and painfully non-fuel efficient product lines from all of the big 3 could quite possibly signify someone's doom. The lack of response with regard to product is undoubtedly going to produce unfriendly fallout. At what point does Ford not have enough staff to actually produce and bring products to market? There are only so many jobs you can cut before a company that size simply cannot function.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 01:50 AM
  #17  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by watchdevil
The only thing worth having of Chrysler's is the Jeep brand.

Which is pretty much what GM just offered, keep Jeep and the minivans and deep six the rest.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 01:59 AM
  #18  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
The fact of the matter is that Cerberus has 51% ownership of GM and is trying to muscle them into buying Chrysler. GM doesn't really want any part of this.

Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; Oct 19, 2008 at 04:51 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 02:25 AM
  #19  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
No kidding they need to deep six several marques them selves not add more but just read a news scoop on that deal. No word on whether they will take it or not.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 04:48 AM
  #20  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Slims00ls1z28
No kidding they need to deep six several marques them selves not add more but just read a news scoop on that deal. No word on whether they will take it or not.
Yep, Saab and Buick and Pontiac need to go away. In today's market, all GM needs is Chevy and Cadillac.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.