Building the camaro
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Were I to be a Camaro fan I'd be very pleased with all except the possible production date. Three years is a very long time.
It's classy, modern, and muscular. In my book it would be a winner just like the Challenger. The only problem is the obnoxious Camaro lovers would be a lot worse than they are now. Heaven help us.
It's classy, modern, and muscular. In my book it would be a winner just like the Challenger. The only problem is the obnoxious Camaro lovers would be a lot worse than they are now. Heaven help us.
Cam Tease
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
It didn't take much growing for me, that thing looks vicious. I think its the lack of dorky round headlights that makes it more appealing than the Stang to me--though it doesnt look quite as good as the GT-R.
GTR Member
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@January 14, 2006, 1:00 AM
The only problem is the obnoxious Camaro lovers would be a lot worse than they are now. Heaven help us.
The only problem is the obnoxious Camaro lovers would be a lot worse than they are now. Heaven help us.
as for the Camaro, i hate it, it looks like a saturn
V6 Member
Joined: January 15, 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
It's starting to look like the "war of muscle cars" that roamed the land in the late '60s. Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers.....there just won't be as many options as there was back then. No 442s and Roadrunners nor 'Cuda's. Let the games begin!!
Cobra Member
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
If the Challenger makes it to production, I fully expect a Barracuda and 'cuda to follow. They may call it a Chrysler or a Dodge or even a Dodge Challenger 'cuda, but if the market holds up, it'll happen.
Not so sure on the Roadrunner, as that would have to be on the Charger platform, and don't know that they'd go that far. Then again, they did a "Super Bee"-ish pickup truck so who knows.
Not so sure on the Roadrunner, as that would have to be on the Charger platform, and don't know that they'd go that far. Then again, they did a "Super Bee"-ish pickup truck so who knows.
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
The interior's overdone but not bad, and everything between the A-pillar and the base of the rear glass looks ok, but not amazingly good like the Mustang concepts were. The front and tail look like derivative crapola
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Originally posted by mrGT@January 19, 2006, 2:10 AM
It's starting to look like the "war of muscle cars" that roamed the land in the late '60s. Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers.....there just won't be as many options as there was back then. No 442s and Roadrunners nor 'Cuda's. Let the games begin!!
It's starting to look like the "war of muscle cars" that roamed the land in the late '60s. Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers.....there just won't be as many options as there was back then. No 442s and Roadrunners nor 'Cuda's. Let the games begin!!
Mach 1 Member
Joined: November 13, 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
...wow...untill i saw the shot of the concept next to the '69 i couldn't see a great resemblance in the concept...now i can see it come out...and somehow it looks better now...
anyhow...i wouldn't want it
anyhow...i wouldn't want it
FR500 Member
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Looking at the buildup photos, I figured out why I don't really care for the front or rear end of the Camaro concept. The front end reminds me of an 80's Monte Carlo SS - I liked the later model year LS headlights better - and the front is too "pointy", in my opinion. As for the tail lights, maybe if they were turned upside down they'd look better? Or go for a more single lens, rectangular look? Must've been just as hard to copy Ford now as it was back then.