'10-14 Shelby Mustangs

Dyno Run after 2.6 Pulley and WMS Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
bpmurr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
Dyno Run after 2.6 Pulley and WMS Tune

In my previous dyno post JJ at Woodbine Motorsports ran some baseline numbers on my car.

First run with the stock Ford tune
460RWHP/415RWTRQ
77.61F
24% Humidity

Second run with the Evo "Lund" Tune
473RWHP/449RWTQ
80.21F
26% Humidity
*far from the 510RWHP/480RWHP Evo advertises on their 2010 GT500 -

JJ installed a stock lock VMP 2.65 pulley, Metco Idler, Afco Dual Fan Heat Exchanger, and VMP stock look coolant tank. Unfortunately the VMP pulley wasn't balanced right and would wobble. I had to get a Metco 2.6 overnighted from Lethal Performance. (Big Props to them for the quick turn around) JJ street tuned the car today. I took it over to Adrenaline Automotive to get some dyno numbers since JJ doesn't have one yet. It was a 30 minute drive to the shop and the car sat for 20 minutes before the first pulls and only 10 minutes for the third pull. (Which was the best) Below is a video of the best run.

513RWP/500RWTRQ
70.65F
6% Humidity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTxWH8axmFA


Last edited by bpmurr; Apr 9, 2010 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #2  
TTS197's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Do you have chart SAE corrected? what kind of octane where you using?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #3  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
That torque curve is flatter a mechanics ruler.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #4  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by eci
That torque curve is flatter a mechanics ruler.
Yeah, that's awesome. KB can talk all the crap they want about their peak numbers and how much more efficient their twin-screw is compared to the roots, but nothing makes "under the curve" torque like a roots-style blower.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
bpmurr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by TTS197
Do you have chart SAE corrected? what kind of octane where you using?
93 Octane, I'll have to call Adrenaline tomorrow and ask them. I thought I took the graph for that one but I didn't. Uncorrected was
508.57
495.53

Last edited by bpmurr; Apr 9, 2010 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:11 PM
  #6  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
You didn't increase your rev limiter did you? I am not a fan of this unless you have funds to build a motor.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:13 PM
  #7  
bpmurr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by eci
You didn't increase your rev limiter did you? I am not a fan of this unless you have funds to build a motor.
I'll have to ask JJ where he left it at. Isn't stock 6250? I know it shows the redline at 6k.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #8  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
6250 yes
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
TTS197's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by bpmurr
I'll have to call Adrenaline tomorrow and ask them. I thought I took the graph for that one but I didn't. Uncorrected was
508.57
495.53
cool beans, car sound awesome by the way!!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #10  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
You know the dyno graph shows he let go at 6250, most guys who up it rev it out to 6500. You should be good.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by eci
You didn't increase your rev limiter did you? I am not a fan of this unless you have funds to build a motor.
I've never believed there isn't a margin of error. Its not like you go boom of you exceed by a few hundred.

Case in point, Ford did nothing to the 08/09 Bullitt internals yet they bumped it to 6500.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #12  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
I've never believed there isn't a margin of error. Its not like you go boom of you exceed by a few hundred.

Case in point, Ford did nothing to the 08/09 Bullitt internals yet they bumped it to 6500.
No, you don't automatically go boom of course. RPM is the killer of this motor though on stock rods. I'd rather just add more boost and keep it at 6250.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Congrats!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM
Cdvision
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Sep 5, 2015 05:22 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM
Kestral
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:52 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 AM.