6R80 manumatic... - Page 2 - The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums

Go Back   >

2010-2014 Mustang News on the Previous Generation Mustang
Sponsored By: CARiD

6R80 manumatic...

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10/7/10, 08:27 PM   #21
GTR Member
Thread Starter
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Paddle shifters don't automatically mean dual clutch transmission. Add revmatch functionality and stiffen up the shifts then throw on some plastic made-in-china paddles. Done. How much would that cost Ford if they utilize the same transmission?
Never said anything about paddle shifters meaning it would be a DCT.

What I am saying is that the cost of re-engineering the steering column and wheel to accomodate the paddle shifters would drive the cost up so that it would not be a $300 option unless they built some of the cost into the tranny.

Ford would probably make it a package deal, like "Performance Automatic Transmission" option, that instead of the current $995 cost would be more like a $1995 cost for the performance auto option. That might get you your paddle shifter.

For a lot less they could do the console shifter with a manual gate.
Ltngdrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Join The Mustang Source

Join TheMustangSource.com Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you a Ford Mustang fan? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's a great place for Ford Mustang Fans to meet online.
Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your stang, and have a great time with other Ford Mustang fans. Whether your an old timer or just bought your Mustang you'll find that TheMustangSource.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join TheMustangSource.com Today! - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE


Old 10/7/10, 08:31 PM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: August 25, 2010
Posts: 330
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr View Post
Never said anything about paddle shifters meaning it would be a DCT.

What I am saying is that the cost of re-engineering the steering column and wheel to accomodate the paddle shifters would drive the cost up so that it would not be a $300 option unless they built some of the cost into the tranny.

Ford would probably make it a package deal, like "Performance Automatic Transmission" option, that instead of the current $995 cost would be more like a $1995 cost for the performance auto option. That might get you your paddle shifter.

For a lot less they could do the console shifter with a manual gate.
I would tend to think that a console shift would be easier to engineer into the car than a paddle shift on the wheel. There is plenty of room there to widen the space allowed for the shifter and thus be able to slip it over into manual shift mode. Also it's much closer to the transmission requiring less hardware alteration from chassis to drive line components.
White2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/7/10, 08:42 PM   #23
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr View Post
For a lot less they could do the console shifter with a manual gate.
True. Maybe they'll add this during the mid-cycle refresh. Then do paddle shifters for Next-Gen.
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/7/10, 08:45 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: August 25, 2010
Posts: 330
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Personally I prefer the console shift because it never fails that right when you want to up or down shift on a paddle shifter you can't because the wheel is turned and you would have to have a triple jointed wrist to get to the paddle.
White2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/7/10, 08:49 PM   #25
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by White2010 View Post
Personally I prefer the console shift because it never fails that right when you want to up or down shift on a paddle shifter you can't because the wheel is turned and you would have to have a triple jointed wrist to get to the paddle.
The BMW paddles are attached to the steering wheel so that they move with it. This would be preferred to the stationary ones, IMO.
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/9/10, 03:16 AM   #26
V6 Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No manual-mode for the automatic in a car like the Ford Mustang, is a definitive no-go!
The should add paddle-shifters or a console stick as soon as possible.
(If I remember right the Power-shift transmission in the Fiesta has also no manual-mode - only "3-2-1"?! )


Two other - somehow off-topic - points:

- According to the technical specifications of the F-150 the ecoboost engine has a 0,61 sixth gear, instead of a 0,69. Is this correct? (looks somehow curious for me - but would be great for fuel-economy reasons)

- Does anybody now the differances between Fords 6-speed automatic, GMs 6-speed auto and the ZF 6-speed automatic (as used in many BMWs, Audis and Australian Fords?) Their ratios look nearly identical...
BavarianStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/16/10, 05:06 AM   #27
V6 Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LOL!
It seems that the new Ford Ranger, receives the manumatic option for the 6R80, that Mustang owners are missing!

Quote:
The new Ford 6R80 six-speed automatic transmission has been extensively tuned to deliver smooth, quick shifts almost imperceptibly to the driver, reinforcing the car-like refinement of the new Ranger. In Normal mode, the calibration focuses on comfort and fuel economy. For sportier driving, a quick flick of the shifter changes the transmission into Sport mode. This provides later shift points and the driver can manually select gears through a forward (downshift) or rearward (upshift) movement.
BavarianStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/16/10, 08:28 AM   #28
Bullitt Member
 
rodmoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Location: Wausau Wi
Posts: 250
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paddle shifters mount on the steering wheel are as natural and the third pedal in a manual car. it took me 3 seconds to get used to and fall in love with them on my wife's honda fit sport yea a "sport" lol In that particular car it makes driving kinda fun cuz you can make up for no power and a slugish downshift with the flick of a finger i get out of that car and am looking for them while im driving the truck needing to kick it down. if done right with a eco, normal. and Sport mode i would seriously look into a auto. for floppy bits of plastic they allow you to keep both hands on the wheel and still drive spiritedly. But thats just me and im closer to 60 than 40
rodmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/16/10, 10:48 AM   #29
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paddles will come, the question is when? I say we won't see them until the redesign.
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/16/10, 01:30 PM   #30
Mach 1 Member
 
Modshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 15, 2010
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I really think Nissan did theirs right. It still uses a torque converter but it rev matches and "feels" more like a manual. If Nissan can do it in the 370Z I think Ford can do it in the Mustang.
I agree...The 7AT in the 370Z is a really terrific transmission. If I had gotten it on mine I may still have the car. Their 6MT is a notoriously clunky box. If the Mustang had come with a decent manually controlled automatic I would have bought it. The 6MT is a dream though...I just hope my knees hold out!

On asking for a DCT unit, careful what you wish for. A bad Mechatronic unit (Brains) on an Audi or VW is a $4,000 hit. Yeah, they are going bad.

Last edited by Modshack; 10/16/10 at 01:32 PM.
Modshack is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[?] Swap a 6r80 automatic transmission into the SN95? BavarianStang 1994-2004 V-8 0 3/1/15 10:04 AM
6R80 Transmission clunk Earlsays 2010-2014 Mustang 11 2/14/15 07:47 PM
Another 2014 Mustang gt engine clicking victim jc46002003 Warranty and Service Issue 16 11/23/13 12:29 AM
Problems with 6R80 tranny anyone? Spasticdog 2010-2014 Mustang 72 10/10/13 01:45 PM
5.0 & 6R80 auto or MT82? 825LTRGT 2010-2014 Mustang 29 1/4/11 05:10 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.


2010, The Mustang Source