2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which upgrade next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/29/15, 03:07 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which upgrade next?

I have a 2006 mustang gt which currently has a c&l cai, charge motion deletes, underdrive pullies, bama tune and just flowmaster 40 series mufflers. I have a little extra money and want to do another upgrade. I was thinking of either a 62mm throttle body or long tubes with a catted or catless xpipe. I plan on doing both but not at the same time, Because I got bills lol. Any suggestions on which would be better to do now. Or ideas of other upgrades? Thanks guys and gals.
Old 3/29/15, 03:13 PM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
Jim74656's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2015
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
I would run the work from the front and work back principal, start with the throttle body then the headers and work your way back, or the other option since you have the CAI start with headers and work your way back, either way you have already addressed one area of restriction (the CAI) now its a matter of hitting the next area which is generally the headders/exhaust, the throttle body im not too sure if thats restrictive or not but if you want to tackle that also it wont hurt!
Old 3/29/15, 03:16 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool thanks man. I'm guessing that the stock manifolds and catted hpipe are restricting more than the 55mm throttle body. So I may want to do the exhaust first.
Old 3/29/15, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Cobra Member
 
lowblustang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 1,100
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
It's my understanding that the stock throttle body is not an area of restriction, unless you go forced induction or end up with a big NA car. I would go with the header and exhaust way before I hit up the brittle body.
Old 3/29/15, 03:35 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
Jim74656's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2015
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by lowblustang00
It's my understanding that the stock throttle body is not an area of restriction, unless you go forced induction or end up with a big NA car. I would go with the header and exhaust way before I hit up the brittle body.
agreed, and that's the main reason behind my post as well, the headers (while ok) IMO are rather restrictive, the cat would defiantly be a restriction point, high flow would be good!!
Old 3/29/15, 04:44 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim74656
agreed, and that's the main reason behind my post as well, the headers (while ok) IMO are rather restrictive, the cat would defiantly be a restriction point, high flow would be good!!
Thanks guys. LTs and cattless xpipe here we come. Will post pics soon as I'm done
Old 3/29/15, 04:46 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
Jim74656's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2015
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
What no pics of the car now?? *GASP* I.......must......*dies*.......
Old 3/29/15, 04:54 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim74656
What no pics of the car now?? *GASP* I.......must......*dies*.......
Lol it doesn't sound like anything special at the moment. But it will when these cats are gone!!!!!
Old 3/29/15, 04:55 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait...... Am I getting advice from a 6 cylinder guy? *GASP*
Old 3/29/15, 05:52 PM
  #10  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim74656
agreed, and that's the main reason behind my post as well, the headers (while ok) IMO are rather restrictive, the cat would defiantly be a restriction point, high flow would be good!!
Jim ! I really hate to disagree with you on this, but the stock manifolds on the 3 valve S197's are actually very low restrictive when compared with the previous design from the SN-95 generation..

Unless you plan on either upgrading heads, intake manifold, camshaft, forged internals or going forced induction ? I wouldn't even bother wasting my time and money replacing my stock manifolds as upgrading to aftermarket shorty headers will provide very little improvement over the stock manifolds or not even at all.. Therefore I would highly recommend upgrading to long tube headers instead as your best option..

As for upgrading the throttle body ? Once again unless you plan on upgrading to any of the following mods that I listed above, the stock throttle body is good for up to 550 HP.. Otherwise adding a larger throttle body is just overkill and a waste..

Anyway just my $.02

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; 3/29/15 at 11:35 PM.
Old 3/29/15, 05:56 PM
  #11  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by sleeperstang
Wait...... Am I getting advice from a 6 cylinder guy? *GASP*
I strongly recommend that you follow my advice !
Old 3/29/15, 06:20 PM
  #12  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by lowblustang00
It's my understanding that the stock throttle body is not an area of restriction, unless you go forced induction or end up with a big NA car. I would go with the header and exhaust way before I hit up the brittle body.
Read over post #10 in this thread !
Old 3/29/15, 07:12 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Jim ! I really hate to disagree with you on this, but the stock manifolds on the 3 valve S197's are actually very low restrictive when compared with the previous design from the SN-95 generation.. Unless you plan on either upgrading heads, intake manifold, camshaft, forged internals or going forced induction ? I wouldn't even bother wasting my time and money replacing my stock manifolds as upgrading to aftermarket shorty headers will over very little improvement over the stock manifolds or even at all.. Therefore I would highly recommend upgrading to long tube headers instead as your best option.. As for upgrading the throttle body ? Once again unless you plan on upgrading to any of the following mods that I listed above, the stock throttle body is good for up to 550 HP.. Otherwise adding a larger throttle body is just overkill and a waste.. Anyway just my $.02
Thanks for your advice. I am planning on cams in the near future. And am going to do some type of forced induction later down the road. If I do long tubes and a cattless xpipe would I gain some get up with the upgrades I have now. Thx
Old 3/29/15, 07:26 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
I strongly recommend that you follow my advice !
Oh and the car is not a daily driver. Maybe once a week
Old 3/29/15, 07:31 PM
  #15  
Mach 1 Member
 
Jim74656's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2015
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Jim ! I really hate to disagree with you on this, but the stock manifolds on the 3 valve S197's are actually very low restrictive when compared with the previous design from the SN-95 generation..

[...]

I didn't relize they were lower restriction then the SN95, when did Ford update them? I am guessing around 05-ish?
Old 3/29/15, 08:09 PM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
lowblustang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 1,100
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim74656
I didn't relize they were lower restriction then the SN95, when did Ford update them? I am guessing around 05-ish?
Yes, 05. They went to the three valve head design then for the GTs. Two intakes valves and an oversized exhaust valve, from what I remember reading back then. The second intake valve opens up after a specific set of RPM and full throttle, along with the charge motion plates.

It's been too long since I've read over the material. I need to to go back over it all. Especially since I now own one.

Last edited by lowblustang00; 3/29/15 at 08:10 PM.
Old 3/29/15, 11:43 PM
  #17  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by sleeperstang
Thanks for your advice. I am planning on cams in the near future. And am going to do some type of forced induction later down the road. If I do long tubes and a cattless xpipe would I gain some get up with the upgrades I have now. Thx
Sounds like a great plan to me ! So if your going to be doing both cams and forced induction along with long tubes with catless x or h pipe ? I would then only recommend upgrading to a larger 62mm throttle body if your going to be making over 550 HP, otherwise stick with your stock throttle body..
Old 3/29/15, 11:47 PM
  #18  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim74656
I didn't relize they were lower restriction then the SN95, when did Ford update them? I am guessing around 05-ish?
Ford updated them in 2005 for the 3 valve S197 Mustangs !
Old 3/29/15, 11:49 PM
  #19  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,883
Received 1,965 Likes on 1,590 Posts
Originally Posted by lowblustang00
Yes, 05. They went to the three valve head design then for the GTs. Two intakes valves and an oversized exhaust valve, from what I remember reading back then. The second intake valve opens up after a specific set of RPM and full throttle, along with the charge motion plates.
Yes ! that's correct..
Old 3/30/15, 12:01 AM
  #20  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Before I supercharged i modded in this order and was very happy:

2007 GT with 3.31s and 5M

1. CAI and 93 race tune
2. 4.10 gears
3. Axle backs
4. Kooks LT headers with both a catted x and off-road x pipe and retune

The headers did make a difference. I didn't bother with throttle body and even though I'm now pushing 479rwhp I still have the stock throttle body. There were just too many posts and complaints of problems from people that switched to the BBK throttle body during the time. The FRPP is a very nice piece but without cams and headers I personally don't feel it's necessary.


Quick Reply: Which upgrade next?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.