General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

Dodge Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/11/06, 12:36 PM
  #21  
V6 Member
 
chocophile's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005+ Stangs are 188 inches, according to edmunds.com. According to the same source, 2004 Stangs are even shorter: 183.2 inches.
Old 1/11/06, 02:56 PM
  #22  
Bullitt Member
 
Montrose's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 16, 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Challenger concept is nice. I was in high school in the 60's, etc. (to let you know my age) and when I saw the concept car, I immediately recognized the original car. In fact, there's an original one near me, in red.

I can say the same for the new Mustang (which is why I bought one)

I definitely can't say the same for the Camaro concept car. There is very little about this design that has any recognition value.
Old 1/11/06, 05:49 PM
  #23  
Team Mustang Source
 
Thunder Road's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 7, 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by harleybill@January 10, 2006, 2:03 PM
I think it will definitely compete with the stang if they can keep it in the same price ballpark (which won't be easy).... Far better than the current cammaro which I hope Chevy has some finishing touches. Last thing they need is another GTO ho ho.

"IF" they build it theres not a chance in heck it will be in the same price ballpark.
Old 1/11/06, 05:53 PM
  #24  
MSP
Banned
 
MSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2005
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Thunder Road@January 11, 2006, 4:52 PM
"IF" they build it theres not a chance in heck it will be in the same price ballpark.
Also, if they build it, most people will buy the 5.7L version, as opposed to the widley loved 6.1L version.. If they make the car with only the 6.1L they are gonna be in big trouble...

So expect a V6 to hit the market, and a 5.7L as well... Those will sell like hotcakes...

Only a very few people will buy a 6.1L Challenger for $40+ K... Its too risky... The most common situation will be a $27,000K 5.7L... Everyone will have one... The 6.1L that we are all drooling over will be far and few between...
Old 1/12/06, 07:19 AM
  #25  
Legacy TMS Member
 
MilStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by MSP@January 11, 2006, 6:56 PM
Also, if they build it, most people will buy the 5.7L version, as opposed to the widley loved 6.1L version.. If they make the car with only the 6.1L they are gonna be in big trouble...

So expect a V6 to hit the market, and a 5.7L as well... Those will sell like hotcakes...

Only a very few people will buy a 6.1L Challenger for $40+ K... Its too risky... The most common situation will be a $27,000K 5.7L... Everyone will have one... The 6.1L that we are all drooling over will be far and few between...
Definitely agree with you on that. The 5.7L ones will be the more likely to see around town.

...but that is still nice!

Old 1/12/06, 10:08 AM
  #26  
Team Mustang Source
 
ex-Galaxie500's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 8, 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it goes into production, if things do well, I'll be riding in one
Old 1/14/06, 12:14 AM
  #27  
Member
 
67fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 11, 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO, this challenger looks way too retro, almost a copy of the original. If Dodge can't think of a new design, they recycle the old. At least Ford had the creativity to design the new mustang so that it's modern, but also reflects enough design cues from the 65-70 mustang to be instantly recognized as a mustang. The mustang looks to me like it should look - a process of design evolution, keeping its heritage but also bringing it into the 21st century.

This new challenger looks like a slighty larger remake of the 1970 Challenger. I guess Dodge is learning from the new Charger - their attempt to go retro/modern with the design has been widely criticized, so on the Challenger they have bagged the modern and just stuck with retro - but I'm sure it will be more successful than the Charger. I'll stick with my mustang. Just my two cents.
Old 1/14/06, 06:18 AM
  #28  
Legacy TMS Member
 
MilStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that the Mustang has more fluid lines and meshes retro and new together very well. I will definitely stick with my Mustang over the Challenger. ..but I would not mind having both.

Old 1/15/06, 08:34 AM
  #29  
Member
 
johnnyblaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After going to the show and seeing the Challenger compared to the GT500, the Challenger makes the Shelby look cheap. The Challenger is just a massive, stunning car. I like the Shelby but the cheap looking plastic around the bottom of the car Really hurts the overall look. If I had to pick one, I would have no problem picking the Challenger.

And by the way the Camaro was a huge disappointment.
Old 1/16/06, 08:03 AM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
Airwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 29, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares if its a copy of the old one? It looks sweet. Detroit is catching on, the mustang looks like a mustang, the challenger looks like a challenger, the charger is a huge failure in my opinion, and they need to fix the camaro's grille. After that everything should be good.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AdPock
General Mustang Chat
7
10/16/15 02:58 PM
50Cal
Introductions
6
9/17/15 06:43 PM
BavarianStang
Ford Discussions
0
9/5/15 05:55 AM
Beavis9000
2010-2014 Mustang
22
8/10/15 12:16 PM



Quick Reply: Dodge Challenger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.