2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Muffler DELETE, Pros and Cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
Purple Hayz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Two prefaces: First, I'm not terribly bothered by the exposed mufflers, so hold back the Second, I have little idea what the impacts on performance and sound decibles will be . That's why I'm floating this topic to all of you

So here goes.

Pros:

-minimal cost (in exhaust work, anyway.....hearing loss bills notwithstanding B) )
-pickup a few ponies (I'm thinking about 5)
-shed some weight
-clean up the view from the rear
-get to hear that killer muscle car sound everytime you fire it up


Cons:

-HAVE to hear that killer muscle car sound everytime you fire it up
-may alienate friends, neighbors, loved ones
-may go deaf (though I imagine the 05 is leagues above the SN95 in noise isolation and sound deadening, so maybe it will be tolerable from inside the car with the windows up )

I was also wondering if the huge decrease in back pressure could negatively effect the power output (isn't this the same argument against oversized exhaust systems?)


So that's my idea for the day. What's scary is that I'm actually half considering it. If that blown four-banger in the NEON (sorry....SRT-4) can pull it off (no mufflers), why can't our honkin 4.6 liter V8? Besides, having listened to that V10 Boss Mustang video about a hundred times, I must admit I find that deep, booming, snap-crackle-pop sound to be positively wicked!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:47 PM
  #2  
Shea's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Purple Hayz@July 22, 2004, 1:26 PM
I was also wondering if the huge decrease in back pressure could negatively effect the power output (isn't this the same argument against oversized exhaust systems?)
Absolutely the lack of backpressure would affect it. You need to study up on exhaust design before you attempt something which would alter it as severely as removing mufflers.

Ever wonder why equal length headers are so popular? Read up on exhaust pulses. I'm not saying that you can't overcome this issue through tuning, but it would take a LOT of tuning. A better way would be to remove the cats and keep the mufflers. The cats are your biggest restriction, and also your most heavy exhaust components, and, for that matter, they make your gas mileage go down as well.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:51 PM
  #3  
dallasw77's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
I agree with Shea, besides I'm not sure if it will sound that great w/o the mufflers....need more engine to make it sound good
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
don't do it.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #5  
crawFord Mustang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Depending on your locality. There will be two issues, unless you know a slimy mechanic.

Emissions checks
and
State Inspection

Won't pass either.

Sure, people often do it, but sooner or later they will be fined.

Oh, and another:

Pass a cop with it that loud, he's sure to stop you. Then, I will refer back to the previous two issues.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
Galaxie's Avatar
I Have Admin Envy
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,740
Likes: 1
you will get plenty of noise violation tickets :cop2: :nono:

dyno tests have shown some engines actually LOSE power with no mufflers

Sounds fun for a while.. but the first 100mile trip you make with no mufflers will be your last.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #7  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
A 4banger SRT4 is way samller than a 281 ci ... 4.6 3v v8
Also it has RESONATORS which make a difference..its not open pipe from the manifold on that car.

Mufflers no, but resonators yes.

Don't fool yourself...
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #8  
StevenJ's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
What about louder mufflers? Like um...... Flowmasters for example? They tend to sound good. Something like that is legal right? I mean, I'd like to hear the car but I can understand the need to tone it down a bit. This is funny actually. I was riding with my aunt. She was driving her mom's 03' Malibu. I had my cousin, her son, on my lap, and my uncle was up front. We were bringing a tv over to my grandma's. On the way, we passed this guy that had a early 80's Nova with rust that obviously just had a Chevy big block crate motor dropped in it. It was loud. I mean, you could hear it comming from miles away. I loved the way it sounded but my aunt and uncle, who represent the average joes, found it way too loud and couldn't stand it. So I understand the need for a muffler. Just not quiet ones. I think a middle ground can be found.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #9  
FinlayZJ's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Galaxie@July 22, 2004, 2:08 PM
dyno tests have shown some engines actually LOSE power with no mufflers.
Very true. We did a pneumatic muffler design for my senior engineering project at Clemson in fall of 03. There is a ton of factors to consider when changing your muffler. Most engines need the back pressure to create the maximum hp numbers you will want. Just cutting off the muffler will make it loud, but more than likely, slower. The trick is to get the sound through, with the right amount of pressure. I'll pay the $$$ to get a real muffler to put some rumble under my 05.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #10  
dallasw77's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
There is a point where you have enough horsepower where mufflers will hamper peformance, no matter what type of muffler (hence that is why you see no mufflers in NASCAR/NHRA). But I don't say that because the pros don't run them, it is proven on dynos that higher horsepower engines get hampered by mufflers. Each engine is different and only tuning on a dyno will find you where that point is.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #11  
Purple Hayz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
I have a bad feeling about this :jedi:


Yikes, never even considered the noise violation aspect. You are right, it wouldn't even be worth it....Flomasters it is, then

Oh well, it was a fun (if completely unrealistic) idea...
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:32 PM
  #12  
dallasw77's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
hehe hey it's fun doing no mufflers in your garage or car show for my 68 camaro! 555 cubic inches sounds really good when it is not muffled up!!! Shoot even with my 4" flowmasters on there cops look at me like they want to pull me over!!! Just lucky I haven't found the uptight by the rules cop yet.......
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #13  
Arboc's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
with no mufflers it will sound like a burned out chevy 305

plus as mentioned u will loose backpressure and therefore power
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
MedVader's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Wrong. On the backpressure arguement.

Exhaust flow is the real determinant. People moving up to larger pipes tend to lose exhaust velocity and thus actually reducing flow and hp. Or they may reduce flow at low RPM and pick up flow at high RPM. Given identical pipes (which he'll have just cutting off the muffler) he will reduce backpressure(restriction) WITHOUT reducing exhaust velocity at any RPM. And he'll make more power.

Equal length and TRi-Y headers are good because they scavenge exhaust ie. increase exhaust velocity.

The reason an SRT-4 doesn't need a real muffler is that thingy called a turbo. It makes a great muffler too.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #15  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,000
Likes: 0
You crazy I seriously thought this post would be about going with an aftermarket set of mufflers which are less obvious........but removing the mufflers all together, man you must REALLY hate those things....and your ear drums.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 05:24 PM
  #16  
MR325iT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MedVader@July 22, 2004, 3:48 PM
Wrong. On the backpressure arguement.



MedVader is right on. The backpressure argument isn't entirely correct.

http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/html_product/...etorquemyth.htm
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #17  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Just get an O-Pipe and be done with it
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #18  
FinlayZJ's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MedVader@July 22, 2004, 3:48 PM
Wrong. On the backpressure arguement.
Ok, so you're going to tell me that a muffler doesn't create any friction loss? Given two identical 3" diameter equal length pipes, one with a muffler, one without, the exit velocity will be the same? Apparently the laws of physics fail to exist in the exhaust system of you car.

It takes pressure (a force) to move the exhaust through the pipes. The walls of the pipes create friction and how much exhaust (in CFM, cubic feet per minute) can be pushed through your pipes is a function of pipe diameter, material, length, gas density, and the amount of force it's getting pushed or pulled with. One can also consider the change in height from where it exits the block, to where it leaves the muffler. However, gases are so light that it's basically worthless. Gases are very particular about "minor" losses such as change in direction and objects that interfere with the laminar flow, such as A MUFFLER. I haven't seen the inside of the new stangs muffler, but it is usually numerous chamber and baffles, that force the gas to change direction a few times. This in turn creates friction, slowing down the speed of the air and reducing the EXIT VELOCITY. The reduced exit velocity makes the amount of gas trapped in the pipes increase, therefore creating the flow leaving the block to be slowed. This is what some call "back pressure." And for engines, larger diameter pipes usually shift the the max hp and torque numbers up the powerband.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:09 PM
  #19  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Originally posted by Purple Hayz@July 22, 2004, 3:29 PM
I have a bad feeling about this :jedi:


Yikes, never even considered the noise violation aspect. You are right, it wouldn't even be worth it....Flomasters it is, then

Oh well, it was a fun (if completely unrealistic) idea...
BASSANI
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #20  
JeffreyDJ's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 3,621
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, TX
Borla

But yeah, deleting would be a bad idea. Friend at work has them off his 98 Corbra. He claims to like it, but may just not want to put them back on (he bought it with it off). Sounds llike pooey though, IMO.

Yes, its loud, but the quality of tone and sound with a GOOD muffler will be much nicer.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 AM.