Your Dyno Numbers
7/18/05, 07:13 PM
#2
With C&L CAI/Predator, SLP PowerFlo axlebacks (auto trans, stock rear gears):
270 rwhp @ 5634 rpm
319 ft/lb tq @ 3894 rpm
Temp was 64F. A/F ratio stayed between 12.4 - 12.9 from 4100-5900rpm.
Done by JBA Racing, San Diego, CA on a Dyno Dynamics.
[There were also a couple interesting items of note.
First, they made both of these pulls in 3rd gear. It seems they couldn't keep the auto tranny from downshifting when they hit the throttle in 4th. However, during a full dyno tune session, they have a way to electronically "lock" the tranny in 4th gear.
I also asked about the correction factor for the Dyno Dynamics system they use. They said that it uses a correction system that will result in lower numbers than say a DynoJet. In fact, JBA has tested both systems. Using a test car, they made a pull on their own dyno and then immediately took it to another shop who uses a dynojet for a comparison pull. The pulls were made about 30 minutes apart, and the dynojet reported about 20 rwhp more than their own dyno.]
270 rwhp @ 5634 rpm
319 ft/lb tq @ 3894 rpm
Temp was 64F. A/F ratio stayed between 12.4 - 12.9 from 4100-5900rpm.
Done by JBA Racing, San Diego, CA on a Dyno Dynamics.
[There were also a couple interesting items of note.
First, they made both of these pulls in 3rd gear. It seems they couldn't keep the auto tranny from downshifting when they hit the throttle in 4th. However, during a full dyno tune session, they have a way to electronically "lock" the tranny in 4th gear.
I also asked about the correction factor for the Dyno Dynamics system they use. They said that it uses a correction system that will result in lower numbers than say a DynoJet. In fact, JBA has tested both systems. Using a test car, they made a pull on their own dyno and then immediately took it to another shop who uses a dynojet for a comparison pull. The pulls were made about 30 minutes apart, and the dynojet reported about 20 rwhp more than their own dyno.]
7/18/05, 10:45 PM
#3
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by don_w@July 18, 2005, 7:16 PM
With C&L CAI/Predator, SLP PowerFlo axlebacks (auto trans, stock rear gears):
270 rwhp @ 5634 rpm
319 ft/lb tq @ 3894 rpm
Temp was 64F. A/F ratio stayed between 12.4 - 12.9 from 4100-5900rpm.
Done by JBA Racing, San Diego, CA on a Dyno Dynamics.
[There were also a couple interesting items of note.
First, they made both of these pulls in 3rd gear. It seems they couldn't keep the auto tranny from downshifting when they hit the throttle in 4th. However, during a full dyno tune session, they have a way to electronically "lock" the tranny in 4th gear.
I also asked about the correction factor for the Dyno Dynamics system they use. They said that it uses a correction system that will result in lower numbers than say a DynoJet. In fact, JBA has tested both systems. Using a test car, they made a pull on their own dyno and then immediately took it to another shop who uses a dynojet for a comparison pull. The pulls were made about 30 minutes apart, and the dynojet reported about 20 rwhp more than their own dyno.]
With C&L CAI/Predator, SLP PowerFlo axlebacks (auto trans, stock rear gears):
270 rwhp @ 5634 rpm
319 ft/lb tq @ 3894 rpm
Temp was 64F. A/F ratio stayed between 12.4 - 12.9 from 4100-5900rpm.
Done by JBA Racing, San Diego, CA on a Dyno Dynamics.
[There were also a couple interesting items of note.
First, they made both of these pulls in 3rd gear. It seems they couldn't keep the auto tranny from downshifting when they hit the throttle in 4th. However, during a full dyno tune session, they have a way to electronically "lock" the tranny in 4th gear.
I also asked about the correction factor for the Dyno Dynamics system they use. They said that it uses a correction system that will result in lower numbers than say a DynoJet. In fact, JBA has tested both systems. Using a test car, they made a pull on their own dyno and then immediately took it to another shop who uses a dynojet for a comparison pull. The pulls were made about 30 minutes apart, and the dynojet reported about 20 rwhp more than their own dyno.]
So what is the real numbers then? 280 horsepower or the lower numbers you have posted?
7/23/05, 04:09 PM
#10
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 2, 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
277hp and 282 torque, car is bone stock, was done on a Mustang Dyno in 90-degree heat. I'm suprised the numbers were that high, especially for an automatic.
7/30/05, 12:48 PM
#12
Team Mustang Source
Stock pulls are in the sig, with 700 miles on the car. I just ran it today and with JLT CAI, DTP 93 octane Predator tune, ProChamber welded to stock cats and 4.10 gears (they don't add hp/tq, but they do skew the readings), I pulled 280rwhp and 297rwtq on a Mustang Dyno.
7/30/05, 07:16 PM
#14
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Location: The Nature Coast, Florida
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I feel a little bummed out got my car dynoed today with MTAS and my best pull was a 246 and that is with a K&N and predator 87 tune
8/6/05, 01:35 PM
#15
Originally posted by pmcarlino@July 22, 2005, 8:23 PM
Saleen supercharger 4 psi boost.97 gegrees. There tune
362rwhp
365rwtq
Saleen supercharger 4 psi boost.97 gegrees. There tune
362rwhp
365rwtq
Wish I could get close to that without needing a supercharger.
8/11/05, 10:00 AM
#17
Originally posted by lostsoul@August 11, 2005, 1:46 AM
SLP/ATI PROCHARGER 9-10psi/ MUSTANG DYNO:
HP= 393.2
TQ= 365.5
Thank gowd you cant supercharge 2005 mustangs.. they just cant handle it
SLP/ATI PROCHARGER 9-10psi/ MUSTANG DYNO:
HP= 393.2
TQ= 365.5
Thank gowd you cant supercharge 2005 mustangs.. they just cant handle it
8/11/05, 10:36 AM
#18
Team Mustang Source
Originally posted by adrenalin@August 11, 2005, 12:03 PM
what? You say you have a procharger and then say "thank gowd (your spelling not mine) you cant supercharge 2005 mustangs."
what? You say you have a procharger and then say "thank gowd (your spelling not mine) you cant supercharge 2005 mustangs."
8/11/05, 10:50 AM
#19
Sure you can put a supercharger on a stock engine, but everyone asks the same thing, how long will it last before failing. 50,000, 100,000 miles, who knows. I'm still not ready to supercharge mine yet.
8/11/05, 01:51 PM
#20
Member
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by adrenalin@August 11, 2005, 10:53 AM
Sure you can put a supercharger on a stock engine, but everyone asks the same thing, how long will it last before failing. 50,000, 100,000 miles, who knows. I'm still not ready to supercharge mine yet.
Sure you can put a supercharger on a stock engine, but everyone asks the same thing, how long will it last before failing. 50,000, 100,000 miles, who knows. I'm still not ready to supercharge mine yet.
.. if people want to wait 3-4 years to see if mine or others will blow up.. then they can... until then its fun time =-)