2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

05 GT almost a second faster than 04 GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/19/04, 11:02 AM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
joeuser42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guy on stangnet said he talked to a designer and was told "the 05's are going to be close to a second faster than the current GT's hopefully".

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=493996
Old 8/19/04, 11:09 AM
  #2  
Cobra Member
 
Dr Iven's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great news, but I'll take it with a grain of salt. I also liked the statement that the Cobra will have well over 400 hp.

And born4spd should just buy himself a Prius in a few years.
Old 8/19/04, 11:10 AM
  #3  
FR500 Member
 
RaGsHoCkEy88's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2004
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that 14 year old kid is dumb
Old 8/19/04, 11:29 AM
  #4  
Retired Tms Staff
 
adrenalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I haven't looked but what is the hp of the 2004 mustang? I would have expected the 2005 to be faster than the 2004.
Old 8/19/04, 11:31 AM
  #5  
Retired Tms Staff
 
adrenalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I just read that stangnet link. What an idiot. I do agree with one guy on that page when he says "Suggestion for forum rule: You are not allowed to post unless you are old enough to drive."
Old 8/19/04, 11:39 AM
  #6  
GT Member
 
PaperTarget's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 second faster would be about Mach1 fast compared to a stock 2004 Mustang GT or pretty close to it.
Old 8/19/04, 12:04 PM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
joeuser42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 14-year old (Born4speed) is the kid who said "oh yea well i talked someone who works at ford he said it is crap , it isn't as aerodynamic as the 99+ one", not the guy (streetstang03) who said he talked to a designer.
Old 8/19/04, 12:11 PM
  #8  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally posted by joeuser42@August 19, 2004, 12:07 PM
The 14-year old (Born4speed) is the kid who said "oh yea well i talked someone who works at ford he said it is crap , it isn't as aerodynamic as the 99+ one", not the guy (streetstang03) who said he talked to a designer.
That's who they're talking about not the guy that started the thread.
Old 8/19/04, 12:34 PM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
 
USA-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LMAO @ Born4spd .. what a freaking troll.
Old 8/19/04, 12:44 PM
  #10  
Cobra Member
 
charles's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why is a 14 yr old talking to ford designers
Old 8/19/04, 12:54 PM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
 
t69r00p69's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"close" to a second faster is "close" to 12's which would be low 13's...hmmmm a little skeptic, but that would rule all :drive: :headbang:
Old 8/19/04, 01:29 PM
  #12  
Cobra Member
 
Dr Iven's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I'm a little skeptical, as well... that's a HUGE difference! Even .5 is a big jump.
Old 8/19/04, 01:50 PM
  #13  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Kluski's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Questions/Answers

This same topic was discussed on one of TMS threads. A guy talked with some Ford guys and they stated the same. See the second page (about 1/3 down)
Old 8/19/04, 02:51 PM
  #14  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
I'm no drag racing expert but I think the rule of thumb is that for every increase of 100HP or decrease of 100LBS of weight equals 1 sec improvement in the 1/4 mile. That being the case and we're seeing an official bump of 40HP over the 2004 GT and the weight virtually the same, I'd expect to see around a .4 sec improvement, maybe a .5 at best. If it's truly close to a full second improvement, then the 300HP is grossly underrated.
Old 8/19/04, 03:26 PM
  #15  
Bullitt Member
 
428CJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 10, 2004
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dr Iven@August 19, 2004, 12:12 PM
Great news, but I'll take it with a grain of salt. I also liked the statement that the Cobra will have well over 400 hp.

And born4spd should just buy himself a Prius in a few years.
That would be similar to GM anouncing the next generation Z06 will have over 400HP.

Tell us somethin' we don't know... B)
Old 8/19/04, 04:22 PM
  #16  
Cobra R Member
 
MilStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually the chief designer, Larry Erickson, told me the same thing. See the 05 stang in San Antonio thread.

He stated to me and a few others at least 3 times that the new GT would be a second faster than the previous edition.

Actually I believe that guy was standing next to me at one point. I heard Mr. Erickson mention that the Cobra would be will over 400 as well. He stated that after the last Cobra they had to keep it up there and they were wanting to improve it drastically. Again, he mentioned them going after the ZO6 with the Cobra.
Old 8/19/04, 05:38 PM
  #17  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by MilStang@August 19, 2004, 4:25 PM
Again, he mentioned them going after the ZO6 with the Cobra.
They better work on the car's weight this time if they plan on that!
Old 8/19/04, 05:50 PM
  #18  
Member
 
MissMy67GT350's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carbon Fiber instead of the old Shelby fiberglass will take off some weight.
Old 8/19/04, 06:00 PM
  #19  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by MissMy67GT350@August 19, 2004, 5:53 PM
Carbon Fiber instead of the old Shelby fiberglass will take off some weight.
The 04 Lemans editon Z06 had a Carbon Fiber Hood which GM claimed added 4K to the price of the vehicle while saving only ten pounds. Carbon Fiber is still too expensive to use on the entire car. It would also limit production.

I have no doubt that Ford can stuff a 500 HP engine in the car but they have to get the car around 3100lbs and the price has to stay lower than the Z06 or it won't be much competition.
Old 8/19/04, 06:47 PM
  #20  
Bullitt Member
 
69Mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 4, 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think everythinng that kid said is all crap. i hope it is that fast but only time will tell.


Quick Reply: 05 GT almost a second faster than 04 GT?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.