1971-1973 Mustang Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

“Muscle Car of the Week” Zeroes In on ’71 Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 09:05 AM
  #1  
Detroit Steel's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Staff
 
Joined: April 24, 2014
Posts: 295
Likes: 13
“Muscle Car of the Week” Zeroes In on ’71 Mustang



Depending on your view, the 1971 Mustang is either iconic or one of those huge misses that some would like to forget. Either way, it's hard to ignore this 429 Super Cobra Jet Mach 1.

Read the rest on the Mustang Source homepage. >>

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; Sep 8, 2023 at 03:07 PM. Reason: Moved To 1971-73 Forums
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 11:26 AM
  #2  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
Depending on your view, the 1971 Mustang is either iconic or one of those huge misses that some would like to forget.

At the time, the design was intended to appeal to more mature Mustang buyers with families. It was a drastic departure from previous models, with a long hood and odd roofline extending down into the decklid.

It was definitely a Mustang that required certain taste from a buyer. And to date, it remains one of the oddest designs in the 50 years of the Ford pony car.

However, regardless of what you think about the car, there’s no questioning the fact that it is an important part of Mustang’s history. And when it’s one like the 429 Super Cobra Jet Mach 1 featured in the Muscle Car of the Week video below, it’s hard to ignore the appeal.

That said, we’re not necessarily saying that the video (hosted by the ever-informed Kevin Oeste) will change your opinion of the car, if you aren’t a fan of the car already.

Reply
Old Dec 1, 2015 | 07:40 AM
  #3  
Paris MkVI's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 18, 2004
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 142
From: Virginia
Ford's decision to build a bigger Mustang was a marketing-driven decision. But so are most such decisions in the business, so I cannot fault them for that.

I know these 71-73 bodies are not as popular amongst Mustang fans, but I have no objection to them. I look at it this way; some folks tend to think the Mustang II design was one of the weakest cars in the Mustang lineage, with the 71-73 models being the second-weakest.

But if it wasn't for the 71-73 cars and the 74-78 cars, we would have never made it to the Fox body '79 (with a thrilling 157hp V8).

If it wasn't for these cars, the Mustang nameplate could have faded away into motor history, not to be seen again. And we wouldn't be enjoying the Mustangs we have today.

Last edited by Paris MkVI; Dec 1, 2015 at 07:41 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2015 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
Dr. Frankenstang's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Port Charlotte, Florida
'71 Mustang? I thought that was the new Camaro!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
MustangMyWay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 14, 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
From: Roseville, MI
These cars are not as big as some people seem to think:
Attached Thumbnails -image2.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 10:50 PM
  #6  
shaneyusa's Avatar
2014 SGM Roush Stage 2 --------- Moderator------
 
Joined: July 7, 2013
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 1,332
From: Idaho
Wow, that shot kinda puts it in perspective...

Did not realize how big the S197 are or how small the 71-73 are.

Last edited by shaneyusa; Mar 17, 2016 at 10:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2016 | 05:01 AM
  #7  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Originally Posted by MustangMyWay
These cars are not as big as some people seem to think:
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2016 | 10:18 AM
  #8  
MustangMyWay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 14, 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
From: Roseville, MI
S197 Mustang
Wheelbase: 107.1 in (2,720 mm)
Length: 187.6 in (4,770 mm)
Width: 73.8 in (1,870 mm)
Height: 54.5 in (1,380 mm)
Curb weight:
V8 coupe MT/AT: 3,480 lb/3,525 lb
V8 convertible MT/AT: 3,610 lb/3,655 lb
GT500 coupe: 3,950 lb
GT500 convertible: 4,040 lb



1973 Mustang
Wheel Base: 109"
Length: 193.8"
Width: 74.1"
Height: 50.1"
Weight: 3560 lbs. (351CJ)

Last edited by MustangMyWay; Mar 18, 2016 at 10:26 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2016 | 11:11 AM
  #9  
MustangMyWay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 14, 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
From: Roseville, MI
The 1973 V8 is six inches longer than the S197 but that was partially because of the new "five mile per hour" bumper they added that year which added about four inches.
The previous two years of the same body style the length was 189.51" -only less that two inches longer than the S197.
The other dimensions are actually smaller and the weight eighty pounds heavier that the base V8 S197. With the smaller V8 (302) the '73 weighs less than the base V8 S197.

In short, the 1,2,3's my be the longest by a bit but it is certainly not the biggest.

Last edited by MustangMyWay; Mar 18, 2016 at 11:28 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2023 | 12:53 PM
  #10  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 4,278
From: Visalia Ca.
Just Stumbled on this Old Post!

Post 5 Blew My Mind!

Mgb,

KC
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2023 | 08:20 AM
  #11  
shaneyusa's Avatar
2014 SGM Roush Stage 2 --------- Moderator------
 
Joined: July 7, 2013
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 1,332
From: Idaho
Yup, me too. I always thought 71-73 were very large, not so much.

Here is our S197s vs the other early models as well...




Reply
Old Aug 31, 2023 | 08:41 AM
  #12  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 4,278
From: Visalia Ca.
Great Perspective Shots!

Mgb,

KC
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 02:39 PM
  #13  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 2,509
From: Carnegie, PA
From a visual point of view, the 71-73 models only appear to look much larger over the S197 models, but when placed together, side by side, is when the size differences between them fully reveal themselves as being nearly identical... For myself personally, I would have much preferred if Ford had retained the overall size dimensions of the previous SN-95/New Edge generation when they designed the S197 models, but I can certainly understand that due to meeting updated safety regulation requirements, along with advancements in safety component technology that Ford had no other option, but to increase the overall size for the S197 design platform...

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; Sep 8, 2023 at 02:41 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Detroit Steel
1964-1970 Mustang
1
Sep 12, 2016 07:13 AM
Detroit Steel
General Mustang Chat
4
Sep 21, 2015 03:35 PM
Detroit Steel
Fox Mustangs
5
Mar 4, 2015 09:53 AM
JonathonK
General Mustang Chat
1
Sep 26, 2014 03:59 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.