General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

2006 Ford Ranger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/25/05, 06:49 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Roadster2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Found this at the local dealership. To be honest even its a small revision i like this look alot



Old 5/25/05, 08:55 PM
  #2  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
ManEHawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is looking really good, I am a huge Ranger fan!
Old 5/26/05, 12:26 AM
  #3  
Mach 1 Member
 
GT40 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
nice, now weres that 2006 mustang order guide?
Old 5/27/05, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
nice, i've always liked rangers, and that looks pretty sweet!
Old 6/6/05, 06:44 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
The Deviant One's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 7, 2004
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:shock: Looks more like a Nissan Frontier. I hope those fender flares and plastic side moldings are only an option. Sorry, this just doesn't do it for me and I've been a long time Ranger fan. It looks ugly and cheap. :notnice:

BTW, Arin...I noticed you got a II. Good for you bro. Can't wait till you drop that 351W. It's gonna be one bad ***** on the road
Old 6/6/05, 07:34 PM
  #6  
I Have Admin Envy
 
Galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They need a major overhaul of the ranger if they want to keep control of the small pickup market.

I am going to predict this will be a more important market segment as gas prices increase.
Old 6/7/05, 07:04 PM
  #7  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by 03muzzy6@June 6, 2005, 6:47 PM
:shock: Looks more like a Nissan Frontier. I hope those fender flares and plastic side moldings are only an option. Sorry, this just doesn't do it for me and I've been a long time Ranger fan. It looks ugly and cheap. :notnice:

BTW, Arin...I noticed you got a II. Good for you bro. Can't wait till you drop that 351W. It's gonna be one bad ***** on the road
thanks dude!

im gonna look for a 351W at a junkyard as soon as school gets out. and when i say as soon as school gets out i mean, when the bell reings its off to picknpull lol

Old 6/8/05, 12:09 AM
  #8  
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Autotooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 6, 2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
me likey...
Old 6/10/05, 11:32 AM
  #9  
Member
 
DAWAKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they dont need a major overhaul of the ranger. check it out. the explorer (same frame) has a 3valve 5.4 in it. 300 hp. why not put this in the ranger and say bye bye to the hemi's. it wouldn't take much to be a player in the small truck segment. com'n ford
Old 6/12/05, 07:47 PM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Roadster2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uhm the explorer has a 3 valve 4.6 liter v8 that produces 292 horsepower not a 5.4 liter in it
Old 6/13/05, 10:38 AM
  #11  
Cobra R Member
 
mustang_sallad's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe he meant the aviator, i think that ones got the 5.4. But still, i don't think this pick up needs a 5.4 V8, that really goes against what Steve was suggesting. Sure the dakota's got a v8, but that things weird. "LARGEST, MOST POWERFUL COMPACT PICK UP!!" That's like someone getting into the guiness book of records for being the biggest midget.
I think the main problem with the Ranger is styling, but that's just me. I find it really dated, but i'm betting most people who buy this truck are really just looking for something functional. People looking to make a statement usually get something a lot bigger nowadays.
Old 6/14/05, 11:31 AM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
buzz_s281's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big fan of the Ranger. My first "new" vehicle was a '92 Ranger XLT regular cab, 2wd. I got over 218,000 miles before it finally died. Over 100,000 on the first set of tires, Firestones even! No air or pwd, pwl, but I loved that truck. If I could get another Ranger, I would, but a wife, 2 kids, and a Rotweiler will put a stop to that. Oh well, guess I will have to get a F-150 quad cab.
Old 6/20/05, 10:06 AM
  #13  
Bullitt Member
 
cobradude's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 20, 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mustang_sallad@June 13, 2005, 11:41 AM
maybe he meant the aviator, i think that ones got the 5.4. But still, i don't think this pick up needs a 5.4 V8, that really goes against what Steve was suggesting. Sure the dakota's got a v8, but that things weird. "LARGEST, MOST POWERFUL COMPACT PICK UP!!" That's like someone getting into the guiness book of records for being the biggest midget.
I think the main problem with the Ranger is styling, but that's just me. I find it really dated, but i'm betting most people who buy this truck are really just looking for something functional. People looking to make a statement usually get something a lot bigger nowadays.
im pretty sure the aviator uses the 4.6L
Old 6/20/05, 10:12 AM
  #14  
Team Mustang Source
 
1999 Black 35th GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by cobradude@June 20, 2005, 12:09 PM
im pretty sure the aviator uses the 4.6L
Yep... 4.6 liter 32 valve Intech engine rated at 302 hp and 300 lb./ft of torque.
Old 6/20/05, 08:42 PM
  #15  
Team Mustang Source
 
bigred0383's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Aviator has the best engine (second best looks) in the entire FoMoCo SUV lineup (right ahead of the Expedition [best looks, second best engine] with the new 5.4L 3Valve). Too bad they didn't give it a low range, otherwise it would be perfect.
Old 6/21/05, 12:37 AM
  #16  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 56 Likes on 45 Posts
i like that they put the grille of its bigger brothers on it. and the two tone cladding...nice!
Old 6/21/05, 01:44 AM
  #17  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
ManEHawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rangers need more power, my dad is in the market for a compact pickup and noted toyota's 2.7L 4cly matched and slightly beat the Ranger 3.0 in hp @ torque, all while being priced lower.
He agrees the Toyota is ugly as sin, but wants function over form. I guess it just put me in a point where I was ashamed at Ford. Still a strong supporter though.
Old 6/21/05, 08:51 AM
  #18  
Team Mustang Source
 
1999 Black 35th GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you are correct about the engine specs but heres some other info I found.

Toyota Tacoma failed the NHTSA rollover test for 2004 and...

Toyota. From the "Just When We Thought They Were Invincible" File comes news that Toyota - otherwise known as the "Sultans of Swat" and those "Can't Miss Kids" - is recalling 880,000 SUVs and trucks worldwide due to problems with the front suspension. The problem stems from a defective ball joint, which can make the vehicles difficult to steer. The recall includes 2001-2004 model year Tacoma trucks, 2001-2002 4Runners, and 2002-2004 models of the Sequoia and Tundra
Ranger 04 recalls: 0

I did check base pricing on Edmunds and they are almost identical.


Ultimately you're Dad should get what he wants though no matter what it may be, I just thought I would share. Good luck
Old 6/21/05, 05:12 PM
  #19  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rangers are nice trucks, but they need optional V8. If Dakota can have V8, I don't see the reason why Ranger can't.
Old 6/22/05, 01:02 AM
  #20  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
ManEHawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1999 Black 35th GT@June 21, 2005, 7:54 AM
Yes, you are correct about the engine specs but heres some other info I found.

Toyota Tacoma failed the NHTSA rollover test for 2004 and...
Ranger 04 recalls: 0

I did check base pricing on Edmunds and they are almost identical.
Ultimately you're Dad should get what he wants though no matter what it may be, I just thought I would share. Good luck
Great info, I too want the Ranger really bad. I think seeing a Shiny Ranger at the lot VS a Tacoma on its lot can make an impact. We are test driving both as well. He also mentioned the greater towing and carrying capabilites from the Tacoma, man we'll see what happens.


Quick Reply: 2006 Ford Ranger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 AM.