Negative effects of a heavy wheel?
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Negative effects of a heavy wheel?
I have the american racing supersnake wheels, they look great but are heavy. Rear 20x10 is 36lbs, and front 20x9 is 34lbs. On the highway on a long cruise, I am now getting 5mpg less. How does it effect performance?
Is it worth the money going to light weight wheels.
Is it worth the money going to light weight wheels.
#2
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
It depends on how you use the car.
On a road course it means less acceleration out of the corner, and it makes things much harder on your brakes. Lighter wheels are better for racing, but again, depends on how you use the car.
I'm surprised to see you're loosing that much MPG. Are the tires high rolling resistance? Just the weight alone should not add up to 5pmg less.
On a road course it means less acceleration out of the corner, and it makes things much harder on your brakes. Lighter wheels are better for racing, but again, depends on how you use the car.
I'm surprised to see you're loosing that much MPG. Are the tires high rolling resistance? Just the weight alone should not add up to 5pmg less.
#5
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 27, 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
It's really not possible that a total increase of only around 40 pounds - whether sprung or unsprung - would cause that much difference in mileage. A wild guess would be that maybe the two sets of wheels/tires are different sizes (overall diameter not width)? Then the difference becomes a function of an inaccurate odometer because of the different number of wheel revolutions per mile... the actual gas mileage is about the same but the calculation is thrown off by the odometer difference.
#6
Mach 1 Member
Also, rolling resistance between one tire model and manufacturer and another can be significantly different causing noteable difference in fuel economy.
John
John
#8
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 25, 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,758
Received 1,496 Likes
on
1,020 Posts
#12
Also if your new tire has a larger contact patch with the road you have more friction with the ground. This will lead to a decrease in efficiency, so less MPG though it would take some truly massive tires to see that significant of a drop. Your spedo will be off as well if you didn't program the new tire size.
Not likely it's an issue of weight.
#13
Shelby GT350 Member
This. If you didn't tune the car for larger diameter tires, the car will think you are doing less miles than you really did and thus showing worse gas mileage.
Also if your new tire has a larger contact patch with the road you have more friction with the ground. This will lead to a decrease in efficiency, so less MPG though it would take some truly massive tires to see that significant of a drop. Your spedo will be off as well if you didn't program the new tire size.
Not likely it's an issue of weight.
Also if your new tire has a larger contact patch with the road you have more friction with the ground. This will lead to a decrease in efficiency, so less MPG though it would take some truly massive tires to see that significant of a drop. Your spedo will be off as well if you didn't program the new tire size.
Not likely it's an issue of weight.
#14
Shelby GT350 Member
Unsprung/rotating mass is often estimated to be 4x as significant as mass anywhere else on the car.
It requires more energy to accelerate which penalizes any time you change speeds (up or down) and because of the greater inertia of the suspension system, the suspension will react more slowly to bumps and surface imperfections which makes the ride rougher and handling poorer.
Light wheels are ALWAYS better (so long as they're strong enough to do the job )
It requires more energy to accelerate which penalizes any time you change speeds (up or down) and because of the greater inertia of the suspension system, the suspension will react more slowly to bumps and surface imperfections which makes the ride rougher and handling poorer.
Light wheels are ALWAYS better (so long as they're strong enough to do the job )
#15
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 27, 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Unsprung/rotating mass is often estimated to be 4x as significant as mass anywhere else on the car.
It requires more energy to accelerate which penalizes any time you change speeds (up or down) and because of the greater inertia of the suspension system, the suspension will react more slowly to bumps and surface imperfections which makes the ride rougher and handling poorer.
Light wheels are ALWAYS better (so long as they're strong enough to do the job )
It requires more energy to accelerate which penalizes any time you change speeds (up or down) and because of the greater inertia of the suspension system, the suspension will react more slowly to bumps and surface imperfections which makes the ride rougher and handling poorer.
Light wheels are ALWAYS better (so long as they're strong enough to do the job )
#16
Shelby GT350 Member
...But a relatively small difference in unsprung mass will have little effect on fuel mileage - certainly not 4 mpg (~17%). Even if each wheel/tire was 10 lbs heavier and your 4x figure is accurate, that would mean having a 160 lb passenger would also knock 17% off of the fuel mileage which we all know is nowhere near reality.
As others have guessed above, difference in the diameter (and therefore the mileage calculation) likely explains a lot of/most of what the OP is seeing.
#17
Shelby GT350 Member
Just don't run slicks on enkei pf01's - I've cracked two wheels now at the track
Back on subject, -5 mpg isn't from the wheels. Wider tires, different driving winter blend gas maybe.... Once you're at speed the weight of the wheel really makes no difference for highway mileage. Stop and go mileage would suffer a bit
Back on subject, -5 mpg isn't from the wheels. Wider tires, different driving winter blend gas maybe.... Once you're at speed the weight of the wheel really makes no difference for highway mileage. Stop and go mileage would suffer a bit
#18
Shelby GT350 Member
That said, how many of us actually change wheels and end up with a tire package that offers lower rolling resistance?
-5mpg would require an absurd amount of friction increase from wider/stickier tires but there's almost always some kind of measurable fuel consumption penalty with a tire upgrade.
#19
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
how do I tune the car to use the aftermarket wheels? I think that is mostly the issue as when I hand calculated it I was getting 27mpg on the hwy.
I really like my supersnake rims and do not want to have to replace them with another set, any ideas?
I really like my supersnake rims and do not want to have to replace them with another set, any ideas?
#20
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 25, 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,758
Received 1,496 Likes
on
1,020 Posts
But to answer your question: you need a hand held tuner; you go in to the tuner and "load custom tune" or whatever it is in that model of tuner; then before loading the tune, you go in to "adjust parameters" and select the correct "revolutions per mile" for the tires that you have on the rear wheels. The best place to get the "revolutions per mile" number is from the manufacturer's web site for the exact tires that you have, or from another source of the same information such as Tire Rack.
Or, not sure if maybe a dealer can do it for you?