2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Decision to be made

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
theguy10's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: June 16, 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Ok there is a Mach 1 that is left in my area still and with x-plan and current rebates, it is down to less than $25k. What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #2  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
I'm going to sound dumb, but pick whichever one you want more.

I know that it is hard with out having an '05 to drive, see, touch, etc. while you have a Mach sitting right in front of you. Good decision either way you choose!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #3  
MustangMan311's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2004
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 2
I say neither! Wait a few years and save up the cash for a 2006 Mach 1 SE.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #4  
Galaxie's Avatar
I Have Admin Envy
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,740
Likes: 1
Wait until the '05 hit the lots..
in about 7-8 weeks there should be one in your local showroom to testdrive,

If you still want a mach1, you should be able to find one,

in my mind, the '05 is so much more refined you will be hooked.... don't jump too soon or you might have buyers remorse.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
BlackRiderX's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 1
I would say 05 just for the improvements.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
EleanorsMine's Avatar
After all these years,
My C/T still sucks!
 
Joined: May 5, 2004
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 0
From: Orlando(DP!) Florida
I feel your pain!

Theres an orange 04 Gt calling my name every day..
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #7  
mr-mstng's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 4
From: NE PA
I agree, since you are so close to seeing them on lots, I'd wait. I'm there will be some 04s left on lots as the 05s are arriving.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
Kluski's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 23, 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 9
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Tough choice! When I went to order my 05, I test drove an 04. Nice. I really enjoyed it. But then I thought there are so many improvements on the 05. It was really hard to leave without a new car.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #9  
Lalo's Avatar
I'm people, and I like.
 
Joined: March 13, 2004
Posts: 9,243
Likes: 0
From: PDX
if i had to choose between those two, i would buy the mach1 (it seems i'm the only one). it's a future collector car, and the shaker kicks ****
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #10  
mach1fever's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
If you want it you should be able to get it for 24
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #11  
Shelby Roadster's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally posted by thezeppelin8@July 30, 2004, 1:29 PM
if i had to choose between those two, i would buy the mach1 (it seems i'm the only one). it's a future collector car, and the shaker kicks ****
The Mach 1 won't be a collector car in the future. We aren't in the 60's again, and if you want a newer collectible mustang, the Cobra R's are the car in the Ford lineup that has a chance of ever appreciating in value.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:08 PM
  #12  
mach1fever's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
shelby I beg to differ..... There were four times the mach 1's made in the sixties. I garuntee they will be collectors cars in 30 years.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #13  
Amy V6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 3, 2004
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Wait

White looks gross too haha
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #14  
Shelby Roadster's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally posted by mach1fever@July 30, 2004, 2:11 PM
shelby I beg to differ..... There were four times the mach 1's made in the sixties. I garuntee they will be collectors cars in 30 years.
Sorry for the off-topic conversation here.

Define collector car.

You can't compare a 428CJ Mach 1 with the Mach 1's of today. No comparison. Plus, if you think someone is going to pay over MSRP for a mach 1 as a collector car in 30 years, you are grossly mistaken.

The cars of the 1960's are collectible for a variety of reasons, most notibly, nobody was collecting back then and people just drove the cars, and everyone and their brother collects now.

Cars are terrible investments these days, and I don't care if it's a Mach 1 or Bullitt, these cars will never sell above their sticker price in the future like the cars of the 50's and 60's do. They hold may well depreciate at a slower rate, and sell for a tad more than other cars, but collectible or valuable, they will be not.

It all boils down on how you define collectible, but if you view collectible as increasing in value over what you have in the car, don't hold your breath.

Don't take offense to this, as it's not meant as an angry post, but you have to be realistic about the expectations of the car market in the future.

To answer the original posters question, wait for the 2005, as their will still be Mach 1's around, and their prices will drop like rocks once the 2005's hit the lots.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #15  
MedVader's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Judging by that pathetic run by the '05 in the video, I'd say get the Mach1
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #16  
t69r00p69's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Who's to say if a car will become a collectible 40 years from now? I personaly think it will have a lot more value than your average GT's, but hey that's just me. The Mach I's are very sweet but I agree w/ Amy that I don't like the white too much. If you're really that torn apart you can always wait to test drive one.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #17  
t69r00p69's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MedVader@July 30, 2004, 3:31 PM
Judging by that pathetic run by the '05 in the video, I'd say get the Mach1
What video?

Edit: nevermind just saw the video Get the Mach I or wait for another SE :angry:
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #18  
svtdriver's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Shelby Roadster+July 30, 2004, 3:00 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Shelby Roadster @ July 30, 2004, 3:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-mach1fever@July 30, 2004, 2:11 PM
shelby I beg to differ..... There were four times the mach 1's made in the sixties. I garuntee they will be collectors cars in 30 years.
Sorry for the off-topic conversation here.

Define collector car.

You can't compare a 428CJ Mach 1 with the Mach 1's of today. No comparison. Plus, if you think someone is going to pay over MSRP for a mach 1 as a collector car in 30 years, you are grossly mistaken.

The cars of the 1960's are collectible for a variety of reasons, most notibly, nobody was collecting back then and people just drove the cars, and everyone and their brother collects now.

Cars are terrible investments these days, and I don't care if it's a Mach 1 or Bullitt, these cars will never sell above their sticker price in the future like the cars of the 50's and 60's do. They hold may well depreciate at a slower rate, and sell for a tad more than other cars, but collectible or valuable, they will be not.

It all boils down on how you define collectible, but if you view collectible as increasing in value over what you have in the car, don't hold your breath.

Don't take offense to this, as it's not meant as an angry post, but you have to be realistic about the expectations of the car market in the future.

To answer the original posters question, wait for the 2005, as their will still be Mach 1's around, and their prices will drop like rocks once the 2005's hit the lots. [/b][/quote]
I guess I would also have to disagree to some extent. Let's look at a 1965 convertible gt. Right now they go for significantly more than MSRP (Assuming it is in good shape and was kept low miles by someone wanting to collect it). There was even a story on the internet a while back. It was about a fastback that had been so throughly restored. That they turned down an offer of something like
$75k for it. The other thing is. From what I have seen. Many a fool trys to collect a car from the current era (See ZR-1 from more info). The reality is unless you have something extremely rare. There is no point in storing it for 30 to 40 years. Unless you have the ability to store it on your own property. It will cost you more to store than it is likely going to be worth

As far as which car to get. I say get the mach 1. But mostly because I want an 05. And since they will be allocating them in the beginning. The more people I can convince not to get one. The better my chance are.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #19  
BlackRiderX's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 1
I would never buy a car with hopes that it is worth money some day. Buy it and enjoy driving it!

There is a big difference between the Shelbys of yesterday and the cars today. Many cars today that are being bought, having fluids drained out, and are then put into storage to be sold in twenty years. I don't think a Mach 1 is going to be rare, or even worth very much down the road. The only car that I can think of that was made in the last twenty or so years that has a chance to hold it's value or be sold at a profit is probably the Gen 2 Viper. Prices on low mile Vipers seemed to have stablized in the 50s for now.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #20  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
not a question for me. I vote O5 (not redfire though)


I'm so stuck on the new design I spend everyday on this friggin' forum. lol

I do love the mach1 but I don't want to buy a new car with an old body style.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.