2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Did Ford Motor Company Mess Up the New Mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/2/14, 04:45 AM
  #1  
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Did Ford Motor Company Mess Up the New Mustang?

http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...mentsBoxAnchor
Old 9/2/14, 07:01 AM
  #2  
GTR Member
 
Twin Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Location: England
Posts: 5,553
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Wink

No, they didn't.

/endthread
Old 9/2/14, 07:07 AM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
Mrsuitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 13, 2013
Location: Burlington
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
No, they didn't.

/endthread
This.
Old 9/2/14, 07:29 AM
  #4  
GT Member
 
ScottsGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2014
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comments were fun to read! Article itself sounded like it was written by someone at GM. It was a hit piece.
Old 9/2/14, 07:43 AM
  #5  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They certainly didn't "mess it up," however, I think they were just a touch too conservative with the styling -- should have gone a bit more EVOS -- and should have been trimmed and lightened even a modest amount (100lbs lighter), both for performance and efficiency reasons. Heck, Ford was able to trim, what 500-700lbs off the F150, 100 lbs off the Stang ought not to have been undoable.

I suspect the 2017-18 refresh will be a more modern interpretation, even beyond just maintaining stylistic pace, especially if it does well globally.
Old 9/2/14, 09:25 AM
  #6  
Mach 1 Member
 
Automatic 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2013
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I guess the point of the article was to bring an issue to the front that people have been complaining about for years now and while Ford had the car under the drawing board, they failed to address the issue.
Old 9/2/14, 11:25 AM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
 
Critical Mass's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2014
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rhumb
They certainly didn't "mess it up," however, I think they were just a touch too conservative with the styling -- should have gone a bit more EVOS -- and should have been trimmed and lightened even a modest amount (100lbs lighter), both for performance and efficiency reasons. Heck, Ford was able to trim, what 500-700lbs off the F150, 100 lbs off the Stang ought not to have been undoable.

I suspect the 2017-18 refresh will be a more modern interpretation, even beyond just maintaining stylistic pace, especially if it does well globally.
By making the entire body aluminum. That's how they lightened it. But make no mistake. if it works out, once they have perfected it. All their cars will go aluminum bodied. The sheet metal is already so thin on the new cars, they might as well go to aluminum if they can learn how to paint them properly.
Old 9/2/14, 11:46 AM
  #8  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"Why was ford reluctant to make big changes", isn't the entire 2015 completely new!? They have to keep some of the original styling like the front end and rear lights so people know it's a mustang.
Old 9/2/14, 11:47 AM
  #9  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couldn't do the mustang in aluminum because of cost. Easier to spread the tooling costs and increased build costs over close to a million F150's they sell every year compared to the 80,000 mustangs.
Most people complaining about the styling seem to be mad it doesn't look like a 60's.
Old 9/2/14, 12:14 PM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
[COLOR="blue"FORD[/COLOR] did a fine job as always with the new car.
People are only passionate about the things they love.
FORD is certainly pleased with all the rethoric, the Mustang will always be on-top.
Old 9/2/14, 12:25 PM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
 
bryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
No, they didn't.

/endthread
+2

Old 9/2/14, 12:28 PM
  #12  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
CiniZter's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
^^+1
Old 9/4/14, 08:35 PM
  #13  
Member
 
ixamnis's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Location: Central Kansas
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't be too dismissive of the article. For me, I think that Ford has generally done a good job with the Mustang. The fully independent suspension is certainly a plus. I like the addition of the ecoboost engine; although I'd love to see a more powerful ecoboost: (convert the 3.7 V6 to an ecoboost with 400+ hp?)

Mostly, the car retains a lot of its "Mustangness." The character lines on the side, the taillights and the roofline all shout "Mustang!"

I think the front end of the car is a little bit of a miss. I don't hate it, but I don't love it, either. I think the grill takes away some of the Mustangness of the car. I also don't like that the GT doesn't come with big foglights in the grille to distinguish it from other models. The whole shape of the headlights and the way they interact with the front of the car seems wrong to me. It's not ugly. It's modern. It's corporate. But it's not Mustang-y.

Overall, I think the car is a step in the right direction. Ford needed to move away from the Retro-stang look of the 2005 -2012 models. The 2013/14 moves away from retro very slightly, and the 2015 moves a little farther away from retro and into modern. But, still .... that grille.

Perhaps the front end of the car will grow on me. I'm anxious to get in one and take it for a test drive. I'm sure I'll love the car, overall. I certainly don't think Ford "messed up" the Mustang. However, I do agree with the article that the new Mustang is more evolution than revolution. I think its the car that the public wants, and I think it will sell in big numbers.

Still..... that grille.....
Old 9/4/14, 08:50 PM
  #14  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
The power of suggestion


Seems like a hit piece


Maybe a disgruntled member here
Old 9/4/14, 08:52 PM
  #15  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by conv_stang
Couldn't do the mustang in aluminum because of cost. Easier to spread the tooling costs and increased build costs over close to a million F150's they sell every year compared to the 80,000 mustangs.
Most people complaining about the styling seem to be mad it doesn't look like a 60's.

This, if Ford sold 200 plus thousand Mustangs a year they could have done it.


Although they could have certainly taken the same tack as Toyota with the FR-S and the New Miata which is said to be 200 pounds lighter and just capped power at 300 or so horsepower.


The Miata is coming with 155 horsepower in the new model I believe so they could take some serious weight out of the car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
ssjbuu
Repair and Service Help
6
8/28/15 08:55 AM
retiredf5
Ecoboost
0
7/21/15 05:54 PM
Detroit Steel
'10-14 Roush Mustangs
0
7/13/15 01:04 PM
aphaynes
Rocket City Mustang Club
0
7/9/15 09:25 AM



Quick Reply: Did Ford Motor Company Mess Up the New Mustang?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 PM.