5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

412 HP w/ 91 octane, what about 93?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 11:58 AM
  #41  
Skotty's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
Originally Posted by VAiN
This internet bench racing cracks me up... wait until the car is in your driveway, and then try to focus on a decent timeslip.
Haven't heard squat the last month and a half. What else are we gonna do? :-P
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #42  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by VAiN
This internet bench racing cracks me up... wait until the car is in your driveway, and then try to focus on a decent timeslip.
I don't see this as Internet racing. Someone asked a legit question and I don't see anything wrong with trying to come up with answers. The best deal will be when we can see some dyno numbers but there's nothing wrong with an educated guess is there?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 04:28 PM
  #43  
VAiN's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 28, 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1trickpony
I don't see this as Internet racing. Someone asked a legit question and I don't see anything wrong with trying to come up with answers. The best deal will be when we can see some dyno numbers but there's nothing wrong with an educated guess is there?
An educated guess is one thing... but this thread seems kind of silly to me. The question was basically answered in the first reply - yes, there will *some* benefit to higher octane - that's common sense.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #44  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by VAiN
An educated guess is one thing... but this thread seems kind of silly to me. The question was basically answered in the first reply - yes, there will *some* benefit to higher octane - that's common sense.
Incorrect. If your ignition timing is only tuned for maximum performance (without detonation) for using say 87 octane, then there will be no benefit to higher octane. You're just burning money. Ask our Country's famous nuclear scientist Dr. Bill Wattenburg... (or any tuner).

http://www.kgoam810.com/sectional.asp?id=33179

Last edited by cdynaco; Mar 14, 2010 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #45  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
I agree, the answer is not cut and dry. The 4.0 for example got zero benefit from higher octane. MM & FF or 5.0 ran it with 87 and 91 octane and there was no improvement. With a tune, the 4.0 picked up 3 HP. The 4.6 3V gained 5 HP stock going to 91 octane. So its not a simple answer, it depends on the engine.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:17 AM
  #46  
First Stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2006
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Woth getting a custom tune for a 2011?

With the adaptive spark ignition and cold air intake on the 2011's, would there be any value in getting a canned performance tune and after-market CAI?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:20 AM
  #47  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by First Stang
With the adaptive spark ignition and cold air intake on the 2011's, would there be any value in getting a canned performance tune and after-market CAI?
Good question. Why not e mail a tuner and see what they think. E mail Tillman or Brenspeed.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:30 AM
  #48  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
the stock CAI box in the 11 is the same in the 10. I just put in the Steeda CAI with a tune. And there's worlds of difference. So I'd imagine, there would be some benefit to the '11 maybe not as pronounced? maybe a lot more- who knows... but there will be some.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #49  
First Stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2006
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
the stock CAI box in the 11 is the same in the 10. I just put in the Steeda CAI with a tune. And there's worlds of difference. So I'd imagine, there would be some benefit to the '11 maybe not as pronounced? maybe a lot more- who knows... but there will be some.
But I don't think that the 2010 had the adaptive spark ignition except for the Bullitt?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:40 AM
  #50  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
I believe the 2010 GT's have it as well. Which is why I ran premium the whole way even before I had a tune.

"Best of all, both engines will be able to run on regular unleaded just fine. According to powertrain supervisor Chris Roxin, "The 2010 Mustang runs great on regular fuel, and that is where we quote our peak numbers, but we also have a great dual-adaptive knock calibration that allows the 2010 Mustang to run on regular fuel as well as premium fuel, and the system figures it out itself." He added that premium fuel can improve the torque of the engine in the low- to mid-rpm range."

Source- bottom of the page.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:09 AM
  #51  
dmhines's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2006
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 5
From: Cumming, GA
My guess is the 2011 has 2 timing tables. Regular fuel and premium fuel. I highly doubt Ford built in 3 tables to cover 87, 91 and 93.

The 2010 is the same. Pretty sure the 315HP is based on running 91+ octane.

Last edited by dmhines; Apr 22, 2010 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:14 AM
  #52  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
^^ see my above post.

According to powertrain supervisor Chris Roxin, "The 2010 Mustang runs great on regular fuel, and that is where we quote our peak numbers..."
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #53  
dmhines's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2006
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 5
From: Cumming, GA
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
^^ see my above post.

According to powertrain supervisor Chris Roxin, "The 2010 Mustang runs great on regular fuel, and that is where we quote our peak numbers..."
Sweet. That's cool since I run 87 in mine.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #54  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Most def. knowing the '10s quote their peak on regular and the 11's can run on it as well- but the peak numbers are on mid grade (91) - but that's still a good savings $ wise... Considering the Camaro SS and Challenger R/T & SRT8 only take premium.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #55  
dmhines's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2006
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 5
From: Cumming, GA
I live in Georgia. Our gas stations only have 87, 89 and 93 so running premium is almost 40 cents more per gallon.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:35 AM
  #56  
maddog69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City MO
The 2010 From page 281:

Octane recommendations (4.6L V8 engine)
Your vehicle will run normally on 87 octane regular fuel without
damaging the engine, but premium fuel with an octane rating of 91
(R+M)/2 or higher is recommended for best overall performance.
For Shelby GT500 octane requirements, see the Shelby GT500
Supplement.

Last edited by maddog69; Apr 22, 2010 at 08:53 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #57  
maddog69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City MO
And the 2011 page 294:

Octane recommendations (5.0L V8 engine)
Your vehicle will run normally on 87 octane regular fuel without
damaging the engine, but premium fuel with an octane rating of 91
(R+M)/2 or higher is recommended for best overall performance.
For Shelby GT500 octane requirements, see the Shelby GT500
Supplement.

Last edited by maddog69; Apr 22, 2010 at 08:53 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #58  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
91 to 93.... 500hp...yep definatly


can i buy a vowel?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 05:24 PM
  #59  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
For the Porsche the difference between 91 and 93 octane is right around 8hp and 6lbs of tq. However, this car was tuned to run on 93 octane and detunes the car when you run on 91.

Dave
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #60  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
^^ see my above post.

According to powertrain supervisor Chris Roxin, "The 2010 Mustang runs great on regular fuel, and that is where we quote our peak numbers..."
Right - its the 08 Bullitt Adaptive Spark Ignition system carried forward for the '10 GT 4.6. The 09 GT did not have Bullitt upgrades. And Ford's Press Release for Bullitt stated that 91 premium will add up to 10 lb ft of torque between 1k and 4k. Not one comment about HP changes. The 315HP was based on 87 reg.

Where some guys are getting this fantastic HP increase and 93 octane ratings is beyond me. I'm from Missouri - show me Ford's documentation.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.