2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

I need new rear brake pads already...??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #41  
FordService's Avatar
NOT CURRENTLY ACTIVE ON THIS SITE! DO NOT USE PM FEATURE!
 
Joined: October 25, 2010
Posts: 5,279
Likes: 16
From: Dearborn, MI
Originally Posted by DrFrag
I will definitely do this, thank you!
Awesome, DrFrag!

Deysha
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:31 PM
  #42  
Mustangfreak's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 29, 2004
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
From: Spangdahlem AB Germany/ Home is Ft Worth
Originally Posted by DrFrag
It was at a major Ford dealer in the southern california area. I would never take my car to a jiffy lube or similar.

Additionally, I just got off the phone with them and they said the warranty is 12 months or 18k miles, whichever is first. the car is 14 months old so no dice on the warranty

Time to check them your self then
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2012 | 01:06 PM
  #43  
DrFrag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Sherman Oaks, CA
Just thought I'd give everyone an update.

The tech that initially did the work on my car "misdiagnosed" the rear brakes. After a trip to the dealer to get them replaced, turns out they are a perfectly acceptable level for the mileage (between 5 and 6MM).

So I went in, they looked at the brakes, said everything was fine, and I drove off without paying anything. For my troubles (the service manager felt bad, as he should), my next oil change with them is going to be free.

Also, Deysha did follow through with having a rep contact me. Fortunately though everything was just a big misunderstanding, and nothing is actually wrong with my car. A lot of hooplah about nothing, really, but that's better than there actually being something wrong with my car.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #44  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
thats good news
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2012 | 04:38 PM
  #45  
stupidgenius36's Avatar
Just Plain Rude!
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 18
From: Denton, TX
Nothin' like a good ol' misunderstanding to fuel a discussion.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 08:31 AM
  #46  
FordService's Avatar
NOT CURRENTLY ACTIVE ON THIS SITE! DO NOT USE PM FEATURE!
 
Joined: October 25, 2010
Posts: 5,279
Likes: 16
From: Dearborn, MI
Originally Posted by DrFrag
Just thought I'd give everyone an update.
The tech that initially did the work on my car "misdiagnosed" the rear brakes. After a trip to the dealer to get them replaced, turns out they are a perfectly acceptable level for the mileage (between 5 and 6MM).
So I went in, they looked at the brakes, said everything was fine, and I drove off without paying anything. For my troubles (the service manager felt bad, as he should), my next oil change with them is going to be free.
Also, Deysha did follow through with having a rep contact me. Fortunately though everything was just a big misunderstanding, and nothing is actually wrong with my car. A lot of hooplah about nothing, really, but that's better than there actually being something wrong with my car.
Thank you for the update, DrFrag. Great to know all is good!

Deysha
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 03:01 PM
  #47  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by HizliBullet
Reason why rears eat faster than fronts is because not to jerk/push the passengers forward during braking, my Mazda is same and that's what the service advisor said..think about it if the majority of braking was done in the front, everytime u hit the brakes ud feel a lot more momentum that pushes your body forward
Late getting back to this but my traction control light generally doesn't go off during braking.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 11:33 AM
  #48  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
I know the OP has resolved his issue, but I wanted to jump in and get some clarification on the parking brake possibility. In cars equipped with drum brakes in the rear these are used for the parking brake. However, I have been told disc brakes make awful parking brakes so cars with 4 wheel disc brakes require a separate system for the parking brake.

http://cars.about.com/od/thingsyoune...discvsdrum.htm
(Drum brakes are less expensive to make than disc brakes, largely because they can also double as a parking brake, whereas disc brakes require a separate parking brake mechanism.)

The referenced link isn't where I originally saw this but it is something I have seen more than once, from sources that I would generally trust to be accurate with this type of thing.

Can anyone confirm that the disc brakes on the Mustang are actually used for the parking brake as well?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #49  
Moustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2012
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 13
From: Suburbs of Dallas
Originally Posted by AWmustang
I know the OP has resolved his issue, but I wanted to jump in and get some clarification on the parking brake possibility. In cars equipped with drum brakes in the rear these are used for the parking brake. However, I have been told disc brakes make awful parking brakes so cars with 4 wheel disc brakes require a separate system for the parking brake.

http://cars.about.com/od/thingsyoune...discvsdrum.htm
(Drum brakes are less expensive to make than disc brakes, largely because they can also double as a parking brake, whereas disc brakes require a separate parking brake mechanism.)

The referenced link isn't where I originally saw this but it is something I have seen more than once, from sources that I would generally trust to be accurate with this type of thing.

Can anyone confirm that the disc brakes on the Mustang are actually used for the parking brake as well?
Cars with disc brakes do require a separate mechanism to apply the brakes.

Drum brakes work off springs and mechanical linkages. All a parking brake does on a car with drum brakes is applies tension to the linkages and the brakes are applied.

Disc brakes are hydraulically controlled though, and hydraulic pressure is lost once the engine is turned off. Thus, there is a separate line with a mechanical link that either applies pressure to the normal brake pads, or actually has a smaller separate drum-style brake on the inside of the brake disc which is used as the parking brake.

I'm not exactly positive which style the Mustang uses, but I suspect it's applying pressure to the normal brake pads.

Last edited by Moustang; Aug 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #50  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
I also required rears before fronts and also pretty early. No brake stands, no aggressive braking. Spirited but controlled driving only. Since I had them apart I replaced both with ceramics. A way less messy (brake dust). I also don't understand why rears would go first, but hasn't been a problem since the replacement.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 05:45 AM
  #51  
2012GTCS's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2011
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
How many miles Until you had to replace them?

Something is wrong With my ebrake, the car squeaks like crazy sometimes. I narrowed it down that it squeaks more when ebrake is clicked once. And goes away at 3 clicks (while driving). Odd part is, when I put my stock wheels on, it goes away. Hmm
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 11:53 AM
  #52  
M3hunter's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2010
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Unhappy

Yesterday they changed my rear brakes including rotors. No brake standing, just regular driving, some quick corners. Car with only 20k miles, front brembos fine.
I suspect that the front brembos have higher life because of their quality and maybe the rears working under TC under curves, even that normally I drive in sport mode is the reason. I really did not see any scratch or noticed any abnormal wear on the rear rotors, but either way they replaced them.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #53  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Moustang
Cars with disc brakes do require a separate mechanism to apply the brakes.

Drum brakes work off springs and mechanical linkages. All a parking brake does on a car with drum brakes is applies tension to the linkages and the brakes are applied.

Disc brakes are hydraulically controlled though, and hydraulic pressure is lost once the engine is turned off. Thus, there is a separate line with a mechanical link that either applies pressure to the normal brake pads, or actually has a smaller separate drum-style brake on the inside of the brake disc which is used as the parking brake.

I'm not exactly positive which style the Mustang uses, but I suspect it's applying pressure to the normal brake pads.
IIRC, my old 70's Toyota Land Cruiser FJ40's had a drum brake setup on the driveshaft.

The 08 Mustang Service Manual says the parking brake pulls on cables to the rear 'brake caliper parking brake actuators' that (mechanically) apply the rear brake pads. The parking brake lever can be out of adjustment, or the cables may be rusted or binding, or the brake caliper guide pins may be binding, causing excessive wear on the rear brake pads.

Last edited by cdynaco; Mar 2, 2014 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joemad59
GT
6
Dec 30, 2015 06:13 PM
Fords4Ever
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
9
Oct 30, 2015 09:07 PM
5.M0NSTER
2010-2014 Mustang
17
Sep 16, 2015 08:00 AM
1001yos
Ford Discussions
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:05 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.