General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

'11 Challenger 6.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/15/09, 03:14 PM
  #1  
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 Challenger 6.4L

http://www.ontariostreetcar.com/2009...lly-a-reality/
Old 10/15/09, 03:46 PM
  #2  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And they wonder why they had to file a bankruptcy ...
Old 10/15/09, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Team Mustang Source
 
05fordgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
While I love the Challenger's looks, the thought of putting in an even larger (and more heavier) motor into a car that is already tipping the scales at well over 4,100 lbs is kinda anti-productive. At least the GT500 is getting an aluminum block to lighten the car (something Ford knew they needed to do). I'll believe it when I see the actual car with the new motor in it.
Old 10/15/09, 04:01 PM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
 
StangPower05's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
While I love the Challenger's looks, the thought of putting in an even larger (and more heavier) motor into a car that is already tipping the scales at well over 4,100 lbs is kinda anti-productive. At least the GT500 is getting an aluminum block to lighten the car (something Ford knew they needed to do). I'll believe it when I see the actual car with the new motor in it.
x2!! Ill believe it when i see it!
Old 10/15/09, 04:08 PM
  #5  
Cobra Member
 
Red Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id bet money the new engine will make the car heavier. but its nice to see dodge is stepping up their game like ford. the challenger doesnt need any HP boost whatsoever. all it needs is a good taebo workout (aka diet).
Old 10/15/09, 04:20 PM
  #6  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably based on the current Hemi -- bored and stroked from the current 6.1 -- so I doubt it would be any heavier. Unfortunately, probably no lighter either unless they go to an AL block, which has not been mentioned anywhere.

Anyway, something approaching 500hp should keep the pretty but portly Challenger in the Pony car race.
Old 10/15/09, 08:51 PM
  #7  
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
 
burningman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
Posts: 7,442
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
this makes me happy!
To heck with the nay sayers..I love this car and will happily take it anyday of the week.
Old 10/16/09, 10:02 AM
  #8  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
whoopty-doo, it's still a mediocre car
Old 10/16/09, 01:59 PM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
Wolfsburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But a sexy looking one. I love its looks though I don't think it'll ever be serious competition to the Camaro and 5.0 Mustang.
Old 10/16/09, 02:10 PM
  #10  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wolfsburg
But a sexy looking one. I love its looks though I don't think it'll ever be serious competition to the Camaro and 5.0 Mustang.
that's the thing. the looks don't really do much for me

The car is just too big and oversized for my liking
Old 10/16/09, 07:05 PM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,813
Received 775 Likes on 566 Posts
I would like to have one. I think it would be nicer for longer trips
Old 10/16/09, 09:33 PM
  #12  
Cobra Member
 
Wolfsburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
that's the thing. the looks don't really do much for me

The car is just too big and oversized for my liking
Yeah it is pretty big and porky, which is unfortunate and especially noticeable when compared to a '70 Challenger, but that's not enough to ruin it for me. I guess beauty really is in the eye of the beholder.
Old 10/16/09, 11:22 PM
  #13  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
thats right
Old 10/18/09, 08:43 AM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
exgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Star
And they wonder why they had to file a bankruptcy ...
That makes zero sense. Making improvements to a successful model to stay competitive is exactly the right business decision.

On point, I would say that's going to a very impressive upgrade for the Mopar camp. The 6.4 is a stroked 6.1, so therefore, it should not add weight by virtue of adding displacement. I would hope the block is aluminum to shed some weight.

Love it or hate it, Chrysler has been successful with the Challenger, and despite the fact that like the Camaro and GT500 it suffers a bit for being heavy, it performs relatively well. Nice chassis with some noticeable refinement, and although it's a bit too large and heavy for my dollar, it's just drop dead gorgeous.

A 6.4 Challenger with an aluminum block, 500hp and a modern rendition of the Tuff wheel might prove hard to resist for me.

Last edited by exgto; 10/18/09 at 08:45 AM.
Old 10/18/09, 08:54 AM
  #15  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Successful model? They sold less than 18,000 of them so far this year. If you ask me, Challenger is barely more successful than GTO was and we all know how GTO ended.

Instead of wasting money on even bigger engines, why don't they spend money on Caliber and Avenger? Both of them are a joke and potential sales in that class are much larger than muscle cars sales.

Last edited by Zastava_101; 10/18/09 at 08:58 AM.
Old 10/18/09, 08:56 AM
  #16  
Bullitt Member
 
exgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
whoopty-doo, it's still a mediocre car

I see. A larger 5.0 Mustang with an additional 50-80 hp is worth waiting for, but doing the same in the Challenger is "mediocre".

I suppose that's where the qualifier of "in my opinion" comes in handy.
Old 10/18/09, 09:12 AM
  #17  
Bullitt Member
 
exgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Star
Successful model? They sold less than 18,000 of them so far this year. If you ask me, Challenger is barely more successful than GTO was and we all know how GTO ended.

Instead of wasting money on even bigger engines, why don't they spend money on Caliber and Avenger? Both of them are a joke and potential sales in that class is much larger than muscle cars sales.
They have invested money for improvement in both the models you mentioned. A new interior for the Caliber and a new Avenger is due out. To what end and result those investments pay off we'll have to wait and see. Suffice to say, improvements to the Challenger are not coming at the expense of other models.

I am a little surprised at those sales figures. Intuitively, it seems like the car has been successful. I do know they are not built in large numbers based on production limitations, and I do hear stories of buyers having to wait months for orders to be filled. Dealers in my area seem to only have 2-3 on their lot at a time if any.

The 6.4 has been available for some time through Mopar Performance. Refining it and getting certified through EPA for street use to keep the car competitive with upcoming higher hp offerings from Ford or GM is almost implied if the expect to continue selling Challengers.

I'm not privy to the profitability of this car, but off the cuff it seems like it has been good for Chrysler.

Gear head that I am, I tend to be more enthusiastic about more hp in the Challenger than I would be for a new Avenger, but I see your point.
Old 10/18/09, 01:27 PM
  #18  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by exgto
I see. A larger 5.0 Mustang with an additional 50-80 hp is worth waiting for, but doing the same in the Challenger is "mediocre".

I suppose that's where the qualifier of "in my opinion" comes in handy.
I think your dodge fan boy flag is waving. If I'm not mistaken you said in one of your posts chrysler has been successful with this car? Are you serious ??! See Red Star's post for why that is not true.

Anyway, I called the car mediorce because it is. Dodge improving the engine is no big deal to me because the engine is not the problem. It's the humongous gerth this car has.

And yes the 5.0 is a worth waiting for while the 6.4 for the challenger isn't because the 5.0 addresses the mustang's weakness (its motor). I'd be more excited for chrysler if there was a rumor this car was on a diet, or that it was getting a new interior that wasn't in 40 of it's other vehicles
Old 10/18/09, 01:45 PM
  #19  
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
 
burningman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
Posts: 7,442
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
What would be your plan for improving performance considering the car isn't getting a weight reduction without a complete redesign? (the chassis has dictated the weight). So the next option is bigger motor and/or power adders.

Just wondering.
Old 10/18/09, 01:48 PM
  #20  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by burningman
What would be your plan for improving performance considering the car isn't getting a weight reduction without a complete redesign? (the chassis has dictated the weight).
Why do they need to improve performance? More impressive would be if they got few more mpgs from the same engine.
Performance doesn't sell anymore, this ain't 1960s. Boring cars with high quality and fuel economy (a.k.a. Toyota) sell.


Quick Reply: '11 Challenger 6.4L



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.