PlayMisty

For the record...
2500km, manual 07 GT, 279.66 PS, 397.61 Nm.
Bone stock

shahzadmasih

Hi, this post is very informative; however I would like some specific information. If someone can help me then please send me a private message. Best Regards,

The Dark Horse

Baseline run: '06 Mustang GT convertible, stock except for Hurst shifter.

SAE corrected: 273 hp, 299 ft-lbs. That was about 8 hp more than I expected from the stock motor.

Next up: JLT CAI w/Bamachips tune.

AFBLUE

Good #s.

Other TMS member manual 5-speed, dynojet dynoed, stock GT #s for comparison.
RWHP RWTQ
272 288
270
273 296
271 295
273 295
275 291
276 293
263 286
267 290
266 280

AFBLUE

Last winter (dec 05-Jan 06), I had built a spreadsheet with dyno #s from this thread. I just finished updating it and added some more info from other TMS threads. Not all incompassing, but it is a handy tool for looking at:
1. Various stock dyno #s (including averages)
2. Seeing the dyno changes for a TMS member as they add more mods
3. Seeing how various mods effect the dyno #s.
4. Worksheet labeled "superchargers" has #s and sources for various mustang superchargers.
5. Click on a members' name to go the the source of the info.

Note that you can filter the selections on the top line. For example, on the 1st worksheet, if you just want to see all the 4.6L, manual, stocks, on a dynojet, you just select those options.

I'll also post this in another thread so that it has more visibility.

The Dark Horse

AFBlue that's some impressive work!!! It's exactly the sort of thing I would do.


The only thing that bothers me is that some people may be posting raw numbers or STD corrected numbers instead of SAE corrected numbers (here's one example).


The printout I got from my baseline run said I was making 281 hp/308 tq. I nearly jumped over the counter and kissed the guy until I realized he'd printed out uncorrected numbers.

AFBLUE

Yeah, I didn't religiously do it, but when I saw someone post "SAE corrected", I tried to put it in the notes column. Also checking the associated link sometimes will tell you whether it was SAE corrected.

hags1

Current dyno numbers:

Dynojet (SAE 5) 300.26 RWHP / 315.67 RWTQ

Current mods:

Bassani X-Pipe w/ Comp. Cats.
Bassani Axle Back Mufflers
LFP Twin Blade 62mm TB
WMS 95mm High Velocity Intake w/ Ram Air Tray
Meziere Electric Water Pump
Steeda UPDs
Moto Blue Gen. II 90mm Idler Pullies

hags1

flapjack

I'm impressed! That is quite a nice spreadsheet, and very handy for comparing numbers.

I'm in the top 20 for HP. Not bad for a V6. Wait until Rygen gets his DynoJet numbers, though..... I think we'll all be floored.

Rondosa

Guess I've never really posted here.

2006 GT manual. Steeda CAI. SCT II w/tune from Steeda.ca. JBA Axle back. 289.1hp, 285.2tq. Mustang Dyno. Nice warm day, not too hot, not too cold.

dkegel

294hp/304tq. SAE Dynojet numbers

'06 manual, C&L street intake, Evolution 93 octane tune, CMCV deletes, Steeda UDPs, Magnaflow axle backs

Dave Kegel

mustangfan123

I got 293rwhp/313rwtq. STD DynoJet Numbers

-'07 manual, C&L Racer, Custom 93 Octane Dynotune, 3:73's(makes it read lower), Steeda CMDP's, Motoblue UDP's, Flowmaster Axlebacks

dkegel

Cool. Very similar mods (I have 4.10s). Do the gears really make it read lower? Why is that?

Any chance you have your corrected numbers? It's very difficult to compare uncorrected numbers because of the weather differences. They would be much lower if done when it's 80 degrees vs, say, 50.

Dave

mustangfan123

My car was dynoed in high humidity, pretty hot weather. Is there any way you can calculate SAE numbers?

Also,I think the gears make it lower since the engine is using more hp to mantain the several hundred higher rpm's that the gears cause.

dkegel

The dyno calculates both uncorrected and SAE corrected numbers. I only have the graph and "spreadsheet" SAE numbers, I didn't ask for the non-corrected numbers. I'm surprised you have the uncorrected nnumbers, that seems odd that your dyno guy would give you those. There's no way (as far a I know) to extrapolate one type from the other. It's based on temp, humidty, and baro pressure.

Dave

The Dark Horse

Mine did the same thing. I think they do that because you get bigger numbers (and happier customers).

There sure is. It’s the SAE J1349 JUN90 standard. There's a formula here you can work with: http://wahiduddin.net/calc/cf.htm Although, strangely, it does not include humidity.

-Scott

Lowe!

New dyno #s. I haven't scanned the sheet yet.
Mustang Dyno
Temp: ~90*
humidity: ~60%
VERY rich tune, <= 11:1

But anyway:
311 rwhp
330 rwtq

Mods:
C&L Racer CAI
Steeda UDPs
Steeda CMCV DPs
ARH LT headers, catted H-pipe
93 oct Race tune from TillmanSpeed

I leaned it out a couple of times b/t runs and gained 6rwhp and 7rwtq, so there some more playing w/ A/F ratio to do there. A/F was still below 12:1

dkegel

Well, you'll get higher uncorrected numbers if it's cold outside, but lower numbers if it's hot out. Right?

Thanks, I'll take a look.

Dave

Lowe!

I finally scaned the sheets. Turns out my max tq was a little higher than I originally posted above:


Here was the first run. The A/F is actually a point lower than shown on these graphs, so it's mostly under 11:1 from 3500rpm on up, with a dip to almost 9:1 at then end.

Granatelli

http://www.powertvonline.com/video_detail.php?mId=383