Impressions
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My thoughts, now that I've finally seen one in person (probably one of the last people here to see one in person ).
1. Definitely better looking in person.
2. Front end is really nice, can't say anything bad about it. Even the covers over the headlights did not bother me one bit. I think Ford hit it out of the park in that regard.
3. Noticed that unlike the pictures I have seen, the opening in the lower bumper (below the grill) was not entirely open -- it was four segments, the outer two were solid, the inside ones were open.
4. The mirrors do not look all that big from the front or side, but the actual size of the glass is *much* bigger than on an SN95. Kinda like them for that, they don't stick out but I bet you can see a lot more behind you.
5. The tail looks big in pictures, but looks perfectly sized in person.
6. The interior looks better in pictures than it does in person. I really did not like the chrome rings around the guages at all, way too shiny. (this '05 had the IUP, so there was all the aluminum as well)
7. Tires to not look bad to me from the side, even though they are a little taller. I did think they looked a bit narrow from the back, however.
8. Muffler cans weren't *that* noticable, but I'd still paint them black.
I did not get to sit inside, or see the engine, because there was no Ford guy there and the car was locked. I'm quite dissapointed, in fact, because I would have expected a better effort from Ford at a three day event hosting 1400 privately owned Mustangs. COME ON FORD, WE EXIST, AND WE HAVE A CRAPLOAD OF MUSTANGS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. At least SVT showed up, but all they were doing was selling apparel (got myself a nice SVT ballcap for $10, at least it was cheap...). They did have a 5.0L cammer motor on display -- doesn't really look any different from a 4.6L to me .
Someone can jump in and call BS on me, but I'm guessing that the Mustang I saw was a production line Mustang. It was torch red with a black cloth interior and the IUP, and had a VIN number starting with 1ZV ... (whatever, can't remember past that and I didn't bother taking a picture). And the serial was 100048, so that makes it what, 48th produced out of that batch of 120 they ran off a few weeks ago?
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
1. Definitely better looking in person.
2. Front end is really nice, can't say anything bad about it. Even the covers over the headlights did not bother me one bit. I think Ford hit it out of the park in that regard.
3. Noticed that unlike the pictures I have seen, the opening in the lower bumper (below the grill) was not entirely open -- it was four segments, the outer two were solid, the inside ones were open.
4. The mirrors do not look all that big from the front or side, but the actual size of the glass is *much* bigger than on an SN95. Kinda like them for that, they don't stick out but I bet you can see a lot more behind you.
5. The tail looks big in pictures, but looks perfectly sized in person.
6. The interior looks better in pictures than it does in person. I really did not like the chrome rings around the guages at all, way too shiny. (this '05 had the IUP, so there was all the aluminum as well)
7. Tires to not look bad to me from the side, even though they are a little taller. I did think they looked a bit narrow from the back, however.
8. Muffler cans weren't *that* noticable, but I'd still paint them black.
I did not get to sit inside, or see the engine, because there was no Ford guy there and the car was locked. I'm quite dissapointed, in fact, because I would have expected a better effort from Ford at a three day event hosting 1400 privately owned Mustangs. COME ON FORD, WE EXIST, AND WE HAVE A CRAPLOAD OF MUSTANGS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. At least SVT showed up, but all they were doing was selling apparel (got myself a nice SVT ballcap for $10, at least it was cheap...). They did have a 5.0L cammer motor on display -- doesn't really look any different from a 4.6L to me .
Someone can jump in and call BS on me, but I'm guessing that the Mustang I saw was a production line Mustang. It was torch red with a black cloth interior and the IUP, and had a VIN number starting with 1ZV ... (whatever, can't remember past that and I didn't bother taking a picture). And the serial was 100048, so that makes it what, 48th produced out of that batch of 120 they ran off a few weeks ago?
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
#2
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something else -- I've heard people ask about the shifter. This one was in either first or third gear, and there was a good four or five inches of clearance between the **** and the center stack. Not going to hit it with your knuckles, as some people have worried. I wish I could have sat inside and worked the shifter myself though, I'm curious as to how short the lever is and how much of it's apparently short length is just the console being raised. Not sure I'm happy about that, if Ford just raised the console, it'll be *harder* to get a short throw shifter to fit right.
Dave
Dave
#4
Good analisis! (Sorry bout da spelling!) I saw it last year at the auto show but it was up on a platform so I didn't get to see all or sit in it but the door was open and it was Redfire and I loved it. In fact, my whole family loved it. I say Ford did a "Grade A" job.
#6
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by HairyCanary@July 18, 2004, 6:11 PM
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
#7
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@July 18, 2004, 4:39 PM
I can vouch for the capabilities of the AAI plant. I have a 2004 Mazda 6 and the build quality is excellent.
I can vouch for the capabilities of the AAI plant. I have a 2004 Mazda 6 and the build quality is excellent.
#8
Originally posted by USA-Adam@July 18, 2004, 6:37 PM
You're not the last person to see one in person. I have yet to see one. Wisconsin is apparently too hick for Ford to bring a car here
You're not the last person to see one in person. I have yet to see one. Wisconsin is apparently too hick for Ford to bring a car here
#9
Originally posted by MustangMan311+July 18, 2004, 7:11 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MustangMan311 @ July 18, 2004, 7:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-USA-Adam@July 18, 2004, 6:37 PM
You're not the last person to see one in person. I have yet to see one. Wisconsin is apparently too hick for Ford to bring a car here
You're not the last person to see one in person. I have yet to see one. Wisconsin is apparently too hick for Ford to bring a car here
Chicago will have a show but I don't think I'll be able to view it because of my work schedule.
#11
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since there are so many pictures already available, I only took a couple of shots today. Here's what I got:
My favorite angle looking at this car:
Has this always been this way? I lightened the picture to show what I'm talking about -- the openings on the side are blocked. I thought the mules had them all open?
I took a picture of the top of the wing, I notice it has a slope down the top that I hadn't seen before. The leading edge of the wing is quite flat, also. Not that it's supposed to be aerodynamic, I know.
And the requisite butt shot. I personally thought it looked just fine from the back, the pictures make it look bigger. Don't actresses complain that TV does the same thing??
Also, forgot to mention earlier -- I did a quick & dirty measurement of wheel well gap. There was four fingers of width in front and back (front wheel), and four and a half fingers on top. I didn't find the gap particularly offensive, but I do think I would opt to drop it about a half inch or so.
Dave
My favorite angle looking at this car:
Has this always been this way? I lightened the picture to show what I'm talking about -- the openings on the side are blocked. I thought the mules had them all open?
I took a picture of the top of the wing, I notice it has a slope down the top that I hadn't seen before. The leading edge of the wing is quite flat, also. Not that it's supposed to be aerodynamic, I know.
And the requisite butt shot. I personally thought it looked just fine from the back, the pictures make it look bigger. Don't actresses complain that TV does the same thing??
Also, forgot to mention earlier -- I did a quick & dirty measurement of wheel well gap. There was four fingers of width in front and back (front wheel), and four and a half fingers on top. I didn't find the gap particularly offensive, but I do think I would opt to drop it about a half inch or so.
Dave
#14
Originally posted by FrankBullitt05@July 18, 2004, 8:25 PM
Where's the Chicago show? I'll bring my video camera this time...
The car you saw was probably another mule, might've been taken apart and put back together...
Where's the Chicago show? I'll bring my video camera this time...
The car you saw was probably another mule, might've been taken apart and put back together...
#16
OMG TORCH RED. This color grows on me more and more. The contrast up front with the black grille and the black insert in the lower valance is bloody awesome.
I think this is the color for me. (And I've never once owned anything but a black car!)
I think this is the color for me. (And I've never once owned anything but a black car!)
#17
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Location: The Nature Coast, Florida
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i finally seen the 05 in tampa over the weekend and yes it is soooo much better in person i wanted to add that i noticed something that i didnt know was talked about and thats the driver and passenger side windows automatically come down a bit when the door is opend i asked the reason for this and the ford guys said it was for making a better seal.... the window goes up when the door is closed.
#18
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by HairyCanary@July 18, 2004, 6:11 PM
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
Oh, and one thing I did notice -- build quality on this one was subpar, even by SN95 standards. Trunk lid fit almost perfectly, but the driver side door was noticably out of alignment towards the bottom, and the hood was noticably out of alignment on the passenger side. Not a good demonstration of the capability of the AAI plant.
Dave
I would suspect what you saw was not representative of what could be expected by the time production starts. As compared the DAP and the current body structure, I would bank on a high level of fit and finish. The plant tour convinced me that the probability of seeing much better builds is higher than ever.
#19
Originally posted by USA-Adam+July 18, 2004, 9:12 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (USA-Adam @ July 18, 2004, 9:12 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-FrankBullitt05@July 18, 2004, 8:25 PM
Where's the Chicago show? I'll bring my video camera this time...
The car you saw was probably another mule, might've been taken apart and put back together...
Where's the Chicago show? I'll bring my video camera this time...
The car you saw was probably another mule, might've been taken apart and put back together...
I think it will be at the Odeum in Villa Park, Il Aug. 7th, but you have to register with Ford, it's there test drive thing.