2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Cost of Lateral Stability -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #21  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet+December 16, 2004, 10:48 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Roger Ramjet @ December 16, 2004, 10:48 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Giddyup@December 16, 2004, 12:21 PM
....But I bet your Corvette is a rattle-trap compared to the Mustang.
Spoken like someone with no C5 expereience. I've had 2 of 'em - both tight and rattle free. [/b][/quote]
No doubt about it vetts are nice. But comparing suspension between the 2 cars is like apples and oranges. $25- 30k for a mustang gt and 45 to 55k for a new vette.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #22  
38special's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2004
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
With stock tires I had some scary lane changes at 100mph.

Not anymore with a wider, 255/50/r17 wheel at all 4 corners.

The only distraction at 110 mph the other day, was the sweet sound of my motor humming its sweet tunes. :worship:
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #23  
jcopin's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 26, 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet@December 16, 2004, 6:53 AM
Yeah, it is a sports car but the ride is harsher than my Corvette Z06!
im sure if u pumped another 30k into a mustang GT to make it cost the same as you Z06 it would absolutely dominate it in every possible way
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #24  
jcopin's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 26, 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 38special@December 16, 2004, 11:15 AM
With stock tires I had some scary lane changes at 100mph.

Not anymore with a wider, 255/50/r17 wheel at all 4 corners.

The only distraction at 110 mph the other day, was the sweet sound of my motor humming its sweet tunes. :worship:
oh so your the guy responsible for my insurance premiums
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #25  
Mellow Yellow's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Originally posted by jcopin@December 16, 2004, 11:16 AM
oh so your the guy responsible for my insurance premiums
No, that would be you.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #26  
jcopin's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 26, 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Mellow Yellow+December 16, 2004, 11:24 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mellow Yellow @ December 16, 2004, 11:24 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jcopin@December 16, 2004, 11:16 AM
oh so your the guy responsible for my insurance premiums
No, that would be you. [/b][/quote]
naa

guys like that which overall makes males insurance much higher than females
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #27  
Giddyup's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet+December 16, 2004, 8:48 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Roger Ramjet @ December 16, 2004, 8:48 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Giddyup@December 16, 2004, 12:21 PM
....But I bet your Corvette is a rattle-trap compared to the Mustang.
Spoken like someone with no C5 expereience. I've had 2 of 'em - both tight and rattle free. [/b][/quote]
Well, actually I have never owned a C5, but I have driven 2 of them.......not long drives, but driven nonetheless..... I thought these 2 rattled/squeeked noticbly. I am axious to see the new C6 however, since it is supposed to be shorter/smaller. I think for a 2-seater, the Corvette just got a little too big for my liking over the last several years.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:04 AM
  #28  
ZRX4ME's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
i've had a 2003 mach 1,and 2 2001 GT's and all those cars would loosen my fillings when I hit a bump,dip or pothole.MY 2005 GT is so much better at dealing wih road irregularities that its not even a close comparison.JMO
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #29  
66Satellite's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet@December 16, 2004, 5:57 AM
The new GT does turn much better than the old body styles. It doesn't do the roll and wallow thing anymore. But, it appears that the cost of this better turning performance is a harsher ride from stiffer springs. I would classify it as VERY STIFF - a lot of quick vertical movement. My SUV rides smoother than my new GT.
A "real" SUV would have a fairly harsh ride, too. These soccer mom SUVs are tuned for a comfy ride over speed bumps at the mall.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:37 AM
  #30  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
When I test drove the 05 I didn't notice it being that bad. Maybe because I was to excited to be in the driver's seat. I'm guessing my new stang probably won't ride as nice as my f150. That thing rides like a luxury car. Ford really got the f150 right this time It's simply the best truck ever (well besides the new super duty).

Some how I don't think I'll care to much about the ride. I am going to be having to much fun cruising around on a hot sunny day!
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #31  
os121's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
I for one like the handling of the new 05 very much. It exceeds every expectation that I had for it. Roger - did you buy the 05 ? I am curious because it seems that you are not very happy with one of the more important aspects of it.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #32  
Stubbies's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet@December 16, 2004, 5:53 AM
Yeah, it is a sports car but the ride is harsher than my Corvette Z06!
I don't doubt that it is, but Chevy has an extra 30k of your dollars to make it that way. If the Stang was priced the same, then it'd be a good comparison, but as it stands, I'll take the harsher than Z06 ride and bank the 30k.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #33  
Giddyup's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Stubbies@December 16, 2004, 3:58 PM
If the Stang was priced the same, then it'd be a good comparison, but as it stands, I'll take the harsher than Z06 ride and bank the 30k.
Yeah, and in other words...."Bang For The Buck".
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #34  
Retro GT's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 15, 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Roger Ramjet@December 16, 2004, 5:57 AM
The new GT does turn much better than the old body styles. It doesn't do the roll and wallow thing anymore. But, it appears that the cost of this better turning performance is a harsher ride from stiffer springs. I would classify it as VERY STIFF - a lot of quick vertical movement. My SUV rides smoother than my new GT.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 05:35 PM
  #35  
captin kapla's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Originally posted by PONY XPRESS@December 16, 2004, 8:05 AM
Interesting you feel the ride is too stiff, but the steering is too light.

My wife has a S type 4.2 Jag. Similar chassis to the Stang. I find it to be a little too soft & not enough feel through the steering wheel.

But we just did a trip that takes about 7 hours, & it only took 6 in the Jag. Great highway car.
off topic but

the next Jaguar S-Type will likely use the aluminum chassis of the new Jaguar XJ (as will the 2006 XK)....
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #36  
bigred0383's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Mellow Yellow+December 16, 2004, 11:24 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mellow Yellow @ December 16, 2004, 11:24 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jcopin@December 16, 2004, 11:16 AM
oh so your the guy responsible for my insurance premiums
No, that would be you. [/b][/quote]
Don't even get me started on insurance. Sometimes I think I should just get hitched for the discount.

But seriously, would you rather have a soft mushy supsension? People drive Mustangs for the sporty feel, if they want to drive a car that glides on air, then can get one. For the price, I think that the 05 Mustang not only handles better but has a nicer overall ride than the outgoing model. Granted I don't have the pleasure of driving one everyday, but my test drives have assured me that they did just about as good as humanly possible with the live-axle.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #37  
upstate's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
I like my Mustang just fine thank you. Have owned 3 Vettes and rode in my friends 05 Vette. They are nice cars too. Friendly drivers as they are always waving!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #38  
MustangDan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2004
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
If you want a better ride put the v6 wheels on I'm sure someone would trade.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
Aug 25, 2021 11:12 AM
CNFLCTD
GT350
4
Aug 4, 2017 07:08 AM
Infamous_blackbeard
Introductions
5
Oct 8, 2015 10:45 PM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 28, 2015 05:20 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 AM.