2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Weight gain is less than 100 lbs., trim for trim

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/13/14, 08:52 AM
  #21  
Cobra Member
 
69Mach1-409's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Boomer
Hypothetical question.
If it lost 200lbs(weigh 3500lbs in V8 manual trim), would you be happy with a $5000 increase in price?
Or if it weighed 3400lbs, would you pay an extra $7,000, or $10,000?


Nothing is free. And keep in mind there is nothing out there sharing this configuration/platform right now.


I'll be waiting to see the next gen Camaro that is made with pixie dust that will weigh a magical 3500lbs in V8 trim that everyone is 'talking' about.
You're already looking at $40k for a decently equipped GT.. With a clean sheet design, like this was, they could of gone lighter and kept the price in the same range.

If Chevy made the Camaro with magical pixie dust there would still be a recall on it..
Old 6/13/14, 09:28 AM
  #22  
Cobra Member
 
AWmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I bet they are using the F150 and it's considerable sales volume / economies of scale to bring the price impact down on the high strength steal and aluminum components. We will see weight decreases in other more main stream cars next (Explorer, Edge and Taurus, etc...), then the low volume Mustang will benefit from these weight saving materials without a major hit to the price tag. I'm sure when Ford said it's reducing the weight of its cars it was talking more long term. It will come, just in the next redesign.
Old 6/13/14, 09:41 AM
  #23  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Getportfolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,473
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
So she's FAT.

I still love her.
Old 6/13/14, 10:18 AM
  #24  
Cobra Member
 
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
Hypothetical question.
If it lost 200lbs(weigh 3500lbs in V8 manual trim), would you be happy with a $5000 increase in price?
Or if it weighed 3400lbs, would you pay an extra $7,000, or $10,000?


Nothing is free. And keep in mind there is nothing out there sharing this configuration/platform right now.


I'll be waiting to see the next gen Camaro that is made with pixie dust that will weigh a magical 3500lbs in V8 trim that everyone is 'talking' about.
I thought the new camaro was being built on the same platform as the ATS?

If so, a current RWD ATS 3.6L Premium (so basically everything), weighs in at 3629.

Add the 6.2 and all the other bits and pieces and I bet it comes out around the same as the 2015 Mustang.
Old 6/13/14, 10:56 AM
  #25  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by 69Mach1-409
With a clean sheet design, like this was, they could of gone lighter and kept the price in the same range.


Why does everyone ASSUME that just because it's a clean slate that it won't gain weight from the previous generation?
If money was no object, I'd say sure. Like I said before "Nothing is free"


Ford had to build and balance a car that spans no less than 3 distinct markets (and their finances), keep future requirements for safety and it's own targets in mind/check, without increasing the cost too much, attracting new buyers, pleasing enthusiasts, and keeping returning customers.
Not an easy job....


Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
I thought the new camaro was being built on the same platform as the ATS?
If so, a current RWD ATS 3.6L Premium (so basically everything), weighs in at 3629.

And the CTS as well, which weighs in at 3615-3976lbs.
That's not even the V8. So I'll believe it when I see it.
Old 6/13/14, 11:43 AM
  #26  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Captain Spadaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 30, 2004
Location: Romeoville, Illinois
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
Hypothetical question.
If it lost 200lbs(weigh 3500lbs in V8 manual trim), would you be happy with a $5000 increase in price?
Or if it weighed 3400lbs, would you pay an extra $7,000, or $10,000?


Nothing is free. And keep in mind there is nothing out there sharing this configuration/platform right now.


I'll be waiting to see the next gen Camaro that is made with pixie dust that will weigh a magical 3500lbs in V8 trim that everyone is 'talking' about.
Point taken.
Old 6/13/14, 12:01 PM
  #27  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Captain Spadaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 30, 2004
Location: Romeoville, Illinois
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AWmustang
I bet they are using the F150 and it's considerable sales volume / economies of scale to bring the price impact down on the high strength steal and aluminum components. We will see weight decreases in other more main stream cars next (Explorer, Edge and Taurus, etc...), then the low volume Mustang will benefit from these weight saving materials without a major hit to the price tag. I'm sure when Ford said it's reducing the weight of its cars it was talking more long term. It will come, just in the next redesign.
I would hope so.

Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
I thought the new camaro was being built on the same platform as the ATS?

If so, a current RWD ATS 3.6L Premium (so basically everything), weighs in at 3629.

Add the 6.2 and all the other bits and pieces and I bet it comes out around the same as the 2015 Mustang.
Yes, it is. However, most of GM's resources regarding the Alpha platform are currently being diverted towards finishing the ATS coupe and developing V-series cars for the ATS and CTS. I wouldn't be surprised if 6th gen Camaro development, up to this point, was limited to preliminary planning meetings, as GM probably wants to know what Ford is bringing to the table. That said, I suspect that the 6th gen Camaro will be a smidge lighter than the 6th gen Mustang at launch, simply because GM has more applications for Alpha (don't forget, it will underpin every RWD car they make save the Caddy flagship).

As for the Mustang, I wouldn't be surprised if Ford was readying a weight loss regimen for S550 over its life, partially because I suspect S550 will be sticking around for more than one product cycle (at present, its the only RWD passenger car platform Ford has, and no other applications have been confirmed for it yet), and partially because the fact that the 6th gen Camaro will be moving to Alpha isn't a very well kept secret (you know Ford isn't gonna want to let GM have the upper hand for very long).

Last edited by Captain Spadaro; 6/13/14 at 06:49 PM.
Old 6/13/14, 12:23 PM
  #28  
Bullitt Member
 
dave07's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 18, 2013
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bluejoker
A gain of even 1 lb is a disappointment considering the rumors were that it was going to shed 2-300 lbs. 3700 lbs for a 'performance' vehicle seems almost laughable on paper, especially considering that its a brand new platform; with so little actual performance information being released, it's hard not to get a little upset over this kind of thing.
x2

3700 is approaching slowmaro weight.
Old 6/13/14, 01:18 PM
  #29  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
If you mean over 200lbs difference, then yes.

Camaro SS Coupe - 3935lbs
Camaro SS Verte - 4197lbs
Camaro ZL1 Coupe - 4120lbs
Camaro ZL1 Verte - 4374lbs
Camaro Z28 Coupe - 3820lbs

AND they can still perform.
Old 6/13/14, 05:08 PM
  #30  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course, that's the current Rubenesque Camaro, which will be replaced in a year or so with a putatively smaller and lighter one based of the Caddy ATS's chassis.

I wonder if these two mortal rivals will meet in the middle, mass wise, or whether the F car will capitalize on a chance to undercut that Stang at weigh in.

I suspect the Challenger will remain the big boy for a while yet.
Old 6/13/14, 05:21 PM
  #31  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The rumors about the Gen 6 Camaro are as ridiculous as the S550 Mustang rumors. Let's face it, the gross majority of internet rags have no clue what they're talking about, and publish garbage to get clicks. As with concrete info on the new Mustang, a grain of salt should be used when taking these "reports" into consideration.
Old 6/13/14, 05:36 PM
  #32  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No doubt and I suspect the likely scenario being both cars coming in around the 3,700 mark in V8 trim.
Old 6/13/14, 09:50 PM
  #33  
Cobra Member
 
RandyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 23, 2009
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 1,312
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The 2014 Corvette is heavier than the 2013, but by most accounts is more satisfying to drive. Weight is unquestionably a factor in performance but it's not the only factor. While I would have preferred to see the car lose a couple hundred pounds, I'll wait until people are actually driving them before declaring the new car a failure. Would I be willing to pay thousands extra so Ford could have replaced more steel with aluminum? I spent as much as I could afford on my 2011, so no, I wouldn't be happy if the weight went down but the price went appreciably higher.
Old 6/14/14, 05:34 AM
  #34  
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
David Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes on 100 Posts
I onced weighed 200 lbs, i now weigh 150 lbs. The Mustangs weight gain doesn't look so bad now
Old 6/14/14, 07:17 AM
  #35  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmichaels's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 2,460
Received 111 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
Hypothetical question.
If it lost 200lbs(weigh 3500lbs in V8 manual trim), would you be happy with a $5000 increase in price?
Or if it weighed 3400lbs, would you pay an extra $7,000, or $10,000?


Nothing is free. And keep in mind there is nothing out there sharing this configuration/platform right now.


I'll be waiting to see the next gen Camaro that is made with pixie dust that will weigh a magical 3500lbs in V8 trim that everyone is 'talking' about.
Well put - many would probably not, myself included.
Old 6/14/14, 08:27 AM
  #36  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
I wish everyone would shut up until real world performance numbers are obtained. For all we know it will be much faster then the S197 on the track (road course or strip).

If it's shown to be slower then ya'll can start complaining.
Old 6/14/14, 08:29 AM
  #37  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
It's nice that everyone wants a lighter car, and I'm sure so would Ford.
But there are so many factors in play here.


Some people are acting like Ford kicked their kittens while pouring sugar in their gas tank and lighting a flaming bag of dog crap on their porch for not making it lighter.


I'm not defending or getting upset over the weight gain, I'm just being realistic.


I'm sure people had the same thoughts as the size and weight crept up over the years, we just didn't have the internet around to see all the wonderfully coloured comments from people about it
Old 6/14/14, 12:19 PM
  #38  
Mach 1 Member
 
mrp5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2011
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The added weight doesn't bother me. I still can't get over how ugly the car is. All of the wheel options are awful looking as well. Oh well, not like I was gonna buy one anyways. Just disappointed that it's not something I can get excited about.
Old 6/18/14, 09:46 AM
  #39  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Like many I would have loved to see a 200lbs lighter stang. But this isn't so bad. One stat you won't find but is surly better is unsprung weight. I bet that droped a lot and that is weight you do feel when driving.
Old 6/18/14, 10:51 AM
  #40  
Cobra Member
 
2 Go Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Unhappy

I am not happy with any weight gain. I hope the Ford engineers find a way to put the Mustang on a diet. If it has a two piece driveshaft, I hope they find a way to replace it with an aluminum single driveshaft. Maybe they can find other ways to nock of another 30 pounds.


Quick Reply: Weight gain is less than 100 lbs., trim for trim



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.