1969 to 1970
#1
What advice can anyone give a first time buyer of a 69 or 70 mustang? Not a boss or mach just a regular V8. Certain things to look for, rust, consistent damage on these cars, engine problems at high miles? Any comments at all would be great.
#2
Rust is your worst enemy. Pour water in the cowl vent and see what comes out on the floorboards...cowl rust is troublesome and expensive to repair. Frame-rail rust is a no-no as well, unless the car is unusually rare. Floorboards are pretty commonly repaired, as are 1/4 panel patches and the like. Look at the radiator support for evidence of crash damage (wavy or repaired).
I know of no particular engine issues to be aware of otherwise.
________
Web Shows
I know of no particular engine issues to be aware of otherwise.
________
Web Shows
Last edited by LMan; 8/20/11 at 07:53 AM.
#3
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
#4
GTR Member
Originally posted by Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 8:24 AM
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
#5
Originally posted by mr-mstng+July 19, 2004, 8:29 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mr-mstng @ July 19, 2004, 8:29 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 8:24 AM
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
That really isn't the case. 65-66 cars are much more plentiful, and everything from major panels to trim is generally cheaper for the earlier cars.
#6
GTR Member
Originally posted by red302pony@July 18, 2004, 11:57 PM
What advice can anyone give a first time buyer of a 69 or 70 mustang? Not a boss or mach just a regular V8. Certain things to look for, rust, consistent damage on these cars, engine problems at high miles? Any comments at all would be great.
What advice can anyone give a first time buyer of a 69 or 70 mustang? Not a boss or mach just a regular V8. Certain things to look for, rust, consistent damage on these cars, engine problems at high miles? Any comments at all would be great.
#7
GTR Member
Originally posted by BLAKE@July 19, 2004, 8:32 AM
That really isn't the case. 65-66 cars are much more plentiful, and everything from major panels to trim is generally cheaper for the earlier cars.
That really isn't the case. 65-66 cars are much more plentiful, and everything from major panels to trim is generally cheaper for the earlier cars.
#8
How about a few examples:
66 Pony seat upholstery: $82.50 for one seat
69 Mach1 seat upholstery: $124.95 for one seat
66 Dashpad: $154.95
70 Dashpad: $469.00
66 Pony Door Panels: $129.95
70 Deluxe Door Panels: $349.95
66 Carpet: $104.95
69 Mach1 Carpet: $159.95
All prices from current NPD catalog. This also does not account for the many parts that are not even available for the 69-70 in reproduction. It is a widely known fact that the 65-66 is the easiest/cheapest to restore.
66 Pony seat upholstery: $82.50 for one seat
69 Mach1 seat upholstery: $124.95 for one seat
66 Dashpad: $154.95
70 Dashpad: $469.00
66 Pony Door Panels: $129.95
70 Deluxe Door Panels: $349.95
66 Carpet: $104.95
69 Mach1 Carpet: $159.95
All prices from current NPD catalog. This also does not account for the many parts that are not even available for the 69-70 in reproduction. It is a widely known fact that the 65-66 is the easiest/cheapest to restore.
#9
Originally posted by Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 7:24 AM
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
#10
Originally posted by red302pony@July 18, 2004, 10:57 PM
What advice can anyone give a first time buyer of a 69 or 70 mustang? Not a boss or mach just a regular V8. Certain things to look for, rust, consistent damage on these cars, engine problems at high miles? Any comments at all would be great.
What advice can anyone give a first time buyer of a 69 or 70 mustang? Not a boss or mach just a regular V8. Certain things to look for, rust, consistent damage on these cars, engine problems at high miles? Any comments at all would be great.
More of the work you can do yourself, the more you will save. Some parts are more expensive (dash pads) but there are alternatives that look good as well (molded dash covers).
If you have a desire to do it, do it. Don't listen to these pessimists.
#11
Originally posted by mr-mstng+July 19, 2004, 8:42 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mr-mstng @ July 19, 2004, 8:42 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-BLAKE@July 19, 2004, 8:32 AM
That really isn't the case. 65-66 cars are much more plentiful, and everything from major panels to trim is generally cheaper for the earlier cars.
That really isn't the case. 65-66 cars are much more plentiful, and everything from major panels to trim is generally cheaper for the earlier cars.
Dude, seriously. You need to go ahead and concede this point. It does in fact, cost "substantially" more to restore a 69-70 than a 65-66 in comparable shape. That's just the way it is.
That doesn't mean that they aren't worth it, but that is indeed the case.
#12
Originally posted by Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 7:24 AM
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
LONG LIVE MODIFIED!!
#14
Originally posted by CantedValve+July 19, 2004, 9:47 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (CantedValve @ July 19, 2004, 9:47 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 7:24 AM
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
Also be aware that is MUCH more costly to restore a 69-70 than it is an earlier Mustang. Aftermarket and reproduction parts are not as plentiful, and the price reflects that. If I were in the market for a 69-70, I would try to buy one that was finished. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can "fix it up" for less. You can't. Not a 69-70.
LONG LIVE MODIFIED!! [/b][/quote]
Did you know that your use of an apostrophe in '****'s' (sic) is incorrect, and that this word should be capitalized (proper noun)?
________
Roll a joint
Last edited by LMan; 8/20/11 at 07:54 AM.
#15
Actually, with the ****'s that are MCA changing the rules to disallow reproduction parts, there is little point in restoring a concours car anymore
LONG LIVE DQC!
#16
GTR Member
Originally posted by BLAKE@July 19, 2004, 10:01 AM
Dude, seriously. You need to go ahead and concede this point. It does in fact, cost "substantially" more to restore a 69-70 than a 65-66 in comparable shape. That's just the way it is.
That doesn't mean that they aren't worth it, but that is indeed the case.
Dude, seriously. You need to go ahead and concede this point. It does in fact, cost "substantially" more to restore a 69-70 than a 65-66 in comparable shape. That's just the way it is.
That doesn't mean that they aren't worth it, but that is indeed the case.
Prices from NPD.
Front Bumper 65-66 $84.95
Front Bumper 69-70 $89.95
Rear Bumper 65-66 $89.95
Rear Bumper 69-70 $89.95
Quarter Panel 65-66 $59.95
Quarter Panel 69-70 $79.95
I'll say this and then I'm through. I said that that it doesn't cost substantially more. When you figure the thousands of dollars spent on a restoration, the difference is minimal when looking at the big picture.
That being said, I leave you guys and your 'click' to yourselves.
#17
Originally posted by mr-mstng+July 19, 2004, 11:58 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mr-mstng @ July 19, 2004, 11:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-BLAKE@July 19, 2004, 10:01 AM
Dude, seriously. You need to go ahead and concede this point. It does in fact, cost "substantially" more to restore a 69-70 than a 65-66 in comparable shape. That's just the way it is.
That doesn't mean that they aren't worth it, but that is indeed the case.
Dude, seriously. You need to go ahead and concede this point. It does in fact, cost "substantially" more to restore a 69-70 than a 65-66 in comparable shape. That's just the way it is.
That doesn't mean that they aren't worth it, but that is indeed the case.
Prices from NPD.
Front Bumper 65-66 $84.95
Front Bumper 69-70 $89.95
Rear Bumper 65-66 $89.95
Rear Bumper 69-70 $89.95
Quarter Panel 65-66 $59.95
Quarter Panel 69-70 $79.95
I'll say this and then I'm through. I said that that it doesn't cost substantially more. When you figure the thousands of dollars spent on a restoration, the difference is minimal when looking at the big picture.
That being said, I leave you guys and your 'click' to yourselves. [/b][/quote]
There's nothing "click" about it. These are experienced people who know what they are talking about. There is alot the NPD isn't going to tell you.
I'm not beating this dead horse because I need to be right, or like to argue. I just don't want anyone who is about to get eye-***** deep in a project like this to be mislead into thinking something that is simply not true. No, it doesn't cost double what it would to restore a different years, but the difference can be thousands of dollars, and I would call that substantial.
#19
Come on guys. Let's go. We don't talk to his kind anyway. We're too good for that. :stubborn:
Sorry, just got a kick out of the "click" reference. It's actually clique, but we don't need to argue that.
Sorry, just got a kick out of the "click" reference. It's actually clique, but we don't need to argue that.
#20
Originally posted by Mberglo@July 19, 2004, 12:13 PM
Come on guys. Let's go. We don't talk to his kind anyway. We're too good for that. :stubborn:
Sorry, just got a kick out of the "click" reference. It's actually clique, but we don't need to argue that.
Come on guys. Let's go. We don't talk to his kind anyway. We're too good for that. :stubborn:
Sorry, just got a kick out of the "click" reference. It's actually clique, but we don't need to argue that.