Hey!
Hey!
Ok guys i just found two engines i could get some sweet deals on. I can a new 5.0 engine and drop that in my 02 GT (tranny and everything else i need) for about $6,500. Or i can a 351 engine and the new tremec 6 speed for about $8,000 (supporting parts included) what would yall say? I know its gonna be a pain in the *** to drop em in but ive been wantin to do this for a while.
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
The new 5.0(OHC), or a new 5.0(OHV)?
If the questions is about the new OHC 5.0 then I say go with that in a heart beat. The computer you have obviously won't work with it, but the motor mounts are the same as the 4.6 IIRC. That in itself takes a load of the work out, because at least then you can kind of have a starting place. Not to mention the power and torque of the new motor, plus the efficiency of variable valve timing. It's a win win.
If the question is 302 or 351, I'm not really sure what to say, because I can't imagine a reason you'd want to go back to stone age tech like that.
If the questions is about the new OHC 5.0 then I say go with that in a heart beat. The computer you have obviously won't work with it, but the motor mounts are the same as the 4.6 IIRC. That in itself takes a load of the work out, because at least then you can kind of have a starting place. Not to mention the power and torque of the new motor, plus the efficiency of variable valve timing. It's a win win.
If the question is 302 or 351, I'm not really sure what to say, because I can't imagine a reason you'd want to go back to stone age tech like that.
Originally Posted by cntchds
The new 5.0(OHC), or a new 5.0(OHV)?
If the questions is about the new OHC 5.0 then I say go with that in a heart beat. The computer you have obviously won't work with it, but the motor mounts are the same as the 4.6 IIRC. That in itself takes a load of the work out, because at least then you can kind of have a starting place. Not to mention the power and torque of the new motor, plus the efficiency of variable valve timing. It's a win win.
If the question is 302 or 351, I'm not really sure what to say, because I can't imagine a reason you'd want to go back to stone age tech like that.
If the questions is about the new OHC 5.0 then I say go with that in a heart beat. The computer you have obviously won't work with it, but the motor mounts are the same as the 4.6 IIRC. That in itself takes a load of the work out, because at least then you can kind of have a starting place. Not to mention the power and torque of the new motor, plus the efficiency of variable valve timing. It's a win win.
If the question is 302 or 351, I'm not really sure what to say, because I can't imagine a reason you'd want to go back to stone age tech like that.
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
There is no doubt that the 351 will put down good numbers, but I can't imagine the power would outweigh the weight savings of an all aluminum motor. If your car was a 94-95 I would probably have a different thought, but I just don't see a point in transplanting an older motor.
Originally Posted by cntchds
There is no doubt that the 351 will put down good numbers, but I can't imagine the power would outweigh the weight savings of an all aluminum motor. If your car was a 94-95 I would probably have a different thought, but I just don't see a point in transplanting an older motor.
That's an incredible deal for the new 5.0 and trans. There's no way I would pass that up. Going to need the new ECU and probably will have to get headers made and replace the K-member and some of the fuel system but if you can get the engine and trans for under 7K, you should go for it.
Originally Posted by Miserable
That's an incredible deal for the new 5.0 and trans. There's no way I would pass that up. Going to need the new ECU and probably will have to get headers made and replace the K-member and some of the fuel system but if you can get the engine and trans for under 7K, you should go for it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PonyMuscletang13
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Sep 29, 2015 09:40 AM




