2010 Ford Taurus SHO gets measured against the original
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer





Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
2010 Ford Taurus SHO gets measured against the original
So there's no arguing that the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO is a good performance bargain, but does it deserve those three all-important letters at the end of its name? The tough answer – especially for this self-described SHO fanatic – is no. The problem is that the superlative EcoBoost V6 is also offered in the Lincoln MKS EcoBoost, MKT EcoBoost and Ford Flex EcoBoost (though all three are down 10 hp compared to the SHO), so what we really have here is the 2010 Ford Taurus EcoBoost.
I think a Fusion SHO would be more the spiritual successor to the original Taurus SHO.
The new Taurus SHO checks all the possible "gotta have" boxes but just doesn't have the panache and soul of the original, regardless how "good" it is in strict objective numbers. It seems a car obsessed with doing no wrong rather than one trying to do something truly special -- more the child of product planners and marketeers than of the engineers that seemed to give birth to the original.
Besides, peeking under the hood is about as rewarding as peeking at the rubber mat under your dish drying rack whereas the original SHO's engine bay was an enthusiast's temple to speed.
The new Taurus SHO checks all the possible "gotta have" boxes but just doesn't have the panache and soul of the original, regardless how "good" it is in strict objective numbers. It seems a car obsessed with doing no wrong rather than one trying to do something truly special -- more the child of product planners and marketeers than of the engineers that seemed to give birth to the original.
Besides, peeking under the hood is about as rewarding as peeking at the rubber mat under your dish drying rack whereas the original SHO's engine bay was an enthusiast's temple to speed.
Last edited by rhumb; Sep 15, 2009 at 04:31 PM.
I think a Fusion SHO would be more the spiritual successor to the original Taurus SHO.
The new Taurus SHO checks all the possible "gotta have" boxes but just doesn't have the panache and soul of the original, regardless how "good" it is in strict objective numbers. It seems a car obsessed with doing no wrong rather than one trying to do something truly special -- more the child of product planners and marketeers than of the engineers that seemed to give birth to the original.
Besides, peeking under the hood is about as rewarding as peeking at the rubber mat under your dish drying rack whereas the original SHO's engine bay was an enthusiast's temple to speed.
The new Taurus SHO checks all the possible "gotta have" boxes but just doesn't have the panache and soul of the original, regardless how "good" it is in strict objective numbers. It seems a car obsessed with doing no wrong rather than one trying to do something truly special -- more the child of product planners and marketeers than of the engineers that seemed to give birth to the original.
Besides, peeking under the hood is about as rewarding as peeking at the rubber mat under your dish drying rack whereas the original SHO's engine bay was an enthusiast's temple to speed.
In fact, we might even have forgiven that Taurus SHO for the bland engine compartment treatment.
A lot of people forget that the first couple years of SHO weren't all that great either. Sure, the engine and the idea were there, but the 1989 SHO isn't the one in Neff's garage. The SHO really hit its stride with the '91 SHO Plus, that's the one people are remember fondly. For a first effort, this new SHO is pretty effing amazing and I look forward to where they take it with regular updating.
Except this isn't a first effort at making a Taurus SHO, Ford's been at it, off and on, since 1989.
That said, I think the first Gen and Gen 1.5 were the best effort and most iconic. They tried to make the second Gen "better" by simply adding more, but it ended up missing the whole point and spirit that was at the heart of the original SHO, even if it was objectively better in content and numbers.
I think this latest SHO rendition is closer to the V8 second gen than the iconic first, a very fine car that does nothing wrong but just doesn't have the passion and spirit of the original.
That said, I think the first Gen and Gen 1.5 were the best effort and most iconic. They tried to make the second Gen "better" by simply adding more, but it ended up missing the whole point and spirit that was at the heart of the original SHO, even if it was objectively better in content and numbers.
I think this latest SHO rendition is closer to the V8 second gen than the iconic first, a very fine car that does nothing wrong but just doesn't have the passion and spirit of the original.
Last edited by rhumb; Sep 16, 2009 at 05:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DerekShiekhi
GT350
2
Jul 24, 2015 05:58 AM



