2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Is this true? 2007 Mustang GT Slower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/15/07, 09:58 AM
  #41  
Legacy TMS Member
 
metroplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 4,778
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
The 07s have a different coolant hose routing (upper hose runs from the passenger side of the radiator to the driver side of the intake manifold).
Old 4/15/07, 10:43 AM
  #42  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wonder why they changed it. Was there a problem with the 05-06 setup?
Old 4/15/07, 06:24 PM
  #43  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
karman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,907
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by AFBLUE
I wonder why they changed it. Was there a problem with the 05-06 setup?
That's something I wondered about as soon as I saw the '07.
Does anybody have an answer?
Old 4/15/07, 07:09 PM
  #44  
Legacy TMS Member
 
metroplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 4,778
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
I heard the old hose routing caused some problems with changing the engine oil filter?

Another guess is coolant cavitation or NVH. A longer hose routing might slow down the coolant enough so that it doesn't cause any vibrations.
Old 4/15/07, 07:18 PM
  #45  
Team Mustang Source
 
theedge67's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2006
Location: St. Louis Area
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm sure Ford did not redesign anything to make the oil filter easier to change. It is already a piece of cake on my '06, don't know how it could be any easier.

I wish some other manufacturers (ahem, *cough*, Saturn, *cough*) would redesign some stuff to make it easier to get to the filters. I spent longer changing the oil on the girls saturn than I did changing the front brake pads. Ridiculous.
Old 4/15/07, 11:09 PM
  #46  
Team Mustang Source
 
hiznherponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2004
Location: Beautiful New Hampshire!!!
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, it was redesigned so that it was easier to install at the plant, and has less parts, to save money.
Old 4/16/07, 03:06 AM
  #47  
Legacy TMS Member
 
metroplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 4,778
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Thanks Hiznherponies.

Ford generally makes the modular engines very easy to maintain and remove compared to the older 302s. Changing the t-stat in my 302 was an ordeal compared to the 4.6 (2V/3V).

If anything, the hoses on the 05-06 GT looked very short compared to the 07 (at least the upper hose).
Old 4/16/07, 12:16 PM
  #48  
Bullitt Member
 
mvon919's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my car is faster than many 05-06 models... and even faster than some 07s

who cares. stock mustang is slow.
Old 4/16/07, 12:18 PM
  #49  
Bullitt Member
 
mvon919's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by metroplex
Thanks Hiznherponies.

Ford generally makes the modular engines very easy to maintain and remove compared to the older 302s. Changing the t-stat in my 302 was an ordeal compared to the 4.6 (2V/3V).

If anything, the hoses on the 05-06 GT looked very short compared to the 07 (at least the upper hose).
07 has upgraded thermostat housing in water cross-over... it's not hanging in air like 05-06 model. though it needs to be modified to 05-06 when adding supercharger. s/C cross-overs don't have place for thermosttat.
Old 4/17/07, 10:29 AM
  #50  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mvon919
who cares. stock mustang is slow.
Compared to what, exactly? A Ferrari?

0 to 60 in five seconds is hardly "slow."
Old 4/17/07, 10:50 AM
  #51  
Mach 1 Member
 
n00bstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 7, 2006
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
Compared to what, exactly? A Ferrari?

0 to 60 in five seconds is hardly "slow."
haha don't get offended.
he's just saying that there's no point in debating
stock mustangs because in the end they're all slow
compared to a modded mustang.

and the fact that the 07's are slower kind of sucks.
but it's ok since i don't race.
Old 4/17/07, 10:51 AM
  #52  
Legacy TMS Member
 
metroplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 4,778
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
A fully optioned 07 GT/CS versus a well-seasoned 05 GT isn't a fair test.
Old 4/17/07, 01:10 PM
  #53  
Team Mustang Source
 
kevinb120's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I still don't understand the logic thinking that an 07 is slower
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scothew
Curated Content Articles 2005-2009 Youtube & Photo Gallery
4
8/14/23 03:37 PM
Buffet Slayer
Tungsten Grey
2
7/29/17 01:32 PM
Sacmus
1964-1970 Mustang
1
7/22/15 02:59 AM
Detroit Steel
General Mustang Chat
2
7/7/15 03:16 PM



Quick Reply: Is this true? 2007 Mustang GT Slower?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 AM.