2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
10/28/13, 02:07 PM
#4343
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 27, 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10/28/13, 06:11 PM
#4344
Shelby GT500 Member
10/28/13, 06:26 PM
#4345
If it's in a magazine the Camaro will be better even if it's heavier, slower, and fuglier.
Last edited by 2k7gtcs; 10/28/13 at 06:30 PM.
10/29/13, 08:43 PM
#4348
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10/29/13, 08:53 PM
#4349
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know there are some haters of the fox, but without it, the Mustang would be a Probe.
Everybody has there preferred flavor of the Mustang, but IMO, the ones that were truly ugly were the 71-73 with truly badonkadonk rears. Even the 74-78's looked better. I just can't get past (or see around) the @ss. Lol The fox is what kept Ford in the pony car business. The SN95, mainly new edges is what killed the competition. 05-09's brought back some of the classic look and it worked in bringing back the competition. But again IMO, they should have redesigned for 2010, instead of totally redesigning for 2015, which could be a disaster given the importance of the anniversary. This could be a design were the vast majority of fans ignore the generation.
Everybody has there preferred flavor of the Mustang, but IMO, the ones that were truly ugly were the 71-73 with truly badonkadonk rears. Even the 74-78's looked better. I just can't get past (or see around) the @ss. Lol The fox is what kept Ford in the pony car business. The SN95, mainly new edges is what killed the competition. 05-09's brought back some of the classic look and it worked in bringing back the competition. But again IMO, they should have redesigned for 2010, instead of totally redesigning for 2015, which could be a disaster given the importance of the anniversary. This could be a design were the vast majority of fans ignore the generation.
Last edited by Mustango; 10/29/13 at 08:56 PM.
10/29/13, 09:26 PM
#4351
Bullitt Member
10/30/13, 06:21 AM
#4352
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I want a sports car why would I buy a Mustang?
I buy a Mustang because I want a sports coupe or muscle car.
Glad people at ford at least seem to know their market.
Last edited by Mustango; 10/30/13 at 06:25 AM.
10/30/13, 06:52 AM
#4354
Bullitt Member
Rolleyes all you want. This rendering looks just as easily like an Aston Martin or a Jag. I don't think you are in Ford's marketing eyes either. That is, unless you live in Europe.
10/30/13, 06:59 AM
#4355
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Second, I know it already looks like a Jag, reason I wrote it would look EVEN more like a Jag and Aston. ;-)
10/30/13, 07:04 AM
#4356
Bullitt Member
Yes, I do live in Europe for the time being, reason this design sickens me. It looks like any other coupe around here. Even Peugeot has something not too different. Second, I know it already looks like a Jag, reason I wrote it would look EVEN more like a Jag and Aston. ;-)
10/30/13, 08:18 AM
#4357
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10/30/13, 09:05 AM
#4358
Cobra R Member
While I'm Not a Fan of C&D's Render, it's Not Even Close to a Fusion Coupe. But Some People just Dont Get It that the Grill on the 2015 will look more like an Evolution of the 2013/2014 Mustang, which in it's self is an Evolution of the 67/68 Shelby's Grill. Not to mention that the proportions of the 2015 Mustang alone will make it look Nothing Like a Fusion. It's Dash to Axle Ratio Clearly Define it as a Rear Wheel Drive Car, and it will be Much Lower and Wider with a Much More Agressive Stance. Nobody will Mistake it for a Fusion.
10/30/13, 09:44 AM
#4359
FR500 Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
^]
+1
This doesnt look like a fusion coupe at all to me. Yea theres some similarities but its Ford company face now. Like it or not times and designs are changing. Also on the Monte Carlo comparo earlier, chu crazy. Proportions are way off and honestly theres no way i could ever confuse the two. Even if i was blind id be able o tell which is which. These arent even the official pics but if you dont like it you dont have to buy it
+1
This doesnt look like a fusion coupe at all to me. Yea theres some similarities but its Ford company face now. Like it or not times and designs are changing. Also on the Monte Carlo comparo earlier, chu crazy. Proportions are way off and honestly theres no way i could ever confuse the two. Even if i was blind id be able o tell which is which. These arent even the official pics but if you dont like it you dont have to buy it
10/30/13, 10:06 AM
#4360
Bullitt Member
^] +1 This doesnt look like a fusion coupe at all to me. Yea theres some similarities but its Ford company face now. Like it or not times and designs are changing. Also on the Monte Carlo comparo earlier, chu crazy. Proportions are way off and honestly theres no way i could ever confuse the two. Even if i was blind id be able o tell which is which. These arent even the official pics but if you dont like it you dont have to buy it
In my eyes, only a few changes and it would make a big difference. Smaller in length than the current stang. Loose the abrupt nose. Add a little more Mustang cues, so it looks meaner, not docile and like it will get 40 MPH.