Originally Posted by sqidd (Post 7019389)

Bwaaaahaaaaaahaaaaa!!!! It could maybe be done on e85. But certainly not with the kit as delivered.

And 8psi........LOL. Clearly someone down at Whipple screwed up. Ballpark boost numbers are easy. At 14.7psi (one additional atmosphere) you roughly double what a motor makes stock. That's assuming 100% efficency and no parasitic loss, which is impossible. So a 400rwhp Yote, which is pretty middle of the road with exhaust takes an additional .75 atmosphere to make 700rwhp. .75 atmosphere is 11.025psi. And remember, that's at 100% efficiency and no parasitic loss.

At 11psi a Yote with exhaust and headers will make 600-625rwhp. There is no way that it's doing it at 8psi. 11psi is also the octane limit of 93. So 700rwhp at 8psi on 93 octane is impossible on two different fronts.

Originally Posted by sqidd (Post 6968681)

Where do you suggest someone find those sources?

-According to you you can't trust the vendors and manufacturers (for the most part you can't).

-You can't trust magazines. There are no longer tech reviews or tests. Everything you see is a paid advertisement.

-Most of the customer base is woefully technically unqualified to asses the performance of a supercharger they own. They have personal bias and the conscious or subconscious defense of a large purchase. And in most case they have only ever owned one supercharger which means they don't have anything to compare it to.

-And a few of the big names that have stellar reputations are tarted up junk. So you can't trust reputation.

I'm seriously curious where you think that people can get good, accurate, unbiased facts from? This is not me arguing. This is me genuinely curious about what you think. If there is a solution to the "problem" I'm all ears. Because I think it's a big problem (the lack of reliable buying information).

Originally Posted by Stage_3 (Post 7019394)

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 7019393)

But yeah, I consider it close to 700 crank-hp as it sits.

Originally Posted by crjackson2134 (Post 7019390)

So at 11 psi and under the most optimistic conditions (it never is though), in Candyland, you could market it as 700 BHP.

Originally Posted by sqidd (Post 7019407)

But most of that is dog and pony show bull**** too. I can make ANYTHING sow more HP on the dyno by stacking variables in the favor of more HP. Variables that you can't stack in real life. Additionally a lot of dyno operators are guilty of juke-ing the numbers higher through dyno parameter changes (keystrokes) because they know high numbers are what the customer wants to see.

I see more fantasy claims on the internet than realistic ones. 75% fantasy, 25% realistic.

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 7019393)

I'm slightly over 600 rwhp with stock headers/cats, my little 2.3 Whipple delivering 9.8 psi during that 608 rwhp / 517 rwtq dyno run.
With a smalller pulley, no cats, and with longtubes, running e85, I can see the set-up putting out closer to 650 rwhp.
But I wouldn't consider that a safe set-up.
Heck, I'm careful driving mine now, since I really can't afford to blow it up.

Originally Posted by Stage_3 (Post 7019421)

Heck Gabe,....with longtubes, smaller pulley and E85/E85 tune, you'd be more closer to 700rwhp. I would run cats though, even though I have heard that E85 does a number on them.

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 7019429)

Probably, but I'm not willing to push this engine any harder. It's a blast at the current power level, and I'm already taking it easy on it wondering if the next pull will be the one that makes things go boom.
I plan on building my own engine soon, but I really want a GT500, and I'd love to build a monster 5.4 for it.

Originally Posted by Stage_3 (Post 7019439)

(Sounds like you and I are on the same mindset.) Either way,....it's a win-win Gabe! So, you'd get the older Shelby with the 5.4 or a newer Shelby with the 5.8? Either one is great and will make stupid power/torque with mods.

If you build your engine, what are looking to do?
I thought about the MMR 1000Kit. (forged bottom end kit and other stuff I would add on. I actually posted on it at the other Mustang forum. I added it up, it's HUGE money. lol Not including labor to do the MMR1000 and other mods install. That is why I am holding out at the moment. I have the funds, but I want to make sure I want to fully commit before the new GT500 is coming out as well as a couple other cars I am interested in.)
Good luck man! Keep us posted. :nice:

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 7019454)

I'd be looking at a '11+, but more likely a '13-'14 car, since the cool tail lights and 5.8 engine.

MMR, I would never buy anything from them, they have a terrible reputation.

Originally Posted by Stage_3 (Post 7019460)

Nice!! 2011 and up sounds killer. Should be beastly. Torque galore.

I never knew that about MMR. I guess I need to some homework. :doh:
Who else would sell forged kits for the Coyotes Gabe? Good, quality stuff.

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 7019485)

L&M makes great stuff
https://www.lmengines.com/engines/5-0l-coyote.html

Originally Posted by sqidd (Post 7019505)

L&M FTW

Originally Posted by silverstate777 (Post 6960953)

Forced induction is very satisfying. My ‘14 GT has the modest Roush phase 2 kit with a 91 octane aftermarket tune. 12,000+ trouble free miles so far and no regrets.

Originally Posted by silverstate777 (Post 6960953)

Forced induction is very satisfying. My ‘14 GT has the modest Roush phase 2 kit with a 91 octane aftermarket tune. 12,000+ trouble free miles so far and no regrets.

Originally Posted by 5.0MustangNamedTyrone (Post 7083664)

what was the damage

Originally Posted by crjackson (Post 7083682)

I think he means the damage to his bank account. It’s a common phrase meaning how much did it cost you.

Originally Posted by crjackson (Post 7083685)

Yeah, I know. Mine is fully forged / blown for years. I think you meant to direct that comment to @5.0MustangNamedTyrone .