The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums

The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums (https://themustangsource.com/forums/)
-   Ecoboost (https://themustangsource.com/forums/f849/)
-   -   400HP 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost (https://themustangsource.com/forums/f849/400hp-2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost-536622/)

mark0006 4/10/15 11:21 AM

400HP 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost
 
Not Bad.

http://www.dpccars.com/gallery/var/r...HJoWDqq-JR.jpg

From the article:
The 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine of the ‘Stang was taken to over 400 ponies and 400 lb-ft (542 Nm), which is quite a long way from the factory stock rating of 310 hp and 230 lb-ft (312 Nm).

3 pictures and video in the gallery

.

SpeedCostsMoney 4/10/15 12:30 PM

Nice! I was wonfering when tuners would get around to it.

orange3.9stang 4/11/15 07:12 AM

Mark ...

Stock Mustang 2.3L EB Torque is 320 lb-ft @ 3000 RPM, not 230 !!

Doug

2k7gtcs 4/11/15 07:23 AM

Why does it have to play the cylinder card in the article?


I swear the whole society is a victim society. :shame:

Mustang Freak 4/11/15 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs (Post 6917664)
Why does it have to play the cylinder card in the article? I swear the whole society is a victim society. :shame:

Cylinder racist! :-)

ConeBoss 4/15/15 02:52 PM

Hrmm, I would be more impressed if that power was achieved via stock turbo...a turbo upgrade as a claimed "Bolt-on" is a little questionable in my opinion.

Stevedotmil 4/21/15 08:13 PM

It's just as much "bolt-on" as a BOSS or CJ intake. It's getting more air into the engine while doing it more efficiently.

houtex 4/21/15 08:34 PM


Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs (Post 6917664)
Why does it have to play the cylinder card in the article?


I swear the whole society is a victim society. :shame:


Originally Posted by Mustang Freak (Post 6917673)
Cylinder racist! :-)

'Cylindrist.' Calling it.

Paris MkVI 4/22/15 12:29 PM

24PSI??

Good Lord.

I guess they are building these Ecoboost blocks more hardened. But 24PSI doesn't sound like a long engine lifespan to me.

houtex 4/22/15 07:21 PM

The brightest stars burn the quickest.

So it is with this... the quickest Ecoboost blows up soon(tm). :D

Stevedotmil 5/14/15 09:12 AM

Has it blown up yet?

2 Go Snake 5/14/15 03:10 PM

I wonder what the cost of mods were. I would expect a 400 horsepower Ecoboost will turn some impressive quarter mile times. The 4 cylinder block should handle 24 psi boost for quite a while. I so want an Ecoboost to play with as a fun car.

topoffGT 5/18/15 08:06 AM

I will be getting my Ecoboost tuned by Roush soon. I drove an Ecoboost Roush yesterday that has this new tune, which is covered under factory warranty. I was quite impressed! It puts down about 326hp to the wheels. Not sure about the torque numbers. I will keep you posted.

Music man in Pcola 5/18/15 12:05 PM

As great as this is, to me it is similar to a 150 pound guy lifting 275 pounds, whereas a 225 pound guy can lift the same 275 pounds without sweating. Work a four cylinder to death to achieve the same horsepower as the 5.0...WHY? Just sayin'

topoffGT 5/18/15 01:20 PM

I have supercharged Mustangs for when I want max power. I drive my Ecoboost Mustang daily for work, which is mostly highway. The new tune will give me a nice balance of economy and power. That's my reasoning. So far my best mileage on a 200 mile trip has been 33.9 mpgs.

Automatic 5.0 5/18/15 06:38 PM

Nice, until they start burning up and breaking pistons like the Focus ST is.

JoeMidnight 5/20/15 07:27 AM


Originally Posted by Music man in Pcola (Post 6926352)
As great as this is, to me it is similar to a 150 pound guy lifting 275 pounds, whereas a 225 pound guy can lift the same 275 pounds without sweating. Work a four cylinder to death to achieve the same horsepower as the 5.0...WHY? Just sayin'



I get what you're saying but this is a bad analogy. If a 150LBS guy can lift 275lbs where as a 225lbs guy can lift 275, to me, the 150lbs guy is stronger. Meaning if I am following you, the EB has better potential.

Coyote5-0 5/20/15 11:26 AM

wow, upgraded turbo and only 400hp? Guys have been getting more out of 4 cylinders than that for YEARS. I'm not that impressed.

Rodsmustang 5/20/15 03:05 PM


Originally Posted by Coyote5-0 (Post 6926881)
wow, upgraded turbo and only 400hp? Guys have been getting more out of 4 cylinders than that for YEARS. I'm not that impressed.


Agree


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands