Stock 2007 GT500 rwhp?
4/16/13 | 04:52 AM
#3
Cobra R Member
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
4/16/13 | 05:20 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
Joined: November 27, 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 1
From: Swansea, Mass.
Thanks, lmao at GT447.
A friend of mine has the GT500, i was wondering how close i'd be with a tune. It looks like 400 rwhp for me with a tune, so he's still got 50 more, it would be a real close race.
The only thing that might save me is gearing, i have 3:73's and he has 3:31's.
A friend of mine has the GT500, i was wondering how close i'd be with a tune. It looks like 400 rwhp for me with a tune, so he's still got 50 more, it would be a real close race.
The only thing that might save me is gearing, i have 3:73's and he has 3:31's.
4/16/13 | 05:30 AM
#5
Cobra Member
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Thanks, lmao at GT447.
A friend of mine has the GT500, i was wondering how close i'd be with a tune. It looks like 400 rwhp for me with a tune, so he's still got 50 more, it would be a real close race.
The only thing that might save me is gearing, i have 3:73's and he has 3:31's.
A friend of mine has the GT500, i was wondering how close i'd be with a tune. It looks like 400 rwhp for me with a tune, so he's still got 50 more, it would be a real close race.
The only thing that might save me is gearing, i have 3:73's and he has 3:31's.
4/16/13 | 11:44 AM
#6
Cobra R Member
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
You should be able to beat him. I raced a good friend with a 2007 GT500, He has a Lund tune, smaller pulley and a CAI and I was Stock, We both had drag radials.
He ran 11.82@120
I ran 11.92@115.5
This was our best runs of the day, so if he is stock you should get him. He weighs 3900
Read this article on a test of a 07GT500
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/shelby-g...oad-test1.html
He ran 11.82@120
I ran 11.92@115.5
This was our best runs of the day, so if he is stock you should get him. He weighs 3900
Read this article on a test of a 07GT500
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/shelby-g...oad-test1.html
Last edited by UnrealFord; 4/16/13 at 11:49 AM.
4/17/13 | 07:31 AM
#8
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 17
From: Bristol, TN
Ahhhh... the day I get to **** on Clarkson's grave for that
I've been arguing with some guy on TG's website about the dyno results. His opinion is pretty much that Shelbys are crap because they don't offer 500 rwhp from the factory "as proven by Top Gear". Well the 07-09 cars anyway.
Last edited by bob; 4/17/13 at 07:34 AM.
4/17/13 | 07:42 AM
#9
FR500 Member
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Ahhhh... the day I get to **** on Clarkson's grave for that
I've been arguing with some guy on TG's website about the dyno results. His opinion is pretty much that Shelbys are crap because they don't offer 500 rwhp from the factory "as proven by Top Gear". Well the 07-09 cars anyway.
4/17/13 | 07:34 PM
#10
Cobra R Member
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
Ahhhh... the day I get to **** on Clarkson's grave for that I've been arguing with some guy on TG's website about the dyno results. His opinion is pretty much that Shelbys are crap because they don't offer 500 rwhp from the factory "as proven by Top Gear". Well the 07-09 cars anyway.
I've been arguing with some guy on TG's website about the dyno results. His opinion is pretty much that Shelbys are crap because they don't offer 500 rwhp from the factory "as proven by Top Gear". Well the 07-09 cars anyway.
4/17/13 | 07:43 PM
#11
A Man Just Needs Some....
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 16,852
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
4/17/13 | 07:48 PM
#12
Cobra R Member
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
4/18/13 | 08:35 PM
#13
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 17
From: Bristol, TN
4/19/13 | 04:58 PM
#15
V6 Member
Joined: September 5, 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
4/25/13 | 11:19 AM
#19
Cobra Member
Joined: January 13, 2005
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 1
The 500 hp rating is at the flywheel NOT the rear wheel.
American cars always rate their hp numbers at the flywheel.
So 440 rwhp would actually be higher than 500 at the flywheel accounting for parasitic loss.
I raced a GT/CS with my car... not sure if it was a 2012, but it was brand new. He didn't beat me. He wasn't actually really that close.
I have an '06 with a GT500 drivetrain so I'm actually lighter than the CS I believe... but in any case that was the result.
If your friend is on stock Goodyear tires then yeah he'll likely have traction issues... if not then he probably won't at stock HP level.
I didn't have traction issues really until I did my blower swap... now it's fairly crazy with traction all the way through 3rd, but if he knows how to drive it won't really be an issue even then.
American cars always rate their hp numbers at the flywheel.
So 440 rwhp would actually be higher than 500 at the flywheel accounting for parasitic loss.
I raced a GT/CS with my car... not sure if it was a 2012, but it was brand new. He didn't beat me. He wasn't actually really that close.
I have an '06 with a GT500 drivetrain so I'm actually lighter than the CS I believe... but in any case that was the result.
If your friend is on stock Goodyear tires then yeah he'll likely have traction issues... if not then he probably won't at stock HP level.
I didn't have traction issues really until I did my blower swap... now it's fairly crazy with traction all the way through 3rd, but if he knows how to drive it won't really be an issue even then.
4/25/13 | 12:31 PM
#20
Cobra Member
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
The 500 hp rating is at the flywheel NOT the rear wheel.
American cars always rate their hp numbers at the flywheel.
So 440 rwhp would actually be higher than 500 at the flywheel accounting for parasitic loss.
I raced a GT/CS with my car... not sure if it was a 2012, but it was brand new. He didn't beat me. He wasn't actually really that close.
I have an '06 with a GT500 drivetrain so I'm actually lighter than the CS I believe... but in any case that was the result.
If your friend is on stock Goodyear tires then yeah he'll likely have traction issues... if not then he probably won't at stock HP level.
I didn't have traction issues really until I did my blower swap... now it's fairly crazy with traction all the way through 3rd, but if he knows how to drive it won't really be an issue even then.
American cars always rate their hp numbers at the flywheel.
So 440 rwhp would actually be higher than 500 at the flywheel accounting for parasitic loss.
I raced a GT/CS with my car... not sure if it was a 2012, but it was brand new. He didn't beat me. He wasn't actually really that close.
I have an '06 with a GT500 drivetrain so I'm actually lighter than the CS I believe... but in any case that was the result.
If your friend is on stock Goodyear tires then yeah he'll likely have traction issues... if not then he probably won't at stock HP level.
I didn't have traction issues really until I did my blower swap... now it's fairly crazy with traction all the way through 3rd, but if he knows how to drive it won't really be an issue even then.
Also 500 x 0.12 = 60. 500 - 60 = 440. And your "Shelby" is around 4k lbs so at least 300lbs heavier.
Nvm just noticed you said "Shelby drivetrain"
Last edited by steven46746; 4/25/13 at 12:46 PM.