How do you feel about your '10-'14 after the reveal of the S550?
#81
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
...
The real question is, what is so good about a solid axle rear end. The answer is, unless you're drag racing with 1,000+hp or offroading, nothing. It has no advantage over an independent rear suspension on the streets. NONE. There is no situation in performance driving where you want the rear end of the chassis to be bounced up and down and tossed side to side mid-corner. That's why every performance car on earth, from the Bugatti Veyron down to the Mini Cooper use an IRS.
...
The real question is, what is so good about a solid axle rear end. The answer is, unless you're drag racing with 1,000+hp or offroading, nothing. It has no advantage over an independent rear suspension on the streets. NONE. There is no situation in performance driving where you want the rear end of the chassis to be bounced up and down and tossed side to side mid-corner. That's why every performance car on earth, from the Bugatti Veyron down to the Mini Cooper use an IRS.
...
Also, a good solid rear axle set up is better than a so-so IRS. See the SN95 Cobra for an example of a not so great IRS that a lot of people do end up swapping for the solid axle...
Otherwise, I think you're right on.
#82
Mach 1 Member
I am still having fun with and I am still in love with my 13. I really like what I've seen inside and out with the 15, but no reason to sell or trade yet. I will definitely check out a 15 when my local dealer gets one in and I might even test drive it. In 4 or 5 years, and a couple iterations with tweaking the new platform, who knows...
#83
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 13, 2010
Location: Cen-tex
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have owned a 12 boss, 13 boss, 13 manual gt and now an auto 13. If the car is what all the articles are saying I would give my 13 up in a second. Don't get me wrong I like my car, but it is not the best put together car in the world. Had a ton of trans/clutch issues with the bosses, solid axle (good for racing) but is a terrible ride, had the ticking issues with the 5.0 in the gt and the interior is pretty cheap (although better than previous mustangs). I hope the new one has worked out issues with motor/trans. The new one looks to be a great mix of new tech and keeping the mustang heritage alive. I love little dumb stuff on cars and am so glad the new one has memory seats, heated/cooled seats, IRS, launch control, engine start button/ w keyless entry, not to mention the forged parts from boss. I will be trying to get one 5-6 months after release to see if there is any major bugs with them.
#84
I love mine 13 mustang but wish I have all the interior and suspension of the new one. The exterior of the 15 is not a factor to like the car . Infact I dont like the exterior .
Last edited by BlueFirePony; 12/9/13 at 06:19 PM.
#85
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same boat
I am still having fun with and I am still in love with my 13. I really like what I've seen inside and out with the 15, but no reason to sell or trade yet. I will definitely check out a 15 when my local dealer gets one in and I might even test drive it. In 4 or 5 years, and a couple iterations with tweaking the new platform, who knows...
My least favorite angle is the back of the car. As far as I'm concerned the tail lights on the 13 -14 models are the best ever on any year Mustang.
SO, will I trade. Not now. My GHIG GT is only a year old. I've upgraded it with a new shift, FRPP Tune, SVE Drifts and I love the color. The biggest disappointment in the new car is the colors... nothing excites me there. I want to see some road tests, driving experiences and see the car up close. If the performance is a major step up, maybe I'll pull the trigger on a 2016.
#86
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 13, 2010
Location: Cen-tex
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do I feel about my 2014 GT after seeing the 2015? Better than ever!
The obvious thing has happened. To make a global car you have to take popular ques from international markets. That's why the 2015 looks like a blended hodge-podge of different designs. My 2014 is a MUSTANG. The 2015 is a Fusion GT coupe.
The obvious thing has happened. To make a global car you have to take popular ques from international markets. That's why the 2015 looks like a blended hodge-podge of different designs. My 2014 is a MUSTANG. The 2015 is a Fusion GT coupe.
#87
I view the new mustang as evolutionary but not revolutionary. It's not like the difference between a 1967 corvette and the new 1968. That was a marked contrast. I like my lowly 2012 gt and won't trade it in on 2015 for a marginal hp increase and slightly better handling. Can't wait to see how the market responds to this car though. I just don't see this as a colossal sales success aside from the initial bump in sales just for being new.
Also, depends on what type of rebates Ford will put on it. Everybody talks about this new world class advanced Mustang but how much is that going to cost the consumer. The mustang has always been the affordable pony car and world class may equal much higher price. Maybe or maybe not.
If people want world class performance in their Mustang then hopefully those same people won't complain should it cost base mid 30's.
#88
Bullitt Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Location: N'awlins/SoCal
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude, you said it all. I was in the same exact place. The 370Z was going to be the ticket for me, too. I just woke up and realized I've always had fast jap two seaters. I just came out of a 2007 S2K and knew I needed to step up into a V8 with a stick. After hearing about the progress with the rear suspension and 5.0, I was sold and intentionally bought the last of the retro GTs - the 14.
I have zero regrets and still love my car, but I'm no fool; I know what a reworked independent suspension will do for this car - and people are forgetting the fact that the S550 has a revised front suspension, too.
In addition to the awesome selection of interior materials - "...what looks like metal is metal" - the new GT will have significantly improved NVH by losing the log, increasing the actual driving pleasure.
Lots of folks are hung up on the perceived loss of the muscle car image, but I'm telling you - it only takes one drive in a balanced and powerful car to change your perception. I welcome the Mustang's entrance into the sports car arena, although a bit more of a diet wouldn't hurt hehe.
I have zero regrets and still love my car, but I'm no fool; I know what a reworked independent suspension will do for this car - and people are forgetting the fact that the S550 has a revised front suspension, too.
In addition to the awesome selection of interior materials - "...what looks like metal is metal" - the new GT will have significantly improved NVH by losing the log, increasing the actual driving pleasure.
Lots of folks are hung up on the perceived loss of the muscle car image, but I'm telling you - it only takes one drive in a balanced and powerful car to change your perception. I welcome the Mustang's entrance into the sports car arena, although a bit more of a diet wouldn't hurt hehe.
I love the new design! I think it's more the type of car I would normally buy. When I started shopping I looked at the 370z and the gt as my final options. The z fit my driving style better and I loved it. The gt fit my heart better. I wanted a mustang again ever since my 67, that never ran, in high school. The retro look sealed it for me. I always wanted a classic but wanted modern convenience. My car has too much sentimental value for me to consider trading it. That said, if I could keep my car and buy another car, the 15 would be it. I like it more than any other car on the road.
#89
I Have No Life
I really like my `12 but after seeing this new S550 I have second thoughts about all the changes I want to do to my 5.0. "Why spend the money on this car when I can do the stuff to the new one." Like others have said it's not perfect (what car is) but the good points outweigh the bad ones IMO. It's lower wider leaner and meaner and seems to have everything that an Enthusiast wants from his/her GT.
Agree.
Dude, you said it all. I was in the same exact place. The 370Z was going to be the ticket for me, too. I just woke up and realized I've always had fast jap two seaters. I just came out of a 2007 S2K and knew I needed to step up into a V8 with a stick. After hearing about the progress with the rear suspension and 5.0, I was sold and intentionally bought the last of the retro GTs - the 14. I have zero regrets and still love my car, but I'm no fool; I know what a reworked independent suspension will do for this car - and people are forgetting the fact that the S550 has a revised front suspension, too. In addition to the awesome selection of interior materials - "...what looks like metal is metal" - the new GT will have significantly improved NVH by losing the log, increasing the actual driving pleasure. Lots of folks are hung up on the perceived loss of the muscle car image, but I'm telling you - it only takes one drive in a balanced and powerful car to change your perception. I welcome the Mustang's entrance into the sports car arena, although a bit more of a diet wouldn't hurt hehe.
Given all that, I think I've preached my story in other threads: 2015 is decent looking for a new mainstream car. But I don't think it screams mustang. Thus, I much much much prefer the 11-12. Just personal preference.
#90
GT Member
Join Date: August 4, 2011
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The tech in the 15 will make our cars look ancient. Two words "Burnout Button" To compare I can get my 11 vert V6 auto to burn out with snow tires on a warm day.
#91
Shelby GT500 Member
They are FAR better at cornering and at keeping the car flat and level when the road isn't.
The easiest way to tell the difference is hitting a bump while going through a corner. The solid axle rear end will cause the car to bounce, lean, and throw the weight around. If you're pushing the car hard it could cause you to lose control. The reason is that the chassis sits on top of the axle, and if the axle goes up or down, so does the chassis.
An independent rear suspension has a hinge in the middle that allows the rear tires to move independently of the chassis. If you hit a bump going around a corner that one tire goes up and down, but the rest of the car remains flat and stable.
The real question is, what is so good about a solid axle rear end. The answer is, unless you're drag racing with 1,000+hp or offroading, nothing. It has no advantage over an independent rear suspension on the streets. NONE. There is no situation in performance driving where you want the rear end of the chassis to be bounced up and down and tossed side to side mid-corner. That's why every performance car on earth, from the Bugatti Veyron down to the Mini Cooper use an IRS.
Or, to put it another way... Would you want the independent suspension on the front of your Mustang removed and replaced with a solid axle? If not, why would you want one on the rear?
The easiest way to tell the difference is hitting a bump while going through a corner. The solid axle rear end will cause the car to bounce, lean, and throw the weight around. If you're pushing the car hard it could cause you to lose control. The reason is that the chassis sits on top of the axle, and if the axle goes up or down, so does the chassis.
An independent rear suspension has a hinge in the middle that allows the rear tires to move independently of the chassis. If you hit a bump going around a corner that one tire goes up and down, but the rest of the car remains flat and stable.
The real question is, what is so good about a solid axle rear end. The answer is, unless you're drag racing with 1,000+hp or offroading, nothing. It has no advantage over an independent rear suspension on the streets. NONE. There is no situation in performance driving where you want the rear end of the chassis to be bounced up and down and tossed side to side mid-corner. That's why every performance car on earth, from the Bugatti Veyron down to the Mini Cooper use an IRS.
Or, to put it another way... Would you want the independent suspension on the front of your Mustang removed and replaced with a solid axle? If not, why would you want one on the rear?
#92
Shelby GT500 Member
I like the look of the '15 and I think it will be an advancement in most areas. I would buy one of them given certain conditions--but those conditions haven't been met. I won't be trading in or selling my Shelby, for any car.
#93
Bullitt Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Location: N'awlins/SoCal
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's flawed logic. Because you'd do the same thing to a 2015, 16, 17, 18, 20, 90, 3015, and so on.... If you decide to mod, you will mod, and the loss in value would apply to any car any year.
Agree.
I had a 370z before my 12, hence my username . I got rid of it to get in true American muscle ...
Given all that, I think I've preached my story in other threads: 2015 is decent looking for a new mainstream car. But I don't think it screams mustang. Thus, I much much much prefer the 11-12. Just personal preference.
Agree.
I had a 370z before my 12, hence my username . I got rid of it to get in true American muscle ...
Given all that, I think I've preached my story in other threads: 2015 is decent looking for a new mainstream car. But I don't think it screams mustang. Thus, I much much much prefer the 11-12. Just personal preference.
A competent driver will not benefit at all from an IRS on city streets/highways. Only the very, very best drivers will benefit from it on a reasonably paved road course. The most incompetent of drivers will benefit from it, as they have no idea how to drive a vehicle yet. The IRS to 99% of drivers is akin to the new auto-parallel-park "feature" with which some cars are now being equipped. Yes, I'd love to have an IRS in my Shelby, but I can easily augment my suspension to hug the road around turns well enough to stick to anyone's tail and do the passing on the straightaways on track days. Street driving, IRS is virtually useless--providing you're not behaving like an *** behind the wheel.
I think Moustang's heart is in the right place, but he doesn't really understand how the later Mustang's rear suspension works. My former Sr Manager and friend gets an SVT every 10 years. He currently has a 94 and 04 which have been set up properly and regularly whip prepped Porsches and others around big and little Willow. His SRAs aren't holding him back and he is several chassis revisions behind where we are. And guess what - Miatas still whip everyone else's butts around the twisties and it's just a fact.
In the real world, the only benefit a IRS will give you is a quieter ride at an equivalent performance level. There will be no UCA/LCAs, PBs, etc to transmit noise into the cabin. Now, I would take IRS over SRA any day of the week, but as it stands, the 10-14s are fun an very capable cars.
I'm going to enjoy mine for 4-5 years, then will pick up a new one later. Every time I turn the key, my ears and body are treated to the rumble of the V8. Every time I stab the gas, I am pulled back into my seat and I wonder how the car is maintaining a straight line and is failing to get lift! The Coyote Mustang will ALWAYS scratch the muscle/sports car itch if set up right - and it only takes a few hundred dollars. The stock GT was just behind the same MY M3 under track conditions and that speaks volumes; M3s are beasts. This new S550 will def be a game changer in EU where the M3s live. At the end of the day a better driver than I can wring better numbers out of a stock GT than I can in my prepped GT TP, so what's at stake now other than my ego?
Last edited by fdesalvo; 12/10/13 at 10:40 AM.
#94
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
I just bought my '14 a couple months ago, and did so only after looking over as many renderings of the '15 as I could and gathering intel from the people I know within Ford. Now that the S550 has been officially revealed, I still feel that my decision was sound based on what I want in my car.
I'm a drag racer, so I value the solid axle in the '14. I've owned IRS cars, even V8 powered IRS cars, and while they are nice in the corners, that's not my focus. For drag racing, the solid axle is the better way to put the power down.
I really like the infotainment in the '14. My car has the factory electronics package with navigation. I do NOT like the MyFord Touch interface in the '15. We've had it since '11 in other Ford vehicles. Working in a Ford dealership and dealing with the frequent issues of MyFord Touch has turned me off to wanting it in my car. '14 is the last year for the "good" nav.
Styling. I think the front of the '10-'12's was the best ever from Team Mustang! That's the only thing I miss from my '11 GT. The '13-'14 front end has a better looking back end than the '10-'12, though. I like the big round head/fog lights as they look traditional and appropriate in a Mustang. The '15 front end does not look like a Mustang. It is more "corporate Ford" styling that really reminds me of any other Ford sedan. The rear 1/4 view of the '15 looks good. The new taillights are cool, but then, so are the taillights in the '14. I do not like the panel between the taillights of the '15, though, as it is much too big. The '15 rear looks much better when painted body color. The '15's we've seen with black plastic across the back above the diffuser look horrible.
Interior. I absolutely hate the interior of the '15. Way too busy, too many *****, switches, etc. MyFord Touch was supposed to get rid of the clutter by eliminating most of the hard switches. Unfortunately, MyFord Touch fails so frequently, that you need the hard switches as a back up for when MyFord Touch fails. The '10-'14 interior is much classier looking, IMO.
Performance? We have yet to get final power, weight, and performance #'s on the '15. At 200 lbs lighter and with roughly 20 hp more, the '15 5.0L will be a few tenths quicker at the drag strip. However, my '14 already runs 12.0's in the 1/4 mile with very minor mods (tune & converter) and should be running mid 11's by springtime with the next minor bolt on that I'm planning (LT headers and better tuning). Any quicker than 11.50 in the 1/4 mile requires a roll cage that I refuse to do, so I don't need the '15 to hit my performance goal.
Pricing: 15's will be introduced with a higher price; there's no way to cover the added content without a commensurate bump in price. Rebates will be minimal, if any, for most of the '15 model year, while '14's will have huge rebates from Ford to clear them out. Many dealers will hold out for bigger markups on the '15's initially, as well. So, the dealers will discount '14's more, Ford will rebate the '14's more, and the '15's will have a bump in price on top of that. Wouldn't surprise me if a '15 will cost $5000 to $8000 more than a comparably equipped '14 when these factors are accounted for.
I recognize that a lot of people will love the '15 and sales should be plentiful. I also know that a lot of people will scramble to get a '14 before they're all gone, though. I order all of the new cars for the dealership I work for and I'm going to order as many '14's as I can for the balance of production.
All in all, I think the '15 Mustang GT is a great looking car. It just isn't a great looking Mustang, IMO. I love my '14 more and more every time I look at a '15.
I'm a drag racer, so I value the solid axle in the '14. I've owned IRS cars, even V8 powered IRS cars, and while they are nice in the corners, that's not my focus. For drag racing, the solid axle is the better way to put the power down.
I really like the infotainment in the '14. My car has the factory electronics package with navigation. I do NOT like the MyFord Touch interface in the '15. We've had it since '11 in other Ford vehicles. Working in a Ford dealership and dealing with the frequent issues of MyFord Touch has turned me off to wanting it in my car. '14 is the last year for the "good" nav.
Styling. I think the front of the '10-'12's was the best ever from Team Mustang! That's the only thing I miss from my '11 GT. The '13-'14 front end has a better looking back end than the '10-'12, though. I like the big round head/fog lights as they look traditional and appropriate in a Mustang. The '15 front end does not look like a Mustang. It is more "corporate Ford" styling that really reminds me of any other Ford sedan. The rear 1/4 view of the '15 looks good. The new taillights are cool, but then, so are the taillights in the '14. I do not like the panel between the taillights of the '15, though, as it is much too big. The '15 rear looks much better when painted body color. The '15's we've seen with black plastic across the back above the diffuser look horrible.
Interior. I absolutely hate the interior of the '15. Way too busy, too many *****, switches, etc. MyFord Touch was supposed to get rid of the clutter by eliminating most of the hard switches. Unfortunately, MyFord Touch fails so frequently, that you need the hard switches as a back up for when MyFord Touch fails. The '10-'14 interior is much classier looking, IMO.
Performance? We have yet to get final power, weight, and performance #'s on the '15. At 200 lbs lighter and with roughly 20 hp more, the '15 5.0L will be a few tenths quicker at the drag strip. However, my '14 already runs 12.0's in the 1/4 mile with very minor mods (tune & converter) and should be running mid 11's by springtime with the next minor bolt on that I'm planning (LT headers and better tuning). Any quicker than 11.50 in the 1/4 mile requires a roll cage that I refuse to do, so I don't need the '15 to hit my performance goal.
Pricing: 15's will be introduced with a higher price; there's no way to cover the added content without a commensurate bump in price. Rebates will be minimal, if any, for most of the '15 model year, while '14's will have huge rebates from Ford to clear them out. Many dealers will hold out for bigger markups on the '15's initially, as well. So, the dealers will discount '14's more, Ford will rebate the '14's more, and the '15's will have a bump in price on top of that. Wouldn't surprise me if a '15 will cost $5000 to $8000 more than a comparably equipped '14 when these factors are accounted for.
I recognize that a lot of people will love the '15 and sales should be plentiful. I also know that a lot of people will scramble to get a '14 before they're all gone, though. I order all of the new cars for the dealership I work for and I'm going to order as many '14's as I can for the balance of production.
All in all, I think the '15 Mustang GT is a great looking car. It just isn't a great looking Mustang, IMO. I love my '14 more and more every time I look at a '15.
Last edited by Five Oh Brian; 12/10/13 at 11:12 AM.
#96
Legacy TMS Member
Thank you. People are taught that SRA is a bad word and most haven't even pushed the car to the point where the differences between the two would make themselves apparent. I come from the handling first, power second world - couple of 300+hp MR2s, S2000...etc and I was won over by the 14's handling (well, not stock, but I saw the potential).
I think Moustang's heart is in the right place, but he doesn't really understand how the later Mustang's rear suspension works. My former Sr Manager and friend gets an SVT every 10 years. He currently has a 94 and 04 which have been set up properly and regularly whip prepped Porsches and others around big and little Willow. His SRAs aren't holding him back and he is several chassis revisions behind where we are. And guess what - Miatas still whip everyone else's butts around the twisties and it's just a fact.
In the real world, the only benefit a IRS will give you is a quieter ride at an equivalent performance level. There will be no UCA/LCAs, PBs, etc to transmit noise into the cabin. Now, I would take IRS over SRA any day of the week, but as it stands, the 10-14s are fun an very capable cars.
I'm going to enjoy mine for 4-5 years, then will pick up a new one later. Every time I turn the key, my ears and body are treated to the rumble of the V8. Every time I stab the gas, I am pulled back into my seat and I wonder how the car is maintaining a straight line and is failing to get lift! The Coyote Mustang will ALWAYS scratch the muscle/sports car itch if set up right - and it only takes a few hundred dollars. The stock GT was just behind the same MY M3 under track conditions and that speaks volumes; M3s are beasts. This new S550 will def be a game changer in EU where the M3s live. At the end of the day a better driver than I can wring better numbers out of a stock GT than I can in my prepped GT TP, so what's at stake now other than my ego?
#97
I should be surprised how many people are still trying to argue that a SRA is the right choice for this car, knowing that less than 5% of them (probably more like 1%) ever truly get drag raced hard, regularly. That's the ONLY place where it is better. Yes, it can work on a road course and yes, it can be ok on the street. There's a reason Mustang is the last car in America with an SRA and the last ones prior were the Panther cars. If an SRA was better, I'd expect the new BMW M4 coming out this week to have one. Guessing it'll have a fantastic IRS setup though, like every other modern street performance and race car. Sorry SRA guys. That's reality.
I just hope the Mustang stays affordable priced for us average blue color folks.
Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; 12/10/13 at 12:45 PM.
#98
Legacy TMS Member
BMW's are known for cornering so IRS is great. This is a mustang, it not meant to be a corning beast. Its design was to be a straight line pony, muscle car like vehicle. If you want a great handling car to corner on a dime go purchase a Corvette, Mazda Miata , BMW , 370Z. Lol. JK. I just hope the Mustang stays affordable priced for us average blue color folks.
#99
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
No idea. It all comes down to supply and demand. If the '14's stop selling, then rebates will go up. If '14's keep selling just fine, then Ford will hold the line on rebates. If sales get better for any reason, then rebates may go down. The current rebates run through January 2nd, so it'll be interesting to see what rebates do on January 3rd.
#100
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
You should spend some time on some of the enthusiast Mustang websites. Most forum members here don't seem like the racing type (drag racing or otherwise). Quite a few Mustang owners drag race. Our two local tracks (Pacific Raceways & Bremerton Raceway) are full of Mustangs on drag days. Not so much on open track days for road racing or autocrossing. I would venture to guess that for every one Mustang being road raced, there are ten or more hitting the drag strip.