Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

2011 GT Brembo vs non-Brembo stopping distance

Old 2/2/11, 07:47 AM
  #81  
Cobra Member
 
CO_VaporGT_09's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 5, 2008
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OAC_Sparky
Mounting the engine and transmission transversly saves a good deal of real estate, both in hood length, and in interior cabin space (no or very smal transmission hump) Of couse, the Edge and Sienna are also both much taller letting people sit more upright as well.

But 2011 vs 1964.5, the '11 is about 7" longer, 5" wider overall and 1000 pounds heavier. And it's been a long time since I've been in the 68 Cougar Eliminator my dad had but seems to me there was quite a bit more trunk sppace/elbow room.
But you also have to compare to the average car size nowadays. Look at the current Accord compared to the mid eighties one, which would qualify as a compact now. Most compacts are pushing 2800+ now; back when compacts first arrived, they were also about 1000lbs less.

Compared to the Challenger and the Camaro, the Mustang is more of a true pony car, even though it's bloated and needs to lose weight. Those are its most direct competitors, but even compared to the Genesis coupe it's not too heavy, relatively speaking.
The Challenger is truly a muscle car, nothing pony about it, the Camaro is the only one close to the Stang, and we don't like it cause it's Brand X.

The NASA forums have several guys doing the hp/weight classification for time trials, and have stripped the S197 to about 3000lbs with the driver, which is pretty good for just removing the interior and unnecessary parts. So the body itself is where alot of that weight is. But the luxury bits, big heavy wheels/tires, etc don't help.
Old 2/2/11, 01:20 PM
  #82  
Mach 1 Member
 
Ministang's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OAC_Sparky
But 2011 vs 1964.5, the '11 is about 7" longer, 5" wider overall and 1000 pounds heavier. And it's been a long time since I've been in the 68 Cougar Eliminator my dad had but seems to me there was quite a bit more trunk sppace/elbow room.
A much more fair comparison would be the current Mustang GT to a 1969-70 Mustang (or a Fox body to the 1964.5-66 Mustang). Dimensions and weights are very very close in each of those cases. Mustang size and weight increases have gone in cycles over the years, and I'm really hoping we see a return to Fox body (or 1965-66) dimensions with the next redesign, rather than another jump in size and weight like with the 1971-73 Mustangs.
Old 2/13/11, 04:58 PM
  #83  
V6 Member
 
Nokternal's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boss302R uses 18" wheels
Old 2/13/11, 05:24 PM
  #84  
Cobra Member
 
LEwis26's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nokternal
The Boss302R uses 18" wheels
No it doesnt. It comes stock with 19x9 on the front, and 19x9.5 on the rear.

The leguna seca comes with19x9 on the front, and 19x10 on the rear.


This is directly out of the 2012 mustang brochure.
Old 2/13/11, 05:24 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
OAC_Sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 11, 2010
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nokternal
The Boss302R uses 18" wheels
... and what?
Let's review:

Originally Posted by Nokternal
Besides 18" and 19" wheels are way to big any way. I want to buy 17" rims with some healthy thick rubber on them, the kind of tires a real muscle car is supposed to have. I would buy 16" wheels if only I could find some which would clear the non-Brembo brakes lol. Low profile tires are for cheesy imports and on SUVs owned by "rappa's and gansta's"
Old 2/13/11, 05:27 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
OAC_Sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 11, 2010
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LEwis26
No it doesnt. It comes stock with 19x9 on the front, and 19x9.5 on the rear.

The leguna seca comes with19x9 on the front, and 19x10 on the rear.


This is directly out of the 2012 mustang brochure.
He's talking about the 302R; which, even if he's right, he's wrong.
Old 2/14/11, 05:24 AM
  #87  
V6 Member
 
Nokternal's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boss 302R comes with 18" wheels.


The Boss 302 comes with 19" wheels.

I've decided to keep the stock 18"s on my GT for the winter and get an after market set of 18"s for the summer. The tires on the Mustangs with 18"s are hardly low profiles I see that now that I got mine lol.

Old 3/23/11, 06:14 AM
  #88  
Mach 1 Member
 
hahnsolo78's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 14, 2011
Location: minnesota
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont see too many 5.0's anyway but if i do see one and it doesnt have bembos i think, well.... it doesnt have bembos, and i move on
i dont track my car but the 1695 for brakes like this is a bargian. if you wanted to do it yourself it would cost WAY more then 1695, more like 4000. with brakes, tires wheels ext.
Old 3/23/11, 07:39 AM
  #89  
Cobra Member
 
CO_VaporGT_09's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 5, 2008
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hahnsolo78
i dont track my car but the 1695 for brakes like this is a bargian. if you wanted to do it yourself it would cost WAY more then 1695, more like 4000. with brakes, tires wheels ext.
The Brembo package is a good deal, but not quite $4000 to replicate, or even better (I wouldn't spend the $384/tire to pay for those Pirellis, and would get a wider tire). The thing is it includes the suspension tweaks, and the stability reprogramming, supposedly, so who knows their worth.



http://www.americanmuscle.com/svt-brakekit-0509gt.html

$1250



http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/pr...d=760&cPath=85

$750 for the set



http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rembo%20Brakes

$384/tire = $1536 total
Old 10/24/11, 03:19 PM
  #90  
Bullitt Member
 
Ordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2011
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CO_VaporGT_09
The Brembo package is a good deal, but not quite $4000 to replicate
, or even better (I wouldn't spend the $384/tire to pay for those Pirellis, and would get a wider tire). The thing is it includes the suspension tweaks, and the stability reprogramming, supposedly, so who knows their worth.


http://www.americanmuscle.com/svt-brakekit-0509gt.html

$1250



http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/pr...d=760&cPath=85

$750 for the set



http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rembo%20Brakes

$384/tire = $1536 total

Just want to point out the bold type and the parts you posted. You do realize you just posted $3500 in parts after saying it wouldn't be $4k in parts. Add in suspension parts you have $4K.

Last edited by Ordie; 10/24/11 at 03:21 PM.
Old 10/24/11, 03:35 PM
  #91  
Cobra Member
 
LEwis26's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was that really worth it to dig up a thread from March?
Old 10/24/11, 05:34 PM
  #92  
Cobra R Member
 
Double-EDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there's an opportunity to subtract some $$ from that total for what the replaced parts are worth. I'd say the net is maybe $2500. More than $1600 more but not ridiculously so. For those of us with the 6AT, that FRPP brake kit looks like a decent deal.
Old 10/25/11, 12:59 AM
  #93  
GT Member
 
JerseyGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want the five minutes it took me to read this while thread back...

Some good info. A whole lot of bickering.
Old 10/25/11, 10:08 AM
  #94  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A member on AFM just bought some GT500 take off Brembos and installed on his V6. I think it cost him $500 for the set. Not a bad deal to upgrade.

This topic is one that people can beat to death, but the point is, if you went out and bought all new parts from a dealer or third party to 100% duplicate the BBP, it's going to cost more than if you'd just ordered it. Of course, you can sample bits and pieces from it and add to your heart's content, and that might make more sense to some.

A more effective option might be to pick up the FRPP equivalent of a Boss 302 suspension (springs, adj. shocks/struts, sways) and a set of take-off Brembos from a GT or GT500, then merge the two. The end result would be a "better" performing car in most attributes.
Old 10/25/11, 01:29 PM
  #95  
GT Member
 
Musker's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Overboost
A member on AFM just bought some GT500 take off Brembos and installed on his V6. I think it cost him $500 for the set. Not a bad deal to upgrade.

This topic is one that people can beat to death, but the point is, if you went out and bought all new parts from a dealer or third party to 100% duplicate the BBP, it's going to cost more than if you'd just ordered it. Of course, you can sample bits and pieces from it and add to your heart's content, and that might make more sense to some.

A more effective option might be to pick up the FRPP equivalent of a Boss 302 suspension (springs, adj. shocks/struts, sways) and a set of take-off Brembos from a GT or GT500, then merge the two. The end result would be a "better" performing car in most attributes.

That sounds good
Old 10/25/11, 03:46 PM
  #96  
Mach 1 Member
 
Kinyodas's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: Slidell
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
An alternative idea: I remember my '68 Continental had "double brakes" - as in, double calipers per disc (four pistons). I found this article trying to confirm what I remember.

A 5085lb monster with 1969 technology that stops 60-0 in 109.9 feet?!?!? Nobody thought of replicating this?

Instead of Bembos, just double your calipers!!! That's a mod I'd like to see...

Last edited by Kinyodas; 10/25/11 at 03:49 PM. Reason: edit
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Infamous_blackbeard
Introductions
5
10/8/15 10:45 PM
MustangConvert11
'10-14 V6 Modifications
2
9/30/15 08:01 PM
mx5jhb
2005-2009 Mustang
3
9/30/15 04:44 PM
tacbear
Mustang Motorsports
0
9/27/15 12:57 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2011 GT Brembo vs non-Brembo stopping distance



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.