General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

370Z 3000 lbs 350 HP

Old May 6, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
matko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
370Z 3000 lbs 350 HP

Funny headlights.
Attached Thumbnails 370Z  3000 lbs  350 HP-z.jpg  
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Still ugly.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
adrenalin's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 2
I was going to buy a 350Z prior to getting my 05' stang. I liked them back then and I like the looks of the 370Z. Looking forward to seeing them on the street.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #4  
matko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
expect pricing to jump to the mid $30's.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #5  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Somthing i thought ford needs to do with the stang is decrease dimensions to lower weight.

All good stuff but with the increase in price still no threat to the stang.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Knight
Somthing i thought ford needs to do with the stang is decrease dimensions to lower weight.

All good stuff but with the increase in price still no threat to the stang.
I agree, the pony cars when they arrived were much smaller than their modern day counterparts. They need to go back to that formula. Fox body size or smaller. That would make it much easier to achieve upcomming fuel concerns.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by Knight
Somthing i thought ford needs to do with the stang is decrease dimensions to lower weight.

All good stuff but with the increase in price still no threat to the stang.
Uh, you all know that comparing the Z to the Mustang in terms of size and weight is like comparing apples vs oranges? Remember, the Z is a 2 seater, and a smaller car at that, so it should weigh less. Plus, you can't even get a couple sets of normal suitcases (or 2 sets of golf clubs) in the Z with that rear suspension brace! So this doesn't suprise me in the least that they made the car lighter.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #8  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
Uh, you all know that comparing the Z to the Mustang in terms of size and weight is like comparing apples vs oranges? Remember, the Z is a 2 seater, and a smaller car at that, so it should weigh less. Plus, you can't even get a couple sets of normal suitcases (or 2 sets of golf clubs) in the Z with that rear suspension brace! So this doesn't suprise me in the least that they made the car lighter.
Yeah but the 350z when it debuted was aimed at the pony car market dispite the differences in the cars.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #9  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
While I wouldn't expect the '14(?) Stang to be sized with the 2-seat 370Z, I too think it does need to be siginificantly downsized and more importantly, spend a few weeks at the fat farm. Gas is not likely to get cheaper - will probably get even more expensive actually, CAFE ain't going away and the air ain't gonna clean itself up.

I think the next couple of years will be somewhat similar to the early '70s. Hopefully, this time, in stead of coming up with a dreadful Mustang II sled, Ford will act aggressively to meet these challenges head on rather than reactively, as then.

There's no reason a 2+2 sport coupe should weigh more than 3200 lbs max, for which 375-400hp would be more than sufficient - the 4,000lb 500+hp GT500 is just ridiculous. Couple that with a lightening fast 6 to 8 speed DSG-type tranny make the most of the power and a fully modern suspension to far better utilize and maintain the speed generated down any road in far greater safety and comfort than today.

Yes, such pony cars would be different, of necessity, than today's hulking, overpowered blunderbusses, but they could and should be as quick, even more exciting, and more involving yet clean and efficient performance cars rather than the dray pig the Mustang II was.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #10  
lowblustang00's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 18
From: Central Alabama
What is up with the new headlamp designs at Nissan? The new Maxima design is similar. Right now I don't care for it.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #11  
ScottyBoy302's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2005
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: BC
Any car that manages to lose weight these days gets an A+ from me. 350hp aint too bad either.
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #12  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by rhumb
There's no reason a 2+2 sport coupe should weigh more than 3200 lbs max, for which 375-400hp would be more than sufficient - the 4,000lb 500+hp GT500 is just ridiculous. Couple that with a lightening fast 6 to 8 speed DSG-type tranny make the most of the power and a fully modern suspension to far better utilize and maintain the speed generated down any road in far greater safety and comfort than today.
We would all like to believe what you say, but with all the safety items that are now mandatory for cars, added weight is a given. Nothing we can do about it. Just look at the Nissan GT-R. That car has a curb weight of over 3,800 pounds but is INSANE fast, with 0-60 times of 3.3-3.5! More than 480 hp is under that hood. My point is its loaded with safety, nice options and other items.

But the point I'm trying to make, is that the cars are going to be heavier, and all the safety items (and options we all like to have) are the culpurate. To be honest, 3,200 lbs for a 2+2 isn't realistic for a normally priced car, like a Mustang. Heck, the 599 Ferrari weighs almost 3,800 lbs and its aluminum and carbon fiber!
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
StangMahn's Avatar
NTTAWWT
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 14,456
Likes: 35
From: That town you drive through to get to Myrtle Beach
it doesnt look too bad

yeah, weight is not going to be easy to deal away with the safety stuff, older cars could be lighter weight because they didnt have airbags, abs, computer driver assists, power steering, etc
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #14  
cheech6g's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
I like the current one a lot better. Is that picture the actual car or is it just a rendering? The decrease in weight is certainly a nice move......but at that price, I'd take the G37 any day of the week. At least that car looks nice, and its got a back seat you can use.

ps.....lowblustang00, your car looks awesome, I love that color. Only color I'd choose over electric green
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #15  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
My worry is that, if weight doesn't come down, then performance inevitably will. I think the age of ever bigger, more powerful motors to heave ever fatter, more ponderous cars down the road are soon coming to an end. Newer engine technologies will give some respite, but inevitably, with CAFE, OPEC, EPA and whatnot, if weight doesn't budge downwards, then, like the '70's, performance will.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #16  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
I say Ford Stamp the entire stang outta aluminum. prob loss 300lbs right there.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #17  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by Knight
I say Ford Stamp the entire stang outta aluminum. prob loss 300lbs right there.
I wonder if they working toward that in the future, starting with the hood on the S197s. Aluminum is lot different to work with than steel, it has a lot of odd quirks when compared to steel.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #18  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by lowblustang00
What is up with the new headlamp designs at Nissan? The new Maxima design is similar. Right now I don't care for it.
Yeah, it looks odd doesn't it?
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #19  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Nice specs but..

God ****... those headlights need some work. That point coming in from the fender just ruins the look of an overall good looking car
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 07:18 PM
  #20  
titanjc's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2007
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Wow. Less weight + more power = WIN. Good job on that Nissan. Now go fix those headlights!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.