General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

First Jaguar SUV/Crossover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/7/13, 09:08 AM
  #1  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First Jaguar SUV/Crossover





Old 9/7/13, 09:15 AM
  #2  
Post *****
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,153
Received 72 Likes on 65 Posts
Might as well . . . almost everybody else has!
Old 9/7/13, 10:24 AM
  #3  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Looks like a Jaguar Cayenne...
Old 9/7/13, 10:26 AM
  #4  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're about 15 years too late.
Old 9/7/13, 10:26 AM
  #5  
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Flagstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Sun City AZ
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
looks good!

but

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


Jaaaaags are not for SUV'ing
Old 9/7/13, 10:27 AM
  #6  
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Flagstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Sun City AZ
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Zastava_101
They're about 15 years too late.
so they are 2000 and late?
Old 9/7/13, 10:28 AM
  #7  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Flagstang
looks good!

but

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Jaaaaags are not for SUV'ing
That's what Land Rover is for. They're even owned by the same company, and LR uses the Jag engines. I don't see the point.
Old 9/9/13, 09:54 AM
  #8  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
BA Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I really like it. They posted pics from the unveiling on instagram about 30 minutes ago.


Last edited by BA Mustang; 9/9/13 at 09:56 AM.
Old 9/9/13, 10:06 AM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
tukatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,324
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
and LR uses the Jag engines.
If they do, that's new. The Land Rover V8 was a lump that was used in other cars like the Morgan Plus 8 and put out all of about 200 HP. The first generation Jaguar XK8 ('98 on for several years) had a 4.0L DOHC V8 that put out 290/290.
Old 9/9/13, 11:45 AM
  #10  
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Flagstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Sun City AZ
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
nice blue
Old 9/9/13, 12:20 PM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by tukatz
If they do, that's new. The Land Rover V8 was a lump that was used in other cars like the Morgan Plus 8 and put out all of about 200 HP. The first generation Jaguar XK8 ('98 on for several years) had a 4.0L DOHC V8 that put out 290/290.
Lol ummm not in the past 15 years. Prior to Jag/Ford engineered engines, they used BMW V8s.
Old 9/9/13, 12:59 PM
  #12  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts






Old 9/9/13, 01:22 PM
  #13  
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Flagstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Sun City AZ
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
its looking better and better
Old 9/9/13, 01:39 PM
  #14  
Cobra Member
 
tukatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,324
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
Lol ummm not in the past 15 years. Prior to Jag/Ford engineered engines, they used BMW V8s.
My turn to LOL. Google Land Rover V8 engines and you will learn that the Land Rover V8 started life as the Buick 215, the tooling for which was purchased from GM by Land Rover in 1965. Rover originally produced it as a 3.5L and used it in the Range Rover from 1970-1989 and in the Discovery from 1989-2004. The 3.9/4.0L was used in the Range Rover from 1989-2003. In 1996 they bumped it to 4.6L and used it in the Range Rover and the Discovery. They continued to produce the engine until 2005. The 3.5L produced 158 HP, the 4.0 190, and the 4.6 225.
Old 9/9/13, 02:38 PM
  #15  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by tukatz
My turn to LOL. Google Land Rover V8 engines and you will learn that the Land Rover V8 started life as the Buick 215, the tooling for which was purchased from GM by Land Rover in 1965. Rover originally produced it as a 3.5L and used it in the Range Rover from 1970-1989 and in the Discovery from 1989-2004. The 3.9/4.0L was used in the Range Rover from 1989-2003. In 1996 they bumped it to 4.6L and used it in the Range Rover and the Discovery. They continued to produce the engine until 2005. The 3.5L produced 158 HP, the 4.0 190, and the 4.6 225.
Ok, so the last 10* years, not 15. Point is - Land Rover *now* uses almost exclusively Jaguar engines, which were mostly engineered when they were both owned by Ford.
Old 9/9/13, 05:39 PM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
tukatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,324
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
That is true. The bigger issue to me is the absurdity of every marque having to have an SUV. I recall when GM still had all of its product line and Cadillac had to have not just an SUV, but a pickup truck as well. A Cadillac pickup truck????? Now that's ridiculous.
Old 9/10/13, 08:50 AM
  #17  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tukatz
That is true. The bigger issue to me is the absurdity of every marque having to have an SUV.
Why is that an issue? SUVs/Crossovers are still very popular and still bring big profits.

Originally Posted by tukatz
I recall when GM still had all of its product line and Cadillac had to have not just an SUV, but a pickup truck as well. A Cadillac pickup truck????? Now that's ridiculous.
Why is that ridiculous?

I actually like Escalade pickup better than Escalade SUV.

By the way, Lincoln also sells a luxury pickup truck, Mark LT (in Mexico).



Old 9/10/13, 10:16 AM
  #18  
Cobra Member
 
tukatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,324
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
I guess I've just always viewed pickup trucks as being utilitarian. I just can't see the owner of a Cadillac pickup using it to pick up a load of manure. To me it makes as much sense as the guys who buy these big, jacked up, four-wheel drive, off-road pickup trucks and never take them off of pavement
Old 9/10/13, 10:34 AM
  #19  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tukatz
I just can't see the owner of a Cadillac pickup using it to pick up a load of manure.
They will probably never use it for that, but might use it for things like this ...

Name:  Untitled_zpsed22195b.jpg
Views: 258
Size:  90.4 KB
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BavarianStang
Ford Discussions
0
9/5/15 05:55 AM
Evil_Capri
Ford Discussions
8
8/10/06 07:23 PM
mustangfun101
General Vehicle Discussion/News
17
3/30/05 07:37 AM
jgsmuzzy
General Vehicle Discussion/News
10
1/20/05 10:30 AM



Quick Reply: First Jaguar SUV/Crossover



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 PM.