Curb Weight
#3
87-93=2,725-3,350 depending on body style and engines. (notchback, hatchback, convertible, 4 cylinder, V8)
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)
If you have something specific in mind, let me know.
These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)
If you have something specific in mind, let me know.
These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
#4
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 11, 2005, 4:20 PM
87-93=2,725-3,350 depending on body style and engines. (notchback, hatchback, convertible, 4 cylinder, V8)
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)
If you have something specific in mind, let me know.
These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
87-93=2,725-3,350 depending on body style and engines. (notchback, hatchback, convertible, 4 cylinder, V8)
94-95=3,050-3,370 depending on body style and engines. (coupe,convertible, V6, V8)
If you have something specific in mind, let me know.
These figures came from a Certified Ford brochure.
So:
87-93 V8 Hatchback
94-95 V8 Coupe
Thanks!
#5
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
#6
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 12, 2005, 1:06 PM
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
Nah, it really helps out because I always hear how light the foxes are, but needed some numbers. Currently I'm in the market for a 94-95 Stang.
#7
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 12, 2005, 2:06 PM
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
87 V8: Hatchback 3,058; Notchback 3,000
88 V8: Hatchback 3,193
89 V8: Hatchback 3,194
90 V8: Hatchback 2,715; Notchback 2,715
91 V8: Hatchback 3,102; GT Hatchback 3,191; Coupe 3,037
92 V8: Hatchback 3,069; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,010
93 V8: Hatchback 3,096; GT Hatchback 3,144; Coupe 3,035
94 V8: Coupe 3,258; Cobra 3,365
95 V8: Coupe 3,280; GTS 3,246; Cobra 3,354
Probably way more than you wanted to know.
#9
Originally posted by bigred0383@July 13, 2005, 9:55 PM
No idea. Those were just the figures they had.
No idea. Those were just the figures they had.
#10
I got all the numbers from those nifty 1999 35th anniversary collector's cards, believe it or not. For each model year they engine choices with horsepower ratings; all bodystyle choices, what they weighed, and the cost of them when new; chassis info; and production totals.
#11
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by 428CJ@July 13, 2005, 9:15 PM
Do you know whly the 90 V8 weighed 400lbs lighter? That is really strange. And who would, (back when those cars were brand new) buy a 91 when it was obviously a lot slower than the 90?
Do you know whly the 90 V8 weighed 400lbs lighter? That is really strange. And who would, (back when those cars were brand new) buy a 91 when it was obviously a lot slower than the 90?
Anywhosit, something doesn't sit right? There shouldn't be a drastic weight difference for 1 model year considering that the cars were essentially unchanged in general configuration since 1987.
If that were the case the 1990 model year 5.0s would have been the fastest production cars for that generation. I dont remeber any articles detailing mid to low 13 second fox body cars?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
Fred_Garvin
2010-2014 Mustang
4
9/17/15 04:10 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM