Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

It's Dyno Time!

Old 11/20/14, 09:39 AM
  #1  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
It's Dyno Time!

Going to tune carb and put the beast on the dyno tomorrow. We'll finally be able to answer the question - "So, how much power are you making?"

Here are the car's particulars:

2012 Mustang:

- 427cid windsor
- Compression - 10.5:1
- Trickflow Stage 3 hydraulic roller cam with 1.7 rockers
- AFR 205 58cc heads
- QuickFuel 850 mech secondary carb
- Edelbrock RPM Air Gap intake
- MSD Ignition (Pro Billet distributor, 6AL2 control module)
- Headers with 1-3/4 primaries
- 3.73 gears
- Tremec Magnum 6-speed manual
- 93 octane gas
- Car has A/C and hydraulic power steering

The dyno is a Mustang in-ground unit, and we'll be taking it upt to a max 6500 RPM.

I'm hoping for *at least* 450 RWHP.

Anyone care to make any predictions about how much the car will actually make?

There will be videos of at least the first and last runs.

Last edited by jsimmons; 11/20/14 at 09:42 AM.
Old 11/20/14, 02:53 PM
  #2  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,109
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,197 Posts
Very cool.
I am willing to bet you make more than 425 HP.
Good luck!
Old 11/20/14, 06:56 PM
  #3  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Siber Express's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2010
Location: Clinton TN
Posts: 1,910
Received 547 Likes on 355 Posts
About time
410
Old 11/20/14, 07:20 PM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
silverstate777's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 27, 2012
Location: Nevada
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suspect your 427 will put down more torque than horsepower. My guess is around 475-525 foot pounds, and I look forward to the video.
Old 11/20/14, 07:59 PM
  #5  
Cobra Member
 
TheReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Location: Southern Al
Posts: 1,496
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
396/430. A turbo would net about 600 hp.
Old 11/21/14, 04:26 AM
  #6  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by silverstate777
I suspect your 427 will put down more torque than horsepower. My guess is around 475-525 foot pounds, and I look forward to the video.
Yeah, all the dyno runs I've seen on stroked Windsors results in more torque than HP (by about a 5-10% margin).
Old 11/21/14, 05:09 AM
  #7  
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
David Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes on 100 Posts
I guess 1 million horsepower and thats right before the dyno breaks and parts from it fly everywhere


431.7 Horsepower
Old 11/21/14, 05:41 AM
  #8  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
MRGTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 2,310
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Carburetor on a 2012...I LOVE that!

So how the heck do you plan to keep this thing registered?
Old 11/21/14, 07:24 AM
  #9  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Carburetor on a 2012...I LOVE that!

So how the heck do you plan to keep this thing registered?
I know people.
Old 11/21/14, 06:45 PM
  #10  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
So far, we're at 439.3 hp, and 456 lbft. It's falling over at about 5600rpm. First thing we're gonna check tomorrow is the fuel pressure (to make sure we're not sucking the bowls dry).

Current settings:

Primary jets = 70
Secondary jets = 79
Accel pump cam is pink 2-in-2
Power valve = 3.5 (7.5-8 inches of vacuum)
Hi-speed air bleeds = 33
Idle air bleeds are 74 (I think)
Squirters = 33
Timing = 8 initial, 36 total

Any recommendations regarding fall-over would be welcomed.

I'll post the videos tomorrow.
Old 11/21/14, 09:10 PM
  #11  
Mach 1 Member
 
Varilux's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2013
Location: Hickory Creek, TX
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
First of all, congrats on the numbers- and on having a unique 2012!

I looked up some info on the 427 and actually learned something...

The "FE" stands for "Ford Edsel" (vs. the "FT" 427- in which case, "FT" stands for "Ford Truck").
Old 11/22/14, 05:31 AM
  #12  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Varilux
First of all, congrats on the numbers- and on having a unique 2012!

I looked up some info on the 427 and actually learned something...

The "FE" stands for "Ford Edsel" (vs. the "FT" 427- in which case, "FT" stands for "Ford Truck").
It's a stroked Windsor, not a FE.
Old 11/22/14, 05:36 AM
  #13  
Member
 
Torino545's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6, 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except this 427 is a Windsor, not related to the FE, FT, or MEL v8's of the 50's 60's and 70's.. As for the mystery power drop. How do the a/f's look? Are the heads a known entity, did you buy them new? (Are you sure the springs are up to the task?)

Just checked specs on the stage 3.. Not really a ton of duration there for a 7.0. Where is the tq peak?

Last edited by Torino545; 11/22/14 at 05:42 AM.
Old 11/22/14, 06:10 AM
  #14  
FR500 Member
 
TripleBlack14's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2014
Location: Rockaway, NJ
Posts: 3,574
Received 118 Likes on 101 Posts
I really don't think horse pressure and torque are what's relevant here.

How can you possibly put a figure on the "holy crap is that thing ever fuↄking cool" factor? Dynos can't tell you that.
Old 11/22/14, 07:01 AM
  #15  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TripleBlack14
I really don't think horse pressure and torque are what's relevant here.

How can you possibly put a figure on the "holy crap is that thing ever fuↄking cool" factor? Dynos can't tell you that.
That's my way of thinking too - I actually didn't do this for the additional power (although I have to admit, the more power the better). I did it for a) the sound, and b) the unique nature of the combination of new car/old-school power train.

The only reason we put it on the dyno is to make the car run as well as possible, and to be able to answer the question everybody asks.
Old 11/22/14, 08:57 AM
  #16  
Member
 
Torino545's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6, 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is definitely very high on the cool scale, just don't give the new school folks ammunition. "Look, 7 liters and my bolt on 5.0 will eat it alive, see, told you pushrods can't make power". For wasted potential, I'll never forget watching a 455 tempest with a 6-71 run 12's... (While a guy in the next lane ran equal times in a carbed, DOVE-C headed, 460 powered, full interior, 68 t-bird)..
Old 11/22/14, 09:13 AM
  #17  
FR500 Member
 
TripleBlack14's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2014
Location: Rockaway, NJ
Posts: 3,574
Received 118 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by Torino545
It is definitely very high on the cool scale, just don't give the new school folks ammunition. "Look, 7 liters and my bolt on 5.0 will eat it alive, see, told you pushrods can't make power".
Well, if the new school folks have to ask, then they wouldn't understand!!!!

When I go to a show or cruise nite in my '14 GT and park near a '65 2+2 (with or without a K code), a '68 GT, or a '69 Mach 1, I'm not thinking about how my car can blow theirs away. My immediate thoughts are "I'm not worthy".
Old 11/22/14, 09:24 AM
  #18  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,109
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,197 Posts
Originally Posted by jsimmons
That's my way of thinking too - I actually didn't do this for the additional power (although I have to admit, the more power the better). I did it for a) the sound, and b) the unique nature of the combination of new car/old-school power train.
^^yeah,....I like that as well.
New school body, old school drive train. Can't beat the sound of a healthy cam idling. Very nice.
Old 11/22/14, 09:45 AM
  #19  
Member
 
Torino545's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6, 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Mach or 2+2 or any other classic is one thing, but a modern chassis with an old engine is another. With a classic the lines, the history grab you and a great engine finishes you off. With a repowered version of the same car you saw 50 of on your way to work, that repower has to be exceptional. Otherwise, cammed 351. Same dimensions, same idle, and possibly same performance I respect the concept, but you didn't cheap out on the build, why cheap out on the follow through?
Old 11/22/14, 09:46 AM
  #20  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
jsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Torino545
It is definitely very high on the cool scale, just don't give the new school folks ammunition. "Look, 7 liters and my bolt on 5.0 will eat it alive, see, told you pushrods can't make power". For wasted potential, I'll never forget watching a 455 tempest with a 6-71 run 12's... (While a guy in the next lane ran equal times in a carbed, DOVE-C headed, 460 powered, full interior, 68 t-bird)..
No N/A 2011-15 5.0 will make that kind of power, and nowhere near the torque I'm making. I'm not worried about the GT owners out there.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: It's Dyno Time!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.